"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men
from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
(Thomas Jefferson)


Tuesday, June 7, 2011

Dan Boren to Quit Congress?


With Cong Boren having two young children now this is not a shock that he is tired of going back and forth to DC.  He will be holding a news conference this afternoon to announce he is not running in 2012.  If he really is in line to head the Grand River Authority, will he stay in Congress until his term is up or leave early?

So Brad Carson, the Clintonite, is set to go back on the Government pay again after he left Congress to run a nasty campaign against Dr. Coburn in 2004 pretending to be conservative and love guns -- neither of which was true. Hopefully this time, the GOP will put up someone who can win because frankly the candidates who ran against Boren have not been the best.  

Dan Boren has done a good job representing his district for the most part.  He also heard about it when he would back Pelosi but generally speaking he has voted many times with our Republican delegation for the good of the people of Oklahoma.  

We wish Cong Boren well in whatever he decides to do in the future and are very happy for his wife and children that he will be at home a lot more.   He has been one of the Congressman staying in their office so now that will soon come to an end as well. 

Dan Boren To Quit Congress? 
There's word this morning that Congressman Dan Boren, Muskogee Democrat, will not seek reelection next year.
Boren has scheduled a 2 p.m. news conference in Muskogee for an official announcement.
Since being elected to Congress, Boren has married; he and his wife now have two children and they are said to be the major reason Boren is quitting.

There had been speculation he might seek the U. S. Senate seat now held by Senator Tom Coburn, Muskogee Republican.
Today, there's open speculation that Boren might be in line to head the Grand River Authority; a job search is said to be underway by the GRDA.

There's also word that former Congressman Brad Carson, Claremore attorney, will seek the Democratic nomination to succeed Boren.
Source:  McCarville Report
Background on Dan Boren from The Oklahoman:
Boren, a conservative Democrat who has often been at odds with the majority of House Democrats and with President Barack Obama, had his toughest re-election fight in 2010, winning with 57 percent of the vote as the district rebelled against the president's policies. 
He spent $1.8 million to win re-election against unknown Republican Charles Thompson, who spent less than $50,000. 
Boren never officially endorsed Obama, who lost every county in Oklahoma in 2008, and strongly opposed some of the president's biggest priorities, including health care reform and cap-and-trade legislation.

Monday, June 6, 2011

D-Day -- June 6th, 1944

The young men who took part in D-Day had no idea what was ahead -- were the Germans going to be waiting for them as they crossed the channel?  As it turned out, Field Marshal Erwin Rommel was back to visit his wife for her birthday and the Germans never suspected the Allied forces would come into mainland Europe at Normandy  on the 6the of May because of weather so the Nazi troops were not waiting in great numbers.  D-Day turned the tide of the war and the men who fought in WWII became known as The Greatest Generation by a lot of writers.  

They were a great generation but so are the men and women in the Korean War, the Vietnam War, First Gulf War to free Kuwait, Afghanistan, and the Second Gulf War to invade Iraq and take down a leadership that was on the verge of getting a lot of weapons of mass destruction which to this day we believe were taken to surrounding countries when the the chances of invasion became higher.  

When the draft ended and our military became all volunteer, it says a lot about the generations that followed who did not have to serve but have chosen to serve this great Nation.  They are following in the footsteps of their granddads and in some cases their grandmothers in giving back to this Country by serving in the military.

God Bless those who have served and those who serve today.   Thank you goes out to the men who on D-Day risked their lives and some lost their lives in order to turn the tide of the war against Hitler.  It was a bold decision on the part of General Eisenhower and his Command staff and carried out by men from all walks of life many who joined the military after the Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

It was an operation that was successful and the beginning of the end for Hitler and his Nazi regime.  


Background:


June 1944 was a major turning point of World War II, particularly in Europe. Although the initiative had been seized from the Germans some months before, so far the western Allies had been unable to mass sufficient men and material to risk an attack in northern Europe.

By mid-1944 early mobilization of manpower and resources in America was beginning to pay off. Millions of American men had been trained, equipped, and welded into fighting and service units. American industrial production had reached its wartime peak late in 1943. While there were still critical shortages -- in landing craft, for instance -- production problems were largely solved, and the Battle of the Atlantic had been won. Ever increasing streams of supplies from the United States were reaching anti-Axis fighting forces throughout the world.

