"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men
from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
(Thomas Jefferson)


Thursday, August 9, 2012

Is this the Direction that the Religious Right Wants to Take Our Public Schools?


People on the right might ask why I would use Mother Jones as a source but frankly they are much more honest today then some of  the publications on the right who support or ignore this nonsense.  When you learn that some of the voucher schools In Louisiana are using textbooks from the Bob Jones University publishing company, you know they are going to be out of whack with the mainstream, but reading the 14 Wacky "Facts" that appear in the textbooks leaves a person with little to say.

The Huffington Post had also covered this including a letter from the President of the Interfaith Alliance which I have posted below article on the 14 Wacky "Facts":
In a letter to the governor, C. Welton Gaddy, a Baptist minister and President of the Interfaith Alliance, accused Jindal of initiating a program that “is bad for religious freedom and bad for public education as well as a blatant attack on the religious freedom clauses in the United States Constitution.”  
I thought vouchers were supposed to help children in poor performing schools get a better education not subject them to this nonsense.  What are these children going to do when they get to college and find out what they have been taught is fiction?  This is a far cry from a quality education for all students touted by President George W. Bush who believed in holding administrators and teachers accountable for failing schools.  IMHO there is no way he would condone this garbage.

Trying to make the KKK look good blows my mind away.  What kind of a person would dare teach that to black students or any students?  How about slave masters were nice guys?  In the Air Force the common term is Bravo Sierra which is entirely appropriate here.

People on the right have criticized the National Education Association and rightly so over the years for their union activism.  In this case Louisiana could use some of that activism.  Thought some of the Christian schools here were bad but Jindal takes it to a new low.  Maybe I should be looking at what textbooks they are using in the evangelical schools here before I say Jindal takes it to a new low.

I know the Christian schools here don't have to be accredited as they are private schools and that some parents send their kids there when they don't get good grades in the public schools. Teachers also don't have to be a college graduates to teach in some of the Christian schools in Oklahoma.  Note I am only talking about schools run by Evangelical Churches not the Catholic schools here.

In doing the research on one of the Christian school systems Del City, OK, I discovered they belong to The Foundation for American Christian Education who touts The Bob Jones University Book Publishing Company.  Then we have the John Birchers involved in Christian Education here in Oklahoma in that same Christian school.  Still researching if the local Christian schools have purchased the books from Bob Jones University and will update if we can determine they are using the same books.

We already knew that some of the Baptist Churches here believe the earth is 5,000 years old and refuse to allow their kids to visit one of the best Natural History Museum in the Country -- Ed Noble Museum of Natural History on the University of Oklahoma campus.  They don't believe carbon dating which gives the proof the earth is much older than 5,000 years old.  Do they also teach the following is the question now?
14 Wacky "Facts" Kids Will Learn in Louisiana's Voucher Schools
—By | Tue Aug. 7, 2012 3:00 AM PDT 
Thanks to a new law privatizing public education in Louisiana, Bible-based curriculum can now indoctrinate young, pliant minds with the good news of the Lord—all on the state taxpayers' dime. 
Under Gov. Bobby Jindal's voucher program, considered the most sweeping in the country, Louisiana is poised to spend tens of millions of dollars to help poor and middle-class students from the state's notoriously terrible public schools receive a private education. While the governor's plan sounds great in the glittery parlance of the state's PR machine, the program is rife with accountability problems that actually haven't been solved by the new standards the Louisiana Department of Education adopted two weeks ago. 
For one, of the 119 (mostly Christian) participating schools, Zack Kopplin, a gutsy college sophomore who's taken to Change.org to stonewall the program, has identified at least 19 that teach or champion creationist nonscience and will rake in nearly $4 million in public funding from the initial round of voucher designations. 
Many of these schools, Kopplin notes, rely on Pensacola-based A Beka Book curriculum or Bob Jones University Press textbooks to teach their pupils Bible-based "facts," such as the existence of Nessie the Loch Ness Monster and all sorts of pseudoscience that researcher Rachel Tabachnick and writer Thomas Vinciguerra have thankfully pored over so the rest of world doesn't have to. 
Here are some of my favorite lessons:
  • 1. Dinosaurs and humans probably hung out: "Bible-believing Christians cannot accept any evolutionary interpretation. Dinosaurs and humans were definitely on the earth at the same time and may have even lived side by side within the past few thousand years."Life Science, 3rd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 2007 
  • 2. Dragons were totally real: "[Is] it possible that a fire-breathing animal really existed? Today some scientists are saying yes. They have found large chambers in certain dinosaur skulls…The large skull chambers could have contained special chemical-producing glands. When the animal forced the chemicals out of its mouth or nose, these substances may have combined and produced fire and smoke."Life Science, 3rd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 2007 
  • 3. "God used the Trail of Tears to bring many Indians to Christ."—America: Land That I Love, Teacher ed., A Beka Book, 1994 
  • 4. Africa needs religion: "Africa is a continent with many needs. It is still in need of the gospel…Only about ten percent of Africans can read and write. In some areas the mission schools have been shut down by Communists who have taken over the government."—Old World History and Geography in Christian Perspective, 3rd ed., A Beka Book, 2004 
  • 5. Slave masters were nice guys: "A few slave holders were undeniably cruel. Examples of slaves beaten to death were not common, neither were they unknown. The majority of slave holders treated their slaves well."United States History for Christian Schools, 2nd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 1991 
  • 6. The KKK was A-OK: "[The Ku Klux] Klan in some areas of the country tried to be a means of reform, fighting the decline in morality and using the symbol of the cross. Klan targets were bootleggers, wife-beaters, and immoral movies. In some communities it achieved a certain respectability as it worked with politicians."United States History for Christian Schools, 3rd ed., Bob Jones University Press, 2001 
  • 7. The Great Depression wasn't as bad as the liberals made it sound: "Perhaps the best known work of propaganda to come from the Depression was John Steinbeck's The Grapes of Wrath…Other forms of propaganda included rumors of mortgage foreclosures, mass evictions, and hunger riots and exaggerated statistics representing the number of unemployed and homeless people in America."United States History: Heritage of Freedom, 2nd ed., A Beka Book, 1996 
  • 8. SCOTUS enslaved fetuses: "Ignoring 3,500 years of Judeo-Christian civilization, religion, morality, and law, the Burger Court held that an unborn child was not a living person but rather the "property" of the mother (much like slaves were considered property in the 1857 case of Dred Scott v. Sandford)."American Government in Christian Perspective, 2nd ed., A Beka Book, 1997 
  • 9. The Red Scare isn't over yet: "It is no wonder that Satan hates the family and has hurled his venom against it in the form of Communism."— American Government in Christian Perspective, 2nd ed., A Beka Book, 1997 
  • 10. Mark Twain and Emily Dickinson were a couple of hacks: "[Mark] Twain's outlook was both self-centered and ultimately hopeless…Twain's skepticism was clearly not the honest questioning of a seeker of truth but the deliberate defiance of a confessed rebel."Elements of Literature for Christian Schools, Bob Jones University, 2001 
"Several of [Emily Dickinson's] poems show a presumptuous attitude concerning her eternal destiny and a veiled disrespect for authority in general. Throughout her life she viewed salvation as a gamble, not a certainty. Although she did view the Bible as a source of poetic inspiration, she never accepted it as an inerrant guide to life."Elements of Literature for Christian Schools, Bob Jones University, 2001
  • 11. Abstract algebra is too dang complicated: "Unlike the 'modern math' theorists, who believe that mathematics is a creation of man and thus arbitrary and relative, A Beka Book teaches that the laws of mathematics are a creation of God and thus absolute…A Beka Book provides attractive, legible, and workable traditional mathematics texts that are not burdened with modern theories such as set theory."—ABeka.com 
  • 12. Gay people "have no more claims to special rights than child molesters or rapists."Teacher's Resource Guide to Current Events for Christian Schools, 1998-1999, Bob Jones University Press, 1998 
  • 14. Globalization is a precursor to rapture: "But instead of this world unification ushering in an age of prosperity and peace, as most globalists believe it will, it will be a time of unimaginable human suffering as recorded in God's Word. The Anti-christ will tightly regulate who may buy and sell."Economics: Work and Prosperity in Christian Perspective, 2nd ed., A Beka Book, 1999
Whew! Seems extreme. But perhaps we shouldn't be too surprised. Gov. Jindal, you remember, once tried to perform an exorcism on a college gal pal. 
View the pictures that come with the 14 Wacky "Facts" that Louisiana children will be learning in the prive voucher schools at http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2012/07/photos-evangelical-curricula-louisiana-tax-dollars
Looks like others have picked up on this story and this excerpt here from Huffington Post includes a letter from the President of the Interfaith Alliance to Governor Jindal:

