Obama has himself to blame for Muslim problem

When we first learned that Obama had become a 'Christian' at Rev Wright's Church of Christ, we began to question how he could sit in this church for 20+ years and not hear the black separatists message or acknowledge the fact the fact of Wright and Farrakhan's close relationship. If a black Christian minister hanging around together, traveling together, and giving the National of Islam leader Farrakhan an award doesn't make you go 'what?' nothing will.  That is exactly the relationship between Wright and Farrakhan who Obama also knew well.

Then the Obama campaign attacked all of us who questioned whether Obama was Muslim back then as it was common knowledge in Chicago that Rev Wright who was a former Muslim who was open to Muslims coming to his church pretending to be Christian for business purposes.  Why not for political purposes as well?

The fact that the Obama campaign insisted that Hussein, his middle name, not be used during the campaign but after he was elected, they embraced that name was another troubling problem about his link to Islam. Then we had the gotcha moment on ABC where he said Muslim and was corrected to Christian and the beautiful Islamic prayer moment all leading to many of us thinking his loyalties were to Islam, the religion of most of his Kenyan family. Since being elected, we have not changed our opinions and in fact, Obama's words and actions have strengthened our belief if he is not Muslim he leans very much toward the Islamic religion over Christianity and Jewish religions.

Obama has himself to blame for Muslim problem
By: Byron York
Chief Political Correspondent
August 20, 2010
(AP)

In 1985, Barack Obama had just arrived in Chicago for his new job as a community organizer when he headed to Smitty’s Barbershop, a tiny storefront on the South Side. As Smitty cut his hair, Obama listened to the men in the shop talk politics and racial grievance. When the barber finished, he handed Obama a mirror and said, “Haircut’s ten dollars. What’s your name, anyway?”

“Barack.”

“Barack, huh,” Smitty responded. “You a Muslim?”

“Grandfather was,” Obama said, according to his memoir Dreams From My Father.

Smitty’s question, which Obama didn’t exactly answer, prefigured a controversy that continues to this day.

A new poll by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life shows that 18 percent of Americans believe Obama is a Muslim. That is up from the 12 percent who believed that in October 2008, just before Obama was elected president.

At the same time, the number of Pew respondents who say Obama is a Christian — in Dreams From My Father, he describes his conversion to Christianity under the tutelage of Rev. Jeremiah Wright — has declined from 51 percent in October 2008 to 34 percent now. And the number of people who say they don’t know Obama’s religion is growing, from 32 percent back then to 43 percent today.

The White House blames the situation on a “misinformation campaign” from Obama’s opponents. But Obama and his aides might also blame themselves for the way they’ve handled the Muslim issue over the years.

The question did not come out of nowhere. As Obama said, his grandfather was a Muslim. His father was raised a Muslim before becoming, by Obama’s account, “a confirmed atheist.” Obama’s stepfather was a Muslim. His half-sister Maya told the New York Times that her “whole family was Muslim.”

Obama spent two years in a Muslim school in Indonesia and later, in a conversation with the Times’ Nicholas Kristof, described the Arabic call to prayer, the beginning of which he recited by heart, as “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.” Given all that, it is entirely accurate and fair to describe Obama as having Muslim roots.

Read more at the Washington Examiner

You Tube -- Three Things About Islam

Please watch this video for more information about Islam:

Recommended Books for Learning More about Islam

We received this email from Human Events Book Service just a short time ago which fits in perfectly with our last two posts on Islam and the Muslims wanting to build a gigantic mosque at Ground Zero while wanting to be governed by Sharia Law not American Civil Law. You can also purchase these books at Amazon.com, Barnes and Noble, and Borders.

There is no substitute for knowledge that you get from doing research on a subject such as Islam, the religion of Muslim countries. If you want to learn more about Islam, these books will give you an insight to why so many of us are upset they are building this huge mosque near Ground Zero along with other mosque around the Country:

1. The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America
by Andrew C. McCarthy

"Read this book and you'll understand what we're up against and why we have to stop it." -- MARK R. LEVIN

As the Obama administration wavers on the pending trial of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his co- conspirators, a former top federal terrorism prosecutor has issued a stern warning for Americans: "The real threat to the U.S. is not terrorism, but the sophisticated force of Islamism collaborating with the American Left." In The Grand Jihad: How Islam and the Left Sabotage America, highly-decorated retired Justice Department official Andrew C. McCarthy depicts and analyzes how the global Islamist movement's jihad involves far more than just terrorist attacks and why Islamists have found an ideal partner in the American Left and President Barack Obama.

2. Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs
by Robert Spencer

There hasn't been a terrorist attack on U.S. soil since 9/11, and Al-Qaeda is on the run in Iraq -- and yet the terrorist threat is far from over. In fact, it's more severe than ever: in our country Islamic jihad groups and their allies are concentrating not solely on terror attacks (although another one of those could come any moment), but on stealthy efforts to introduce Islamic law into this country, step-by-step and bit-by-bit -- until finally America is transformed into an Islamic state. While the stealth jihadists may never attain this goal, they are already eroding our freedoms as they demand ever more accommodation of Islamic principles and practices -- and politically correct public officials are only too happy to oblige. Now, in Stealth Jihad: How Radical Islam is Subverting America without Guns or Bombs, jihad expert Robert Spencer unveils the full scope of the stealth jihad plan, and explains how the stealth jihadists are operating and the victories they've already achieved.

3. The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran
by Robert Spencer

If we don't know the Koran, we can't defeat the jihadists: Osama bin Laden, the masterminds of 9/11 and those who have perpetrated the over 13,000 jihad attacks worldwide since 9/11 repeatedly point to it as their inspiration and authority, explaining that they're committing acts of terrorism and hate because of it. Yet the Koran is not an easy read -- it has been called "wrist-slittingly boring," as well as confusing, contradictory, and muddled. But Robert Spencer reads the Koran so that you don't have to! Now, in The Complete Infidel's Guide to the Koran, Spencer, the bestselling author and Islam expert, shows exactly what's in the Koran, and why every military and intelligence official -- and every American -- should be concerned about this revered and reviled holy book. This witty and breezily written guide to the Koran explains who those who have vowed to destroy us think they are, what they think they're doing, and what they hope to accomplish.

4. The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to Islam (and the Crusades)
by Robert Spencer

Exclusive hardcover edition -- not available in stores! (soft cover version is still available)

When PC propagandists assure us that jihadist terror doesn't reflect "true," "peaceful" Islam, they're not only wrong, they're dangerous -- because they lull America and the West into letting their guard down against their mortal enemy. And not only do self-appointed "experts" lie elaborately and persistently about Islam -- they have also replaced the truth about Christian Europe and the Crusades with an all-pervasive historical fantasy that is designed to make you ashamed of your own culture and heritage -- and thus less determined to defend it. But now there's a remedy: in The Politically Incorrect Guide™ to Islam (and the Crusades), Robert Spencer reveals all the disturbing facts about Islam and its murderous hostility to the West that other books ignore, soft-pedal -- or simply lie about.

5. Nomad: From Islam to America:
A Personal Journey Through the Clash of Civilizations by Ayaan Hirsi Ali

Ayaan Hirsi Ali first captured the world's attention with Infidel, her bestselling memoir of her childhood in Africa and Saudi Arabia, and of her escape to Holland en route to a forced marriage in Canada. Now, in Nomad, Hirsi Ali tells the story of her subsequent search for a new life in America as she tries to reconcile her Islamic past with her passionate adherence to democracy and Western values. But Nomad is a memoir with a mission: to inform the West of the extent of the threat from Islam, both from outside and from within our open societies.

6. The Life and Religion of Mohammed
by J.L. Menezes

Fr. J.L. Menezes knew Islam up close: as a priest in India, he devoted his priestly life to introducing that nation's tens of millions of Muslims to Christianity. With this life of Mohammed, he left us the record of his appeals: a frank, honest, and exhaustively researched exploration of the life of the "prophet" of Islam, the development and contents of the Koran, and an introduction to various Muslim sects. Working from the earliest Islamic sources, Fr. Menezes provides a complete account of Mohammed's life, from his days as a simple merchant to his triumphs as a leader of armies and revered prophet. Menezes delved so deeply into his subject that he was even able to describe Mohammed's physical appearance. He explains why Mohammed couldn't possibly be a true prophet, and reveals the true sources of his "revelations." Fr. Menezes could be writing about today's Muslim terrorists when he explains that "Mohammed posed as the apostle of God, the seal of the prophets; as the destroyer of idolatry; as preacher of one true God, and the reformer of morals: while his life is marked by innumerable marriages; and great licentiousness, deeds of rapine, warfare, conquests, unmerciful butcheries, all the time invoking God's holy name to sanction his evil deeds, ordering prayers and alms deeds and at the same time propagating Islam everywhere by fire and sword."