By the beginning of June 1944, the United States and Great Britain had accumulated in the British Isles the largest number of men and the greatest amount of materiel ever assembled to launch and sustain an amphibious attack. Strategic bombing of Germany was reaching its peak. In May 1943, the Combined Chiefs of Staff had given high priority to a Combined Bomber Offensive to be waged by the Royal Air Force and the U.S. Army Air Forces. By late summer 1943, Allied bombers were conducting round-the-clock bombardment of German industry and communications. In general, British planes bombed by night and American planes bombed by day. Whereas an air raid by 200 planes had been considered large in June 1943, the average strike a year later was undertaken by 1,000 heavy bombers.

After considerable study strategists determined to make the cross-channel attack on the beaches of Normandy east of the Cherbourg Peninsula. Early objectives of the operation were the deep-water ports at Cherbourg and at Brest in Brittany.

Three months before D-Day, a strategic air campaign was inaugurated to pave the way for invasion by restricting the enemy's ability to shift reserves. French and Belgian railways were crippled, bridges demolished in northwestern France, and enemy airfields within a 130-mile radius of the landing beaches put under heavy attack. Special attention was given to isolating the part of northwestern France bounded roughly by the Seine and Loire Rivers. The Allies also put into effect a deception plan to lead the Germans to believe that landings would take place farther north along the Pas de Calais.

Opposed to the Allies was the so-called Army Group B of the German Army, consisting of the Seventh Army in Normandy and Brittany, the Fifteenth Army in the Pas de Calais and Flanders, and the LXXXVIII Corps in Holland -- all under command of Field Marshal Erwin Rommel. Commander of all German forces in western Europe was Field Marshal von Rundstedt who, in addition to Group B, also had at his disposal Group G composed of the First and Nineteenth Armies. In all, Von Rundstedt commanded approximately fifty infantry and ten Panzer divisions in France and the Low Countries.

Despite unfavorable weather forecasts, General Eisenhower made the decision to attack on June 6, 1944. At 0200 that morning one British and two American airborne divisions were dropped behind the beaches in order to secure routes of egress from the beaches for the seaborne forces. After an intensive air and naval bombardment, assault waves of troops began landing at 0630. More than 5,000 ships and 4,000 ship-to-shore craft were employed in the landings. British forces on the left flank and U.S. forces on the right had comparatively easy going, but U.S. forces in the center (Omaha Beach) met determined opposition.

Nevertheless, by nightfall of the first day, large contingents of three British, one Canadian, and three American infantry divisions, plus three airborne divisions, had a firm foothold on Hitler's "fortress Europe."
[Note: The primary source for this text is the U.S. Army Center for Military History.]

Excerpt:  Read More at WWII History

Rick Santorum 2012 Campaign for President Launches

Another Republican throws their hat in the ring for President -- this time a person who is very much the social conservative but also while in the Senate was strong on defense and foreign affairs.  We have heard him speak and he kept our attention unlike a few people who almost put you to sleep.  Will be interesting to watch the field unfold but must say would rather have Santorum than a Huckabee.

One of the oddest things we saw today on a conservative website was touting a Ryan/Rubio ticket.  The same people who say that Obama is not a natural born citizen are touting Rubio who was born in this Country to parents who were still Cuban citizens as they were not here for the full five years.   Do some conservatives not know the Constitution requirements to be President any better than the Democrats?

Make mistakes from time to time on here and we thank the people who point them out so we can make the correction.  Before an article goes up, it is researched not just relying on the sites where we got the original information unless it is for humor.  Not afraid to pick up a phone and verify as well.  We actually thought there was so much information out in public about what constitutes a natural born citizen.

At least we know Santorum is a natural born citizen.


Rick Santorum 2012 Campaign For President Launches

Rick Santorum 2012
AP/The Huffington Post
First Posted: 06/ 6/11 07:46 AM ET Updated: 06/ 6/11 08:07 AM ET 


Santorum, a favorite among his party's social conservatives, chose to confirm his plans during an appearance Monday morning on ABC's "Good Morning America" at the banner-draped site he chose in the western Pennsylvania coalfields for his formal announcement.