In a letter to the governor, C. Welton Gaddy, a Baptist minister and President of the Interfaith Alliance, accused Jindal of initiating a program that “is bad for religious freedom and bad for public education as well as a blatant attack on the religious freedom clauses in the United States Constitution.”  
Gaddy says Louisiana's sweeping new voucher system, ushered in by Jindal, is problematic because it uses state taxpayer dollars to offer vouchers to more than half of Louisiana’s public school students. These students can then use these vouchers to attend a number of religious learning institutions, some of which have been shown to teach extreme anti-science and anti-history curriculums.
“Let me be clear: I am not appalled that a Christian school is teaching its students that God created the Earth ... Children in my church learn that every Sunday," Gaddy said. “I am appalled that these schools are teaching theology as science, and they’re doing so with government money, my tax dollars." 
"Teaching the theology of Creationism is part of the mission of religious schools, and religious education more broadly – I defend with my life’s work their right to teach future generations about their faith. But they should not receive financial support from our government to do so.” 
The new voucher program has drawn scrutiny around the state from a variety of parties. A revamped accountability program failed to alleviate critics' concerned when the details of the system showed that private and religious schools participating in the voucher program would maintain their state funds even if their students failed basic reading and math tests. Louisiana's teachers' union, the Louisiana School Boards Association, and a number of school districts were among those that joined lawsuits in an effort to block implementation of the program. 
Gaddy has taken Republican leaders to task on issues of religion in the past. Last month he criticized Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) for her inquiry into Muslim officials in the U.S. government and their supposed ties to the Muslim Brotherhood. 
Here’s the text of his letter, from the Washington Post:
August 7, 2012
The Honorable Bobby Jindal
Office of the Governor of Louisiana
P.O. Box 94004
Baton Rouge, LA 70804-9004 
Dear Governor Jindal: 
I write to you as the President of Interfaith Alliance to express my disappointment, concern and indeed, outrage at the school voucher program you have implemented in the state of Louisiana. Not only do I represent this national organization whose members come together from 75 faith traditions and belief systems to protect religious freedom, champion individual rights, and promote policies that protect both religion and democracy, I also serve as Senior Pastor for Preaching and Worship at Northminster (Baptist) Church in Monroe, and thus, I am one of your constituents. Your school voucher scheme is bad for religious freedom and bad for public education as well as a blatant attack on the religious freedom clauses in the United States Constitution. 
Thankfully, thoughtful educators, concerned citizens, and media representatives in the state are exposing your ruthless attack on public education — the provision that the founders of our nation considered essential to the survival of our democracy. You seem unable to distinguish between religious indoctrination and basic public education. Though Interfaith Alliance is a non-litigious agency, we are encouraging other agencies to file suits challenging your decision to use public tax dollars to build structures for churches across the state and to fund educational curricula that qualify more as a catechism than as a tool for holistic education. Of course, you flaunted your disregard for government-subsidized religion by choosing a Roman Catholic Church as the venue at which to sign your legislation! 
When in 1785 the state of Virginia considered a bill that would fund “Teachers of the Christian Religion,” James Madison penned his famous remonstrance reminding his contemporaries, and indeed, generations to come, that “it is the duty of every man to render to the Creator such homage and such only as he believes to be acceptable to him.” Put another way, funding, participating in, and sending our children to religious education programs is the right and responsibility of faith communities, clergy, and parents as they see fit — not of our government. Every American also has an equal right to choose not to fund or participate in religious education. 
Your voucher program also will fund private schools and curricula that are inevitably not up to the standards of quality information of public schools, and fund the teaching of theology, which goes against the fundamentals of our religious freedom. I was appalled to learn that private schools—funded with my taxes—will teach our children that evolution does not exist, using the fabled Loch Ness Monster as a “real” example, from textbooks that state: 
  • “God created each type of fish, amphibian, and reptile as separate, unique animals. Any similarities that exist among them are due to the fact that one Master Craftsmen fashioned them all.” 
Let me be clear: I am not appalled that a Christian school is teaching its students that God created the Earth. Children in my church learn that every Sunday. I am appalled that these schools are teaching theology as science; and they’re doing so with government money, my tax dollars. Teaching the theology of Creationism is part of the mission of religious schools, and religious education more broadly—I defend with my life’s work their right to teach future generations about their faith. But they should not receive financial support from our government to do so. 
What often gets lost in the conversation around school vouchers is the negative impact they can have on religious schools. In the short term, having new revenue streams is of course helpful to private schools, but the fact is that with government money comes government regulation, which can open religious schools up to all kinds of threats to their autonomy that it is in religion’s best interest to avoid. 
Furthermore, public education is often called the “great equalizer,” and right now, our nation is at a place in history in which all of us truly need to learn how to get along with each other and work together for the good of our nation despite our differences in religion, ethnicity, race, and income. Besides preparing our children and young people to be proficient in math, science, grammar, thinking, and communication skills, public education has no greater role than enabling us to work and walk together despite obvious diversity. Many of the private schools in Louisiana that you are supporting with millions of dollars of vouchers are honestly saying upfront that their mission is sectarian education that promotes one faith over another and makes no effort to commend the common good. 
Finally, one of the central problems with school voucher programs could not be on clearer display than it is in Louisiana: Vouchers create competition between religious groups for government funds, and put the government in a position to prefer one over another. A case in point is the reason state Rep. Valarie Hodges changed her position on the school voucher program. I wish that I could celebrate this move, and had she decided to no longer support it because she realized how harmful such funding is to our religious freedom, I would have. Instead, she changed her position on vouchers because she found out that not only Christian groups received the funding, but Muslim groups can too. As a former Hindu—a minority religion in this nation—you, as much as anyone in our state, should be fully aware that herein lies one of the many problems with funneling government money to religious groups. By doing so, the government can (or at least can try) to pick and choose between them -- exactly the situation our founders created the First Amendment to avoid. 
In short, the school vouchers system you have allowed to be implemented in our state embodies everything that is wrong with school vouchers as a whole and threatens the integrity of both religion and government. I hope that you will take a step back and see that what you are doing is propelling education in Louisiana back to a level that will decrease even more our abominable ranking when it comes to education in our nation. You are hurting the state, the education of our children, and broadsiding an affront to the values of religious freedom that most of us hold dear. 
I am incapable of and uninterested in judging your motivations for such a destruction of education in our state. But, you are capable of changing your mind and helping the situation rather than hurting it. Governor Jindal, please, for the sake of all that is good about education, religious freedom, and our state, put an end to the school vouchers program in Louisiana. 
Sincerely,
C. Welton Gaddy