In the network interview, Santorum accused President Barack Obama of having a weak foreign policy, saying he doesn't feel he has stood up sufficiently to Iran and asserting he has done too little to speak out against Syrian President Bashir Assad for the violence there.

(snip)

The blunt-talking conservative lacks the name recognition and fundraising organization of his better-known rivals, but the two-term senator's advisers are counting on social conservatives who have huge sway in some early nominating states and have yet to settle on a favorite candidate.


So far, those social conservatives are weighing already declared candidates such as Pawlenty and potential contenders Bachmann and former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin.

Santorum, a lawyer by training, had been laying the groundwork for a presidential bid when he lost a bruising re-election bid to the Senate in 2006. His opposition to abortion, gay marriage and embryonic stem cell research makes him an appealing candidate for conservatives. But his sometimes abrasive style alienated voters in Democratic-leaning Pennsylvania, and they replaced him with Bob Casey, an anti-abortion Democrat.

Santorum's policy positions align with national conservatives who now are looking at many of the expected candidates with skepticism.

Romney's changes of heart on gay rights and abortion do little to help his second presidential effort. Gingrich is twice divorced. Huntsman, who worked for three Republican administrations, nonetheless accepted Obama's offer to be the U.S. ambassador to China.

Santorum, 53, has his own hurdles to overcome: He has been out of elective office since 2007 and lacks the robust fundraising or personal wealth of his likely rivals.

He is expected at next Monday's debate in New Hampshire, which is likely to include more of the expected field.

Excerpt:  Read More at Huffington Post

Sunday, June 5, 2011

Palin: I didn't mess up Paul Revere history (WHAT?)

This is dedicated to those people who sent nasty emails that ended up in spam about my Palin post yesterday.  How many more nasty emails am I going to get today?   I am not a member of the establishment, not a big donor, but know professors of American history who are now shaking their heads about the Palin comments from this morning that she was right about Paul Revere.  We decided to visit the website of the Paul Revere House to get the official story which took all of two minutes to find.  Here are the facts that Palin is ignoring with her revisionist history:

In 1774 and the Spring of 1775 Paul Revere was employed by the Boston Committee of Correspondence and the Massachusetts Committee of Safety as an express rider to carry news, messages, and copies of resolutions as far away as New York and Philadelphia.


On the evening of April 18, 1775, Paul Revere was sent for by Dr. Joseph Warren and instructed to ride to Lexington, Massachusetts, to warn Samuel Adams and John Hancock that British troops were marching to arrest them. After being rowed across the Charles River to Charlestown by two associates, Paul Revere borrowed a horse from his friend Deacon John Larkin. While in Charlestown, he verified that the local "Sons of Liberty" committee had seen his pre-arranged signals. (Two lanterns had been hung briefly in the bell-tower of Christ Church in Boston, indicating that troops would row "by sea" across the Charles River to Cambridge, rather than marching "by land" out Boston Neck. Revere had arranged for these signals the previous weekend, as he was afraid that he might be prevented from leaving Boston).


On the way to Lexington, Revere "alarmed" the country-side, stopping at each house, and arrived in Lexington about midnight. As he approached the house where Adams and Hancock were staying, a sentry asked that he not make so much noise. "Noise!" cried Revere, "You'll have noise enough before long. The regulars are coming out!" After delivering his message, Revere was joined by a second rider, William Dawes, who had been sent on the same errand by a different route. Deciding on their own to continue on to Concord, Massachusetts, where weapons and supplies were hidden, Revere and Dawes were joined by a third rider, Dr. Samuel Prescott. Soon after, all three were arrested by a British patrol. Prescott escaped almost immediately, and Dawes soon after. Revere was held for some time and then released. Left without a horse, Revere returned to Lexington in time to witness part of the battle on the Lexington Green.
Are people still supporting this woman who not only doesn't understanding basic American history, but has revised it now about Paul Revere and stands by her version?  

Did she not understand why the people with Paul Revere were so secretive before the ride as he thought he had a British infiltrator in his group?   Or that the bell tower was using to hang the lanterns -- one if by land, two if by sea?

Guess I could now be classified with the 'evil' mainstream media since I think she has pulled one big con job on conservatives.  If conservatives are looking for a candidate with intelligence, then they need to look elsewhere.

There is also a review out today of the new Palin two-hour movie that cost $1M about Palin and shows she is for something before she is against -- remember the flip flops of Kerry and Gore that conservatives made fun of?  You want to bet they defend Sarah?  Will the same Palinbots be raving about that movie as well and telling the rest of us that we are stupid not to see the brilliance?  The author's comments about the movie will make you laugh unless you are a Palinbot and then you will be mad that he didn't rave about the movie.

If Obama did the same thing, the Palinbots would be all over him but now that she has revised history it is okay.  Why?  That is the question a lot of us would like to know.  She has sold some gullible people that the media is out to get her all the time and she is always right.  Most of these people would normally think twice but not with Palin who is a rock star to them.  It is simply amazing to watch and makes you wonder what is the difference between Obama being treated like a rock star by the left and Palin being treated like a rock star by the right.  In both instances neither can do anything wrong as their followers will tell you and both sets go after anyone saying anything against their idols like they committed a heinous crime.

Nice to know that she knows more about Paul Revere and the Revolutionary War than professors of history that are appalled at her comments after this morning when Fox gave her a chance to say she misspoke.  She stood by her original comments.
Palin: I didn't mess up Paul Revere historyThe former Alaska governor was in Boston when she was asked about the Revolutionary War hero       By LAURIE KELLMAN The Associated Press
updated 2 hours 2 minutes ago — Sarah Palin insisted Sunday that history was on her side when she claimed that Paul Revere's famous ride was intended to warn both British soldiers and his fellow colonists.

"You realize that you messed up about Paul Revere, don't you?" "Fox News Sunday" anchor Chris Wallace asked the potential 2012 presidential candidate.

"I didn't mess up about Paul Revere," replied Palin, a paid contributor to the network.

"Part of his ride was to warn the British that were already there. That, hey, you're not going to succeed. 
You're not going to take American arms. You are not going to beat our own well-armed persons, individual, private militia that we have," she added. "He did warn the British."

Palin, who again said she has not decided whether to run for president, was asked about the Revolutionary War hero during a stop Thursday in Boston on her East Coast bus tour.

"He who warned the British that they weren't gonna be takin' away our arms by ringing those bells, and makin' sure as he's riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be sure and we were going to be free, and we were going to be armed."

Palin's brush with the nation's history came toward the end of her "One Nation" bus tour that generated intense interest as she traveled from Washington to New England. Along the way, she steadfastly refused "a million times" to say whether she was running for president.

(snip) 
 Even her otherwise successful media events can leave lingering questions about Palin's grasp of and interest in history, public policy and other subjects of substance. 
On Sunday, Palin insisted she was right about the purpose of Revere's famous "midnight ride." 
"I know my American history," she told Wallace. 
Excerpt:  Read More at MSNBC
One good thing is that she is not a teacher because some students in AK would be getting the wrong history lesson.  How she could say "I know my American history" is beyond a lot of us.  But then she is the person who said that she can see Russia from her front porch and that Africa is a country so guess we shouldn't be surprised.  Actually am shocked at the comments on various sites defending her revisionist history on Revere.  I thought conservatives were smarter than that.

    Saturday, June 4, 2011

    Sarah Palin Should Spend Less Time on Fox News and More Time Brushing Up on U.S. History

    Was not going to post this weekend but this was too good to pass up!  Wonder if it is going to be the media's fault for quoting what she said.  This comes from Forbes not some media outlet that some conservatives consider the enemy because they toss Palin hardball questions.  Not sure she can answer very many softball questions if she doesn't even know the story of Paul Revere.  


    Earlier we had Michelle Bachmann in Concord, NH, not once but twice referring to Concord, NH, as the place the Revolutionary War started and then conservatives saying it gets mixed up all the time.  Give me a break!  Lexington-Concord is in Massachusetts and was in Massachusetts when I was in American History and also when my kids took American history.  