The Politico Cloakroom: Where Did Congress Go?

Wednesday, August 8, 2012

Governors Fallin (R-OK) and Hickenlooper (D-CO) Joint Effort on CNG Vehicles for Use in State Automobile Fleets


Applaud the efforts of Governor Fallin (R-OK) and Governor Hickenlooper (D-CO) to get Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) vehicles into the state fleets.  Note to members of Congress -- this is a bi-partisan effort between the Republican Governor of Oklahoma and the Democrat Governor of Colorado who have been joined by governors of both parties from other states in the effort.

It would be great if members of Congress would do the same thing -- work together for the good of all Americans instead of being stuck on pure partisan politics.  It is getting worse not better with the Republicans in charge which I didn't think was possible.  Starting to see more signs on cars about voting to oust the current Do-Nothing Congress.  Makes sense why Mary Fallin wanted to leave Congress to come back to run for Oklahoma Governor because she could get things done and make a difference in the lives of Oklahomans.

At the University of Oklahoma, they have been a leader in converting their vehicles to use CNG -- there is actually a CNG station on the North Base of OU which used to be a Navy Flight Training facility in WWII before it was turned over to the University and is the home of OU's Max Westheimer Airport.  When you drive by on Flood Avenue you see the price of $1.25 per gallon and then go buy gas for $3.19 a gallon which makes you stop and think.  More and more gas stations in Oklahoma have a pump for CNG which is a good sign.

Here in Norman, they are even turning the fleet of garbage trucks to CNG as they buy new ones along with the fleet of city vehicles being converted.  It is not just Norman but cities around the Country who are going to CNG for their vehicles. IMHO this is the way for city and states to go not the electric vehicles as no new power plants are needed for CNG vehicles.

Governors Fallin and Hickenlooper are on the right track IMHO!   Why not have vehicles that burn a clean fuel and make the air better for all of us to breath?  It is a great start and before it is done, would like to see all the states and the federal government participate.
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 
August 8, 2012 
Auto Manufacturers Converge in Oklahoma to Discuss CNG Vehicles for State Fleets 
OKLAHOMA CITY – Representatives from the nation's auto manufacturers, including the Big Three, are in Oklahoma City today to meet with Oklahoma Governor Mary Fallin and procurement experts to ask questions surrounding a recently issued multistate request for proposal. 
The RFP, which comes as a result of a nationwide, bi-partisan effort led by Fallin and Colorado Governor John Hickenlooper, asks the nation's auto manufacturers to produce affordable and functional compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles for use in state automobile fleets. 
As of today, 22 states have joined the RFP, indicating their intention to purchase CNG vehicles for use in state fleets. 
With 123,000 CNG vehicles in the nation, and 1,000 fueling stations, the governors hope that this new commitment will help overcome the obstacles, including limited infrastructure and consumer demand, which may be holding automakers back from producing a wider variety of CNG vehicles. 
"The objective behind our efforts is simple," said Fallin. "We want auto manufacturers to know that states mean business and are strongly committed to the use of CNG vehicles in state fleets so more vehicles can become available to consumers." 
Fallin added, "By incorporating more CNG vehicles into our state fleets, we can save tax dollars by reducing the amount we spend on fuel. We can also support the use of an abundant, American-made energy source that will help create jobs, strengthen tax revenue bases at the state level, improve the environment, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil."
Wednesday's meeting, which is open to the public, is intended to provide a general overview of the RFP and an open-forum opportunity for dealers and automakers to ask questions of the states' representatives. 
The Governors' efforts demonstrate the demand and need for natural gas as a clean and efficient fuel to power automobiles and trucks. The natural gas vehicles industry, however, still faces hurdles. Chief among those is a pending rule proposal from the Environmental Protection Agency and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which is poised to place natural gas vehicles at a competitive disadvantage relative to other alternative fuel vehicles. Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards currently being considered by the federal government lean heavily towards electric cars, discouraging auto manufactures from producing more CNG vehicles and creating an uneven playing field for alternative transportation fuel technologies. 
"We're at a critical juncture right now. It's vital that the federal government remains technology-neutral and lets the market decide what alternative fuel technologies work," said Fallin. "We want the nation to realize that clean-burning natural gas is a technology that works today and offers a viable path toward achieving energy independence in the U.S." 
While 14 Governors have signed a MOU in support of the initiative, in total 22 states have shown an interest in the RFP including Oklahoma, Colorado, Arkansas, Connecticut, Hawaii, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.
The RFP was coordinated by the National Association of State Procurement Officials, which leverages the purchasing power of states by aggregating purchases on a variety of products. 
Click here to review a copy of the RFP.