    Why are some conservatives so fast to defend dumb statements out of women Republicans but will attack the Democrats if they made the same statement?  When someone makes a dumb statement no matter the party, it is dumb.  Makes you wonder about the aides to some of these candidates.  Right now the GOP women are not looking very smart but don't you know, it is all the media's fault is the line that is used all the time.


    Margaret Thatcher was very smart and no one had to use 'it was the media's fault" as she took any and all interviews.  The British press for the most part are much tougher on their politicians.  

    Guess I am going to lose my conservative badge for daring to pick on Palin but she makes some of the dumbest statements that young and older people laugh about.  It was in poor taste to attack Romney in MA when he was announcing for President in NH, but he got the last laugh as her basic history is lacking.  There is a saying that applies to anyone wanting to run for office who doesn't understand basic history:
    Edmund Burke (1729-1797) statement, "Those who don't know history are destined to repeat it."
    We agree with Forbes that maybe we need a Jeopardy style contest for our candidates instead of debates which usually have some softball questions.  Is it too much to ask that the Republican candidate know their history and are able to answer any and all questions with no softballs?  Why do we have to settle because someone has alleged star power?  Wouldn't you rather have an intelligent candidate?  I know I would.

    Sarah Palin Should Spend Less Time on Fox News and More Time Brushing Up on U.S. History

    Jun. 4 2011 - 1:13 pm 
    Sarah Palin joined a number of other GOP hopefuls in New Hampshire last week making the typical pre-campaign rounds. But unlike Mitt Romney, who managed to focus his speaking on the economy and his business experience, Palin decided to give her fans a brief history lesson on Paul Revere:
    He who warned, uh, the British that they weren’t going to be taking away our arms uh by ringing those bells and making sure as he’s riding his horse through town to send those warning shots and bells that we were going to be secure and we were going to be free and we were going to be armed.
    If this is not evidence enough that the U.S. education system needs fixing, I don’t know what is. Here’s the video of Palin making all her contenders, from Herman Cain (who has made his own recent gaffes in regards to the Constitution) to Michelle Bachmann, look like damn geniuses.


    All this leads me to believe that instead of presidential debates, what the GOP race needs is a series of Jeopardy contests, all focused on politics, economics, and American history. That would tell us much more, I’m afraid, about the candidates, than any debate ever could.

    Friday, June 3, 2011

    Paul Ryan Embraces American Exceptionalism, Rejects Isolationism in Foreign Policy Speech

    What have we learned about the Republican field for President in the last few days?  We are going to start with Paul Ryan who is no longer a solid "NO" but wants to see how the field plays out and is being encouraged not only by the RNC Chair Priebus who is also from Wisconsin but by others to get in the race.  We will see how the candidates break out in the next month or so.  Paul Ryan would be definitely someone to consider.
    Paul Ryan Embraces American Exceptionalism, Rejects Isolationism in Foreign Policy Speech 
    7:53 PM, Jun 2, 2011 • By MICHAEL WARREN 
    Paul Ryan defended America's role as the leading defender of freedom and liberty in a foreign policy address this evening. Speaking to the Alexander Hamilton Society, Ryan, the Republican chairman of the House Budget Committee, laid out a vision that defended America's exceptional role as a world leader and drew sharp contrast to those who advocate for isolationism and withdrawal. 
    "A world without U.S. leadership will be a more chaotic place," Ryan said. "A place where we have less influence, and a place where our citizens face more dangers and fewer opportunities. Take a moment and imagine a world led by China and Russia." 
    Ryan spoke at length about American exceptionalism as it relates to America's role in the world. "America is an idea," he said. "And it was the first nation founded as such. The idea is rather simple. Our rights come to us from God and nature. They occur naturally, before government." 
    This belief in the American idea, Ryan said, should inform the nation's foreign policy. "Now, if you believe these rights are universal human rights, then that clearly forms the basis of your views on foreign policy," he said. "It leads you to reject moral relativism. It causes you to recoil at the idea of presistent moral indifference toward any nation that stifles and denies liberty, no matter how friendly and accommodating its rules are to American interests." 
    Ryan squarely rejected the position of increased isolationism. "Today, some in this country relish the idea of America's retreat from our role in the world," Ryan said. "They say that it's about time for other nations to take over, that we should turn inward, that we should reduce ourselves to membership on a long list of mediocre has-beens. 
    "He continued, "Instead of heeding these calls to surrender, we must renew our commitment to the idea that America is the greatest force for human freedom the world has ever seen."