Tuesday, August 7, 2012

Governor Fallin: “During Wildfire Crisis, ‘Oklahoma Standard’ Emerges Once Again”


When the fires broke, Gov Fallin was at the Republican Governor's Association Meeting and the next thing we know she is back in the state touring the areas that were hard hit by these forest fires.  She didn't stand around having all these news conferences like we have seem out of some Governors.  She went to meet with the people who had been affected by the fires and the first responders who were in the front lines fighting these fires.  It could have been much worse but they had the helicopters up in the air dumping water on the fires very quickly.  This was the perfect example of everyone working together to put out these fires and save towns in the process.

The stories of heroism are coming from all over.  One young man in the southeastern part of my County helped get his grandparents out of their home and then jumped on his grandfather's tractor with a grader in front to make a huge circle of dirt around the homestead to stop the fire.  It worked.  At temps over 110, his grandfather would never have been able to stand the heat to clear off the land.  What a wonderful gift this young man gave his grandparents.  They have to be very proud of him.  He also saved his Aunt's home.

On Friday the call went out that they needed ice chests and ice for the water bottles for the first responders and within a couple of hours, the word went out that they had more than enough.  We have heard and read story after story of Oklahomans helping their neighbors which makes me proud to be from Oklahoma.

The first responders are the lifeblood of our communities who protect us on a daily basis.  Anyone who says we don't need any more first responders doesn't have a clue what they are talking about.  These responders were working in temps over 110 degrees as those are the days we were breaking or tying the heat records from the Dust Bowl years.  We broke one record going to back to the 1890's before we became a state.   We also broke records for being the highest low temperatures.  These first responders kept working through the heat to save communities and homes.  Oklahomans owe them a debt of gratitude.

I just texted to the American Red Cross my $10 donation.  The Red Cross here does an amazing job with the number of disasters I have seen them involved.  They have teams available to help in other states as well at a moment's notice.  Very efficient and bring a lot of help in a time of need.

Oklahomans are very fortunate with this wildfire crises to have a Governor like Mary Fallin who puts Oklahoma and its people first as her and her team got the necessary resources into the locations in order to contain these fires.  Wish she was running for President because then I would have someone I would support 100%!
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEAugust 7, 2012 
Editor’s note: This is one of a regular series of monthly columns titled “Oklahoma Now” by Governor Mary Fallin. 
Governor Mary Fallin’s “Oklahoma Now” ColumnHeadline: “During Wildfire Crisis, ‘Oklahoma Standard’ Emerges Once Again” 
By Governor Mary Fallin 
The month of August started like the month of July ended: hot, dry and windy. In other words, the conditions were perfect for wildfires. 
Difficult summers, however, are something we’re used to. In response to the weather and in anticipation of wildfires, I placed all 77 counties under a State of Emergency due to drought. When dozens of fires broke out across the state, Oklahomans were prepared. 
Because of the statewide emergency declaration, state and local governments were able to make emergency purchases and immediately begin protecting their communities. And although they couldn’t stop the fires that spread across the state– especially those that may have been started maliciously and intentionally – the statewide governor’s burn ban protected us from a scenario that could have been even worse. 
As always, Oklahoma’s first responders proved and continue to prove why they are considered on par with the best in the country and the world. Firefighters worked relentlessly through the weekend – many with little or no sleep – protecting our communities, saving homes and saving lives. Many are still going. 
In the town of Drumright, which was threatened by the massive Creek County fire that burned over 58,000 acres, exhausted first responders told me how they had joined with other local fire departments to halt the blaze and save their community. Sure enough, while the grasslands and forest around the town were scorched black and the surrounding area had lost several houses, the town itself was untouched. Drumright residents rallied to support their heroes: the fire department and city hall were stocked to near-bursting from ice, water, Gatorade and snacks donated by local families. 
For those who did lose their homes to wildfires, help is coming. My office is working with groups like the Red Cross and the Salvation Army, as well as Insurance Commissioner John Doak, to help those individuals and communities get back on their feet as quickly as possible. Additionally, as the state moves from response to recovery operations, I expect to be able to request a Disaster Declaration from the federal government, and to hopefully receive federal assistance for individuals and families affected by the fires. 
As heartbreaking as it is to see so much destruction, it is inspiring to see how Oklahomans band together in a time of crisis – neighbor helping neighbor, and community helping community. The response and recovery effort has truly been statewide, with help coming from the National Guard, state first responders, emergency volunteers, and thousands of men, women and children who are collecting and donating resources to support firefighters or neighbors in distress. It is yet another demonstration of the “Oklahoma Standard” of community and selflessness for which we have become known for. 
Moving forward, we have a lot of work to do. There are many people who still need help. Fortunately, this is Oklahoma, and there are many who are willing to provide that help. In the last few days, we’ve had countless people contact our office to ask how. Below you will find contact information and instructions for donating resources to some of the most effective and engaged organizations in the state. 
My sincere thanks go out to the tens of thousands of Oklahomans who have worked to fight wildfires, support recovery efforts or simply comfort their neighbors. 

Red Cross
Online: Go to www.redcross.org and click the “make a donation” buttonMobile Phone: Text “Red Cross” to 90999 to make a $10 donationMail Donations To:
Red Cross
601 NE 6th Street Oklahoma City, OK 73104 
Salvation Army
Online: Go to www.disaster.salvationarmyusa.orgPhone: Call 1-800-SAL-ARMY
Mail Donations To:
The Salvation Army
Attn: Oklahoma Wildfires PO Box 12600
Oklahoma City, OK 73157 
Baptist General Convention of OklahomaOnline: Go to http://bgco.org/wildfireresponsePhone: 1-800-690-6933Mail Donations To:
BGCO
Attn: Oklahoma Wildfire Relief,
3800 N. May Ave.
Oklahoma City, OK 73112.
###

Monday, August 6, 2012

More on the Do Nothing Congress and their Five Week Break


If members of Congress want to know why they are rated so low by the American people read this paragraph from John Avlon:
But as we see each session, the desire to go home for a regularly scheduled vacation seems to drive legislation even more than any objective sense of common responsibility to solve a problem. No wonder the best of Congress are bailing out. As Ohio Republican Steve LaTourette put it to Roll Call, “For a long time now, words like compromise have been considered to be dirty words. And there are people on the right and the left who think that if you compromise you’re a coward, you’re a facilitator, you’re an appeaser.”
Congressman LaTourette has been one of the most reliable members of Congress for common sense and has had it today with the left and the right who don't understand they were elected to Congress to fix the problems not be the unappeasables as we are seeing today.  The 'my way or no way' crowd from both sides care more about their own future and playing up to lobbyist and donors then they do working for the American people.
Hyperpartisan politics and election-driven self-interest keep getting in the way of actually governing in the national interest. A quick flip through a history book shows that divided congresses don’t need to be this dysfunctional—but the play-to-the-base jokers in this congressional class would rather splash around on summer vacation than do their job.
Fiddling while Rome burned at least provided background music. If members of Congress don’t feel the urgency to work together to solve the urgent problems we all face, then there is a solution: fire them in the fall so they can enjoy a permanent vacation. 
Couldn't agree more to fire this group of obstructionists who only play to the donors and base of both parties.  We have a major drought across the Country that the Farm Bill would help and was passed in a bi-partisan manner in the Senate but not in this partisan House -- still sitting there.  In a bad economy the Republicans in the House want to drastically cut the food stamp program while continuing to make sure their donors get their perks from the Farm Bill.  

Once again, the Republicans in the House want a new tank in the DoD budget that the Army doesn't want.  Wonder which defense contractor donor wants to make sure he gets a tank contract even when the DoD says NO!  Are you going to believe the House Republicans on Armed Services that the Army needs the tank or the Army.  My money is on the Army because I don't trust members of Congress on both sides not to sell out in today's lobbying/big donor arena.

How can these members of Congress even have the nerve to take a 5-week vacation and have Town Halls in their districts?  The American people need to evict these members from Congress who are willing to throw the American people under the bus with their obstructionists tactics if they don't get their way.  They are elected to Congress to represent everyone in their district or state for Senators but that seems lost on a large number of them.

One thing I have learned from this Congress is that you never want a House or Senate with an overwhelming number of one party.  Both Houses run much better when it is more evenly divided.  Republicans in the Senate should be ashamed of all the filibusters in the Senate stopping needed legislation.  The clincher for me is when Republican Minority Leader McConnell wanted to attach Repeal of the Affordable Healthcare Act  (AHA) onto the Cyber Security bill when it has absolutely nothing to do with the bill.  Disgusting pandering to the far right.  The pandering in the Senate to the far left is just as bad.  The House has pandered to the far right 33 times on repeal and replace of Obamacare aka AHA.  There is one slight problem -- House Republicans don't have a replacement bill and their pandering has cost the American taxpayers $50 million with those 33 votes knowing full well it was a waste of time.
There are honorable exceptions—particularly the House members from both parties who rationally argued that they hadn’t earned their summer break just yet.
The vote to adjourn failed in the House in a 150-265 with 15 not voting.  There were 78 Republicans who voted with all the Democrats not to adjourn.  Looks like the vote made zero difference as members of Congress left town anyway to begin a five week vacation.  Connie Mack who is running for the FL Senate voted not to adjourn.   What a novel thought that you don't get a vacation when you don't do your job.

This article speaks for me and many Americans who believe that both sides of the aisle in Congress has members who would rather play to their far right and left bases along with the lobbyists and big donors rather than do the work of the American people.  This is the Congress of the United States not the Student Council which is the way they are acting.  Time for members of both parties to work together for the good of the American people.  If they cannot handle that thought then they need replaced with elected members of Congress who do understand that the extreme partisan politics we see today from both sides needs to stop.
Congress Is Taking Another Vacation? Seriously? 
 
Lawmakers are departing town for a five-week break, leaving critical legislation behind. John Avlon on why we need to fire the jokers who’d rather play games than fix problems. 
Five full weeks of summer vacation have just begun for members of Congress. That’s after nine full weeks off so far this year—and the House gets six more away before the election. All that time off, a sweet health-care plan, and quasi-fame as well. Is this a good gig or what? 
But most folks only take time off when they get their job done—and that definitely isn’t the case for the 112th Congress. 
While Midwest farmers suffer through the worst drought in decades, the House left a bipartisan farm bill passed by the Senate sitting on the table. Certainly, there’s room for improvement in that traditionally pork-filled appropriation bill. But make the improvements and pass the damn bill—the all-or-nothing tug-of-war between the perfect and the good doesn’t help people who need it now.  
Even more resonant to anyone who uses the post office (which is just about everyone) is the fact that our once-proud USPS is about to default on a $5.5-billion payment. This has been a slow-motion implosion, and the Senate got its act together to pass a bipartisan bill months ago that would help avoid default. But the House had different priorities. Instead, the chamber found time to rename 60 post-office branches and attempted to repeal the health-care law for the 33rd time.
It’s hard to tell whether this is just lazy or malevolent, but small-government advocates of gridlock are going to have a hard time explaining to people on Main Street how maintaining the post office isn’t an essential role of government. Reform is the opposite of inaction. If these bipartisan bills that passed the Senate are in need of fixing, then fix ’em—or take responsibility for the looming failure. 
Of course, the Senate has its own embarrassments to be held accountable for—and I’m not just talking about Harry Reid invoking Romney’s dad in a cheap campaign attack. The fact that Senate Republicans filibustered a bipartisan attempt to pass a cyber-security bill is not just an indignity, but a dereliction of duty. 
We can’t wait for a digital Pearl Harbor to take this 21st-century threat seriously, but the siren song of special interests once again distracted from the national interest. The fact that some senators treated the amendment process as a Christmas tree for their own priorities (like Sen. Chuck Schumer, who attached a post-Aurora gun-control provision onto the bill) also didn’t help the prospects of passage. But this epic failure could have serious national-security consequences.
56332861
The U.S. House of Representatives will be empty for August. (Brendan Hoffman / Getty Images)
Speaking of national security, talk about avoiding the sequestration—that “fiscal cliff” of budget cuts set to kick in early next year—has taken up much of the energy of this Congress in recent days, especially (and ironically) from fiscal conservatives like Rep. Jeb Henserling, who co-chaired the Super-Fail committee that led directly to the imposition of the cuts. At issue now is the $500 billion of defense cuts that were paired with domestic discretionary cuts to make this hatchet job so unpalatable. 
But when the House Armed Services Committee actually appropriates more money than the Pentagon is asking for (for a tank they don’t want, but defense contractors do) it’s hard to take their alleged quest for fiscal discipline seriously. The fact that the House GOP passed an alternative bill to pass all the sequester cuts onto entitlements only adds insult to the injury. 
If Congress is truly concerned about the looming fiscal cliff or the impact of the sequestration cuts on defense, they should damn well do something about it. No one else in the country gets to avoid doing their job because of the rationalization that nothing is likely to get done until after the election. We all know that a balanced plan—like Bowles-Simpson, with spending cuts, revenue increases, and entitlement reform—is needed to deal with deficits and debt. Hoping for an ideological Armageddon of an election isn’t going to change that. 
All of which is to say that this Congress seems determined to deserve their rock-bottom approval ratings. 
(snip)
This epic failure could have serious national-security consequences.
He’s right. And there’s no rational reason to expect that it’s going to get better in the near future. The polarization of the parties has empowered all-or-nothing absolutists, particularly on the Republican side of the aisle. That’s why Congress is in serious need of fundamental rules reform, like forcing senators once again to enact a filibuster in person on the floor, rather than have it be a routine parliamentary maneuver. 
(snip)
Excerpt: Read More at The Daily Beast




