    Source:  Weekly Standard
    With Donald Trump saying he might consider an independent run if he doesn't like the GOP candidate, Republicans are looking at giving the election to Obama if they are not careful.  This wanting a pure candidate has to stop or we are looking at four more years of Obama with the my way or no way on a candidate.

    New Jersey Governor Christie is no longer a solid NO along with Rick Perry of Texas although we believe Perry would support Christie in a heartbeat if he chose to get in the race.  The fact that people from Iowa already made the trip to NJ to encourage Christie says a lot.

    Stay tuned as more people throw their hat in the ring and maybe we can get a candidate that enthuses most Republicans.  After what happened yesterday prior to Romney's announcement when Palin decided to take the limelight away from the man who as head of the Republican Governor's Association was in many ways responsible for her becoming Governor, it showed the lack of class on her part not to honor a fellow Republican.  If the situation were reversed the victim act by Palin would have been out in full force and Palinbots would have been on the attack.

    Enjoy the weekend!

    Thursday, June 2, 2011

    Speaker Boehner Throws Down the War Powers Act Gauntlet On Libya

    This has been expected since Obama didn't think it was necessary to follow the War Powers Act.  Most of us have a different impression of the War Powers Act then Obama and his mouthpiece Carney.  If the President sends out troops into a war time situation, it is his responsibility to report to Congress.  Unfortunately this President doesn't think the Rules or the Constitution apply to him or he never would have run for office.

    The War Powers Act was put in place to stop the kind of action of that Obama took unilaterally on Libya without Congress on board.  President Bush spent months with Congress before taking the United States into Afghanistan and then into Iraq.  If President Bush had done what Obama has done, the Democrats would be demanding impeachment.  Double standard alive and well with the Democrats.
    Speaker Boehner Throws Down the War Powers Act Gauntlet On Libya
    June 02, 2011 6:33 PM
    ABC News Senior White House Correspondent Jake Tapper 
    In the immortal words of the vice president, this could be a big $%^ing deal: House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, is throwing what one Republican calls “a legal and political hot potato at the President.” 
    In a resolution to be voted on in the House tomorrow, Boehner is giving the president two weeks – until the Pentagon Appropriations bill comes up – to either:  
    a) Ask for authorization for the military intervention in Libya, or 
    b) Figure out how to disengage the US from the NATO operation in Libya. 
    The resolution states: 
    “The President has not sought, and Congress has not provided, authorization for the introduction or continued involvement of the United States Armed Forces in Libya. Congress has the constitutional prerogative to withhold funding for any unauthorized use of the United States Armed Forces, including for unauthorized activities regarding Libya.” 
    Boehner is explicitly and formally stating that the president did not check the box on the War Powers Act before sending the US military to intervene in Libya. 
    The White House had no immediate comment, though earlier today White House press secretary Jay Carney said “we believe that the policy is working, we believe that the goal the president has is shared by a vast majority of members of Congress, and we have consulted with Congress every step of the way since we have initiated this policy.” Carney went on to reiterate that “our involvement militarily is limited, as the president promised, and will continue to be so, and he has made very clear, for example, that we will not be sending ground troops to Libya; that is off the table.” 
    Last week we noted that two bipartisan actions in the House of Representatives related to Libya seemed to bode ill for congressional support for the U.S. role in military intervention there. Last month in a letter to congressional leaders, the president suggested that the US mission in Libya is now so limited he didn’t think congressional authorization necessary. 
    House Republican leaders believe that if the resolution being offered by Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio -- requiring the president to withdraw U.S. Armed Forces from participation in the NATO mission in Libya within 15 days – had come up yesterday it would have passed. 
    Instead the Kucinich bill comes up tomorrow. With the Boehner bill an alternative. 
    According to a House Republican aide, in the House GOP conference this afternoon, Speaker Boehner said: “The Kucinich measure will express our constituents’ angst, but it will also have long-term consequences I believe are unacceptable. If Kucinich passes, it will have an impact on Afghanistan. From a NATO perspective, we're trying to hold the alliance together and advance a common agenda in Afghanistan. We will have turned our backs against our NATO partners who have stuck by us for the last 10 years.” 
    Excerpt:  See slideshow at from Heritage Foundation at ABC News

    Ryan: Obamacare "Raids Medicare and It Rations Medicare ... For Current Seniors"

    Cong Paul Ryan is joining fellow Congressmen Steve King (R-IA) and Mike Pence (R-IN) in giving fiery one-minute speeches on the floor of the House.  We have been amazed at how King and Pence can put so much into a one-minute speech and now Paul Ryan is joining them. 

    Never had any dealings with Medicare until Mom moved to Norman.  Since then I have learned that people better have supplemental insurance or they are in a world of hurt.  Even on a hospital stay that is covered by Medicare for a family member, they paid all but $1,132 and acted like they had done a huge favor.  Fortunately, Federal Blue Cross/Blue Shield picked up the $1,132.  It took 11 pages for Medicare to say they didn't pick up the full amount and at the end give an appeal form if you disagreed with their findings.  When BC/BS said they had paid the bill, they sent two pages.  Found out over a month ago that BC/BS had paid but Medicare is just now paying?  There is a reason federal employees who retire are told to keep the Federal BC/BS. 

    Yet, the federal government wants to take over all of healthcare?  My limited experience with Medicare says it is going to be a nightmare.  Private industry does it much better IMHO. 
    Ryan: Obamacare "Raids Medicare and It Rations Medicare ... For Current Seniors"
    11:45 AM, Jun 2, 2011 • By JOHN MCCORMACK


    Transcript available at The Weekly Standard

    Wednesday, June 1, 2011

    Dow falls 279 points on fears about economy

    Dow falls 279 points on fears about economy




    A growing pessimism about the American economy led to the biggest one day drop in the stock market since last August.


    The Dow Jones industrial average ended the day on Wednesday down 279.12 points, or 2.2%, to 12,290.67. 

    See Los Angeles Times for more information.

    Sooner Women's Softball Honors Football Player Austin Box

    As I was getting ready to do a post for today, I was reminded there is so much more than politics while reading the Norman Transcript.  We had a football player, Austin Box, overdose on pain medication recently and it puts everything in perspective about what is important in your life and how important it is to live your life to the fullest every day.

    Today's post is more than about college athletics -- it is about the pain medicine that some people get hooked on that is prescribed by their doctor and requires bigger and bigger doses to ease the pain until something like this happens where someone accidentally overdoses because the pain is too much.  It doesn't have to be an athlete but can be anyone that starts taking more and more medicine for pain.  With all the advances in medicine, don't you think someone would come up with pain medication that isn't addictive and habit forming?

    Rush Limbaugh was a perfect example as it took out his hearing for the most part and he faced charges for getting all his prescription medicine.  If you are in pain, some people will do anything to get relief from that pain.  As I put on our OU message board after we learned that Austin Box had died most likely due to an accidental overdose of pain medication, we don't walk in their shoes when it comes to pain so none of us know how we would react.  I blame the doctors that keep prescribing this medication and the fact there is no database to see if someone is doctor shopping to get prescriptions.

    In today's environment we read so much about the 'privileged' athletes and very seldom about the athletes that are there for each other and don't expect something for nothing.  If you need an example of spoiled athletes, you can look no farther than what is happening with  Ohio State University where their football coach Tressel put winning above everything in his treatment of Pryor his quarterback and other players during his tenure.  He even cheated in his assistant days by rigging raffles when he was an assistant under Earl Bruce.  When you read the Sports Illustrated article about their quarterback Pryor, you are left with what is college athletics coming to?  Tressel was touted at Ohio State as this ethical, honest coach which couldn't be farther from the truth.  As one article summed it up, he held bible sessions in the morning and cheated in the afternoon.