Sunday, August 5, 2012

How the US Takes the Gold After the Olympics Versus How Corporations are Treated


If there was one paragraph in the article that jumped out at me, it is this one which I bolded:
Currently, a company that invests in America has to pay immediate U.S. taxes on its profits from that investment. But if the company instead invests and creates jobs overseas through a foreign subsidiary, it does not have to pay U.S. taxes on its overseas profits until those profits are brought back to the United States, if they ever are. Yet even though companies do not have to pay U.S. taxes on their overseas profits today, they still get to take deductions today on their U.S. tax returns for all of the expenses that support their overseas investment.
Let me get this straight.  If a company uses its foreign subsidiary to invest and create more overseas jobs, they do not pay US taxes on profits unless they bring those profits back to the United States but they can take an income tax deduction for expenses of that foreign subsidiary immediately off their taxes.  That means they can park the profits in their Cayman Island accounts for years and never have to pay a US tax on the profits while at the same time taking a deduction each year for expenses.

Will someone please tell me why this loophole exists in the tax laws because IMHO it is wrong and favors those companies who send jobs and work overseas.  Is this another thing Romney is hiding with his tax returns?  He keeps saying he paid all taxes required but most regular people would not understand someone not paying tax in the United States but taking off deductions for that entity.  I am one of them.  Think it is reprehensible that this loophole even exists.

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) introduced a bill earlier this week that would exempt Olympians from taxes on their winnings but looks like the bill is not getting traction.  The reason given -- no lobbying efforts to get it passed.  IOTW no matter how good a bill is, you have to get the lobbyists behind the bill in order to get it passed?  Yet some people will attack you when you say there are a lot of bought and paid for members of Congress from both parties.

Why is the IRS taxing our Olympic Athletes who earn medals?  That should be a no brainer with all the work and dedication they have put in over the years that their medals and winnings should be tax exempt.
Something is really wrong with a tax system that goes after US medal winners yet allows corporations doing business overseas to pay no tax on their profits as long as they keep them in offshore accounts but can take deductions off of the income tax for that same entity.

Talk about a screwed up system -- the IRS rules and regulations over the years have led to this mess but the one thing you have seen over the years is changes in the Tax Code have continued to  favor the wealthy and their investments while the Middle Class is fed a bone or two to keep them quiet and think they were given a really good deal.  Is this why the big donors went to Romney and the Super PACs because they know he will do nothing to change the Tax Code -- same with most Republicans in the Congress?  This is all beginning to make sense starting with why Romney won't release his income tax returns.  He is correct that most Americans wouldn't understand them.  The fallout would hurt him but will guarantee you it would also hurt Republican members of Congress who push low tax rates for all including the wealthy.

The mantra of today is tax the Olympic athletes but don't tax the profits of the wealthy making money overseas.  Maybe it is time our Olympic athletes to open Cayman accounts!
How the IRS Takes the Gold After the OlympicsPosted 4:00PM 08/03/12 Posted under: Taxes
Olympic Gold Medal
Team USA's biggest winner of the London Olympic Games may be the IRS. 
Our Olympic medalists will rake in handsome rewards for representing their country, but they will also have to give a chunk back to Uncle Sam in taxes, notes the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation. 
Under U.S. tax law, they must include the value of their Olympic medals and prizes in their taxable income. The precious metal in the medals is worth about $675 for gold, $385 for silver and under $5 for bronze. But medalists take in handsome cash prizes, too: $25,000 for gold, $15,000 for silver and $10,000 for bronze. 
Assuming they're paying the top U.S. tax rate of 35%, that means Olympians would have to shell out $8,750 for winning gold, $5,250 for silver and $3,500 for bronze. 
The British government has waived its right to tax Olympians' winnings, and the ATRF -- research arm for Grover Norquist's ultra-conservative anti-tax group, Americans for Tax Reform -- is publicly taking issue with the idea that U.S. citizens earning money abroad should have to pay U.S. taxes on it, according to Ryan Ellis, tax policy director for the ATR. U.S. policy differs from that of the majority of the world's countries, which don't tax their citizens for income earned abroad. 
(snip) 
With increasing globalization and opportunities to earn abroad, that extra tax bite could actually become a disincentive to people returning to the U.S. to contribute to the domestic economy, Ellis suggests. 
Already, Ellis says, many corporations with subsidiaries in foreign countries shy away from bringing their profits back to the U.S. because to do so would mean paying U.S. taxes on them. 
"You don't have to pay the second tax to the IRS until you actually bring the money back here," Ellis said. "If you leave it overseas, the tax is deferred indefinitely. Our current system incentivizes people to stay overseas." 
But Corporations Aren't People
A closer look at this argument reveals a fairly obvious apples-to-oranges comparison being made by Ellis and the ATR: There's a big difference between how individuals and corporations are treated when it comes to taxable foreign income, as the White House's National Economic Council (NEC) makes clear. 
An American citizen who earns up to $95,100 overseas pays only the foreign taxes on that income. If he earns more than that, he pays U.S. taxes only on the amount earned above that threshold. More importantly, the taxpayer gets a U.S. tax credit for taxes paid to other governments. The result should be that, at worst, someone earning money overseas should pay no more overall than if all money had been earned here, and all the taxes in question were paid to the IRS. (And, thanks to loopholes in the system, it often works out that those workers pay less, the NEC notes.) 
Corporations, by contrast ... well, that's more complicated, but the NEC website concisely explains the issue:  
Companies Can Defer Paying Taxes on Overseas Profits Until Later, While Taking Tax Deductions on Their Foreign Expenses Now: 
  • Currently, a company that invests in America has to pay immediate U.S. taxes on its profits from that investment. But if the company instead invests and creates jobs overseas through a foreign subsidiary, it does not have to pay U.S. taxes on its overseas profits until those profits are brought back to the United States, if they ever are. Yet even though companies do not have to pay U.S. taxes on their overseas profits today, they still get to take deductions today on their U.S. tax returns for all of the expenses that support their overseas investment.
And it's questionable as to whether upholding a "territorial taxation" system -- in which taxes are paid only to the jurisdictions where the money is earned -- would benefit the U.S. economy, the NEC says. 
"Pure territorial taxation is a $200 billion tax incentive for increasing jobs overseas, not for creating jobs in America," Principal Deputy NEC Director Jason Furman told DailyFinance.
Right now, an American multinational corporation will pay 12% in taxes in China, for example, and nothing to the U.S. If after five years, it decides to bring those profits back to the U.S., it will pay 23% on the earnings -- equaling the top U.S. tax rate of 35%, and never exceeding it.
"The notion that there's a double tax is completely absurd," Furman said. 
And in reality, the NEC says, many U.S. corporations opt for added taxing flexibility by having a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands who will own the intellectual property and allow the company to pay only 2% in taxes. Some corporations will never bring that money back to the U.S.

Excerpt:  Read More at Daily Finance

Saturday, August 4, 2012

Michigan's Republican Governor Snyder Touts Emergency Manager Law

I am speechless that a Republican Governor would sign this bill into law passed by a Republican Legislature.  The Emergency Manager of the Muskegon Heights school district converted the school district to a charter system run by a private company.  That means someone appointed by the Governor as the Emergency Manager has a right to come into an entity like a school district, oust the school board, and change them from a public school to a charter school.  The Emergency Manager for Detroit schools has set the ceiling of  61 students in a classroom.  How is a teacher in the public schools supposed to handle 61 students.  

Knew that Michigan had economic problems due to the downturn of jobs but this has turned into a dictatorship type governing throwing out elected public officials.  The fact that the Governor has the power to appoint this Emergency Manager blows my mind.  

Yesterday the Michigan Governor Snyder was touting this new law before the Michigan Supreme Court said the petitions could go forward to have an election on this bill in November.  The Election Board had thrown out the petitions because the font size changed.  What is going on with Republicans who were elected in 2010?  Thought Republicans were about democracy but this is an example of someone who never should have been elected which is what some longtime Republicans were saying but the Tea Party came in, spent a lot on ads, and lied about other candidates.  Now I know my initial reaction to Snyder was right.  

When you read this, you are left with wondering how these people can get by with passing a law that takes away the elected officials in a public entity, install one person who can sell and do whatever they want with the entity, and nothing the citizens can do.  Is this what the far right takeover of the Republican Party is all about?  To get their people in place even if they have to resort to removal of duly elected officials?  This is scary that is is happening in Michigan.  What state is next up for the members of the far right Tea Party?

There is an emergency–an emergency for democracy. 
Public Act 4, a law passed by Republican majorities in the Michigan Legislature in March 2011, gives Gov. Rick Snyder power to appoint an emergency manager for any city, town, village or school district in Michigan undergoing a “financial emergency.”The State of Michigan itself admits in official exhibits it released to the court in the Summary of Arguments:
“Con — This bill allows the emergency managers too much power and control over local units of government. Emergency managers can’t be trusted to act in the interests of the local nut and will use the enhanced powers granted under this bill for their own gain. Stripping local officials of the powers is anti-democratic.”
Read more about the challenge to the Emergency Manager Law (Public Act 4) that Sugar Law Center is leading.
Usually when I see the term Social Justice I have a negative reaction but in this instance they are doing the right thing.  No state should have a law on this books like this that gives the Governor way too much power.
Michigan Supreme Court: Put emergency manager law on the ballot 
Fri Aug 3, 2012 2:21 PM EDT 

Delivering signed petitions in February. 
The voters of Michigan will get a say on the state's emergency financial manager law. In a 4-3 decision, the state supreme court ruled today that the petition drive met the requirements and should be certified for the November election. That petition had been challenged by a group based in the office of a member of the elections board that rejected it. The challenge alleged that the type on one line of the petition was not 14 point. The court ruling is remarkably technical (pdf) -- font nerds, skip to page 18 for the time of your lives -- and the most exciting part might be this: 
In the present case, plaintiff used 14-point Calibri font for its petition heading, as attested to by plaintiff's printer. 
Today's ruling means that the emergency manager law will go on ice, after it's officially certified, until the referendum this fall. That has large and potentially confusing implications for the towns and school districts the state has taken over under the law. 
What happens to the Muskegon Heights school district, which a new emergency manager just converted to a charter system run by a private company? Who's in charge in Benton Harbor, where elected officials have been stripped of all power and a blizzard of recall attempts is underway? Do Detroit schools have to keep their new ceiling of 61 kids in a class, as ordered by the emergency manager? For that matter, does Detroit still have to slash its city workforce under the consent agreement they signed to avoid getting an emergency manager? 
However the answers turn out, the campaign to repeal the emergency manager law can now begin. By dragging the matter out this long – the petition could have been certified back in April -- supporters of the law have taken away weeks that the repeal effort could scarcely afford to lose. The repeal side is trails by 10 points in the polls, but there are twice that many undecided voters for their campaign to try to reach.
  

Friday, August 3, 2012

Do Nothing Congress on Recess Until the 10th of September

Will someone please explain to me why Congress gets so many days off?  Don't tell me it is to meet with their constituents as only a few Town Halls get scheduled every year.  Used to say it was a good thing for Congress to get out of DC but this group has accomplished so little, they should have stayed.

Congress Heads Out for Recess
First Read: "For those who have departed on their August recess, we salute you -- for going down as one of the most unproductive, contentious, and unpopular Congresses in modern history. So in addition to last summer's debt-ceiling debacle, the Super Committee's failure, and the near-government shutdown during 2011, Congress has failed to come together to pass a comprehensive farm bill. and Senate Republicans yesterday filibustered a cybersecurity bill." " 
So here's your current Congress: Republicans are working to block or dismantle laws; Democrats are focusing on protecting what's already law; and no one is getting stuff done. As we wrote earlier this week, one of the most profound changes on Capitol Hill is the job requirement. It's no longer about bringing home deliverables to your state or congressional district (like roads, bridges, or new schools). Instead, it's about scoring ideological points and waging partisan crusades."

How many of you are getting a 5 week vacation in August or have had the additional days that the House has had off in 2012?  Bet the answer to that is zero, zip, nada!  As you can see below the August recess is on top of a lot of other days off.  