    Fortunately for college athletics there are only a few like Pryor and other OSU athletes along with USC and other schools who don't believe the rules are for them.  NCAA has a chance with this OSU investigation to finally level the hammer on a President who said that Tressel could fire him and an AD who looked the other way not to mention a compliance department that is suspect.

    University of Oklahoma has been there with a former dumb quarterback and another player who took money for a job that they didn't work but claiming on their time cards they did.  Bomar's $15,000 seems peanuts to the scandal breaking at OSU.  Our Coach Bob Stoops removed those two from from the team right away even though Bomar was the starting quarterback and the season was going to start in a month.  OU has been under a microscope by the NCAA for a lot less violations and our coaches didn't lie to the NCAA like Tressel.  You are going to have kids in trouble who are athletes just like you do kids who are just regular students, but OSU has taken it to a whole new level with a coach who played his football players knowing some were ineligible for the whole season.  Guess he hoped he didn't get caught.  Now the NCAA is on the hook to bring sanctions to OSU that will be a warning to other schools to get their programs in order.

    With all the press about Ohio State, Tressel, Pryor and a program out of control, it is refreshing to read an article like this in your local paper.  It restores your faith that there are a lot more college athletes who play by the rules along with coaches than there are cheaters.  Recently OU had nine football players and nine women's basketball players go to Haiti to help out.  It was sponsored by a local church not the University of Oklahoma.  Our Women's Softball Team is a perfect example of the closeness of so many teams at OU and other universities who day in and day out represent their teams with class.  They have come together to honor  Austin Box who loved baseball and softball.
    In tribute to BoxBy Clay Horning The Norman Transcript
    31 May 2012 
    NORMAN — Following the death of Oklahoma linebacker Austin Box, who was found unresponsive in an El Reno home before being pronounced dead May 19 at Mercy Health Center in Oklahoma City, coach Patty Gasso’s Sooner softball team chose to honor Box by wearing his No. 12 on its batting helmets. 
    The Sooners wore the No. 12-adorned helmets May 20-22 at the Norman Regional. The Sooners won the regional, earning a spot at the Tucson Super Regional against Arizona. 
    Would they keep the number on their helmets for Tucson? Very possibly, but what they could not yet have known was just how personal their remembrance of Box was about to become. 
    That process was set in motion. The day after the Sooners claimed the regional, Box’s mother, Gail, hand delivered a letter to Gasso, hoping it would be read to the team. 
    Gasso 
    “Part of the letter was just about him being an avid baseball fan and player and center fielder,” Gasso said, “and us having an angel in the outfield, and we were just very motivated and inspired by it.” 
    Box may be better known as a schoolboy baseball legend than football legend in his hometown of Enid. Long a baseball town, Box led Enid’s American Legion Majors program to an American Legion World Series championship the summer before he arrived in Norman.
    Upon being read the letter, the Sooners decided they would keep Box’s number on their helmets as long as their season continued. 
    They also received the motivation and inspiration of knowing their play might give some comfort to a grieving family. 
    “It was another inspiring fact for this team,” Gasso said, “that by playing softball, we may have been able to touch a family and maybe give them just a little bit of relief.” 
    It motivated the Sooners to not only play well, but to also enjoy the process, which tends to make playing well easier. 
    In addition to receiving the letter from the Box family, they were concerned about teammate Jessica Shults, who has been too ill to play. Also, the Sooners were mindful of many Oklahomans just beginning to pick up the pieces in the aftermath of a tornado’s destruction. 
    “We really just kind of maturely understood that this should be a celebration of an opportunity to play,” Gasso said. 
    They may well have had an angel in the outfield. OU beat Arizona in two-straight games, earning its first trip to the WCWS since 2004. Additionally, the Sooners’ success kept the Wildcats out of Oklahoma City’s Hall of Fame Stadium for just the second time in 24 seasons. 
    OU begins its WCWS experience against Arizona State at 6 p.m. Thursday. 
    Norman Transcript
    Too many times stories like this get ignored for the scandals so I decided this wasn't going to be one of them.