The following chart is your tax dollars at work -- no wonder Congress gets an 11% rating which may be too high.  

Days in session are in red (graphical browsers) 
Source: Calendar of the House of Representatives

JANUARY 2012FEBRUARY 2012MARCH 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12345671234123
89101112131456789101145678910
151617181920211213141516171811121314151617
222324252627281920212223242518192021222324
2930312627282925262728293031
APRIL 2012MAY 2012JUNE 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSat
12345671234512
89101112131467891011123456789
151617181920211314151617181910111213141516
222324252627282021222324252617181920212223
2930272829303124252627282930
JULY 2012AUGUST 2012SEPTEMBER 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSat
123456712341
8910111213145678910112345678
15161718192021121314151617189101112131415
222324252627281920212223242516171819202122
29303126272829303123242526272829
30
OCTOBER 2012NOVEMBER 2012DECEMBER 2012
SunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSatSunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234561231
78910111213456789102345678
14151617181920111213141516179101112131415
212223242526271819202122232416171819202122
2829303125262728293023242526272829
3031


The House is still holding up roads and bridges because they don't want to see jobs added before the November election in the states.  In Senate the GOP wants Repeal of the Affordable Healthcare Act by attaching it to the Cyber Security Bill which is a bill even the Tech community thinks we need.  As I have said before, what does the AHA have to do with Cybersecurity which is nothing.  It is part of the strategy of Minority Leader McConnell and his lapdogs except for a few to make sure no legislation is passed in the Senate that would help Obama in his reelection bid.  

This group of Republicans has used the filibuster more than anyone can remember by a lot.  They obviously don't care about doing the work of the American people as they do the work of Romney who is more important then the rest of us.  After all he is going to take out that evil President they have managed to demonize with lies, taking statements out of contexts, and mistruths to the stage, why would anyone believe what Republican leadership says in Congress?

Had to remove the quotes I had on this site attributed to Obama because the first ones when I looked  past the initial source, it turned out they were cherry picked by conservative sites to make his 'quotes' mean something entirely different then what he said as a whole statement.  Didn't bother wasting my time checking the rest.

Since January 2011, the whole purpose of the Republicans in the Congress has been to make sure they don't pass anything that would make Obama look good or add jobs so they can help Romney win.  They could care less about the American people especially the middle class, minorities, and women.  Republicans in the House are standing by their made up comments that the wealthy create the jobs which is not true today as the wealthy have sent jobs overseas so they can make more money with outsourcing.  Small business owners the majority of who makes less than $250,000 a year are the job creators today as manufacturing jobs have been outsourced.  House Republicans refuse to pass an extension of the Bush tax cuts for everyone making under $250,000 and for the first $250,000 for the wealthy who can take all kinds of deductions like Romney did for his dressage horse of $77,000 for expenses.  Wonder when I can figure out a way to take Chewie and Eddie off my income tax?  

Let's not forget that House Republicans have voted 33 times since taking over in January of 2011 to repeal Obamacare at a cost of $50 million.  What is a few million when you are doing the work of the Tea Party even though you know the bill is going to 'nowhere' just like the bridge to nowhere.


Then there is the issue of franking by members of Congress.   Remember how Republicans yelled at abuse of franking by Democrats to send out letters?  Now the Republican Conference has adopted the same waste of tax dollars to send out email if the letter received by my husband yesterday is any indication as it is nothing but a political advertisement disguised as form letter correspondence from the Congressman with his signature copied:

Obamacare*
  • Creates $675 billion in new taxes
  • Forces 3-5 million Americans off their employer-provided health insurance
  • Cuts $500 billion from Medicare
The President's Economic Policy*
  • Increases taxes by $4.3 trillion over the next 10 years if current tax rates expire
  • Slashes defense spending by nearly $500 billion
  • Increases spending by $1.5 trillion
  • Adds $11 trillion to the national debt in the next decade
Legislation Passed by House Conservatives*

  • Cuts spending by $5 trillion
  • Approves the Keystone pipeline to create over 100,000 new jobs
  • Reforms the tax code to eliminate unfair loopholes and keep American competitive
  • Preserves vital defense capaibilities
  • Eliminates unnecessary government regulations and costs that stifle job creation
  • Lowers gas prices through an all-of-the-above energy strategy
  • Repeals Obamacare to keep Americans in charge of our own health care decision
  • Extends tax relief fo all American families and small business
*House Republican (Conservative) Conference

This little note appears at the bottom of the form letter in small print (my bold):
This mailing was prepared, published and mailed at taxpayer expense.
It is provided as a service to constituents
The remainder of the letter is just feel good words but noted that there is not one source they have linked for facts.  The information comes from the House Republican/Conservative Conference which is rhetoric.  Nothing linked to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) findings which are facts.  Yet I am supposed to swallow all of this because it came from a Congressman?  House Republicans IMHO are wasting my tax dollars sending this form letter out all across America.

Yet these same people are wondering why like longtime Republicans like me have had it.  Look no further then the topic 'Legislation Passed by House Conservatives' not Republicans but Conservatives.  No wonder members of the Republican Party who are not arch conservatives are leaving Congress.  They are not wanted as part of the Cantor/Bachmann Tea Party Conservative conference.  America needs to wake up and realize going too far left or right is not good for the Country.  Actually my rights as a woman are being abused more by the Conservatives in the House then by the Democrats.

Noted in this letter that the 'Conservative' Conference failed to mention the Keystone Pipeline for the southern part which was approved by Obama.  I would like to see the magic hat they pulled the info for Obamacare from as well as now seeing the Defense Department is down to $500B not $1 trillion to be cut.  I bet a lot of us could find $50B to cut out of the defense budget for ten years running with little trouble.  They also neglected to say they want tax cuts extended for the wealthy.  I could go on but you get the point -- House Republicans used taxpayer dollars to send out what is essentially a campaign form letter.  The USPS could have used the money.

The ethics and integrity of Republicans has been replaced by hatred of this President where it has become more important to stall bills that would help Americans find jobs in order to make President Obama look bad on the economy then it is to work for all their constituents.  This hatred of the President in the House has made them refuse to work across the aisle for the good of all Americans.

IMHO the blame for this economy today not recovering like it should be lies right in the laps of a lot of Republicans in the House and Senate who are stalling legislation to get people back to work so Romney can defeat Obama.  Excuse me as I should have said Conservatives not Republicans since they are touting the work of 'Conservatives' not Republicans in this House.  My question is very simple:
"Why would we vote to send this group of do-nothing partisans back to Congress?"