Frank Gaffney: Farewell to Space

Yesterday when we saw the article about NASA Chief Bolden talking about the next frontier for NASA was reaching out to Muslims, we reread the article to make sure what we read was correct. Then we searched for more sources and they all said the same thing.

If anyone had any doubts about the agenda of Barack Obama, they should have no more doubts. He favors spending our tax dollars on outreach to members of Islam in Muslim nations while cancelling major parts of our space program. That says it all to any thinking person.

Words fail at what we would like to post but suffice it say that this is wrong to spend dollars allocated for Space Exploration to reach out to Muslims who many members of Islam want to see this Country destroyed. Is this President one of those? It is a fair question after what we have been seeing out of this White House. He was not raised as a typical American and his favoring the Muslim countries over our allies or even American citizens is not going over well in most parts of the Country.

Questions on a lot of our minds that need answers

Who is the real Barack Obama?
Was he eligible to run for President since he refuses to submit the paperwork showing he was eligible?
Did he ever formally change his name from Barry Sorento?
Did he attend Columbia University using their overseas program to attend college overseas to graduate and is that why no one remembers him at Columbia?
Why was Obama in the 2004 Senate race referred to as a son of Kenya?

The American people deserve answers to these questions which if answered truthfully would tell all we need to know about Barack Obama. We are not holding our breath that the national news media will find out the answers to those questions. Why is anyone running for President allowed to close their records which should be an open book? If you don't want people to know about you, don't run.

Suing Arizona for following the law today and yesterday wasting our tax dollars to fund the space program to reach out to Islam is not what an 'true' American President would do.

Frank Gaffney: Farewell to SpaceJuly 6, 2010

Just when you thought Barack Obama's toadying to Islam could not get any worse, now comes this: The President directed the new administrator of NASA, retired Marine Major General Charles Bolden, as "perhaps [his] foremost" charge to "find a way to reach out to the Muslim world and engage more dominantly Muslim nations to help them feel good about their historic contribution to science...and math and engineering."

This comment came in an interview the NASA chief conducted with al-Jazeera while touring the Middle East to mark the first anniversary of Mr. Obama's much-ballyhooed Cairo paean to Muslims. Bolden elaborated, "It is a matter of trying to reach out and get the best of all worlds, if you will, and there is much to be gained by drawing in the contributions that are possible from the Muslim (nations)."

In an address to the American University in Cairo, Bolden added that Mr. Obama has "asked NASA to change...by reaching out to ‘nontraditional' partners and strengthening our cooperation in the Middle East, North Africa, Southeast Asia and in particular in Muslim-majority nations." He declared that "NASA is not only a space exploration agency, but also an Earth improvement agency."

Now, when one thinks of the "contributions" to our space program that are possible from Muslim nations, the one that comes to mind is the literal kind - recycled petrodollars - since their "contributions to science, math and engineering" for several hundreds of years have been, to put it charitably, underwhelming.

Continue Reading...

Is Political Correctness and a Return to Pre-911 Responsible for Islamic Major Hasan's Terrorist Act at Fort Hood

Our elected officials and media are quick to label a lone suicide bomber who blows himself up in the middle of a group of people an act of terrorism, but we are told by the President not jump to conclusions on this obvious act of terrorism. What's the difference -- Hasan used a gun instead of a backpack to slaughter people?

Three days after we are told not to jump to conclusions, we wake up to this story from ABC that Major Hasan tired to contact al Qaeda. The conclusions that almost everyone jumped are readily becoming confirmed -- he was an Islamic Jihadist even if he was working alone. Hasan had been reported numerous times by his peers about his comments that were anti-American to senior officers but nothing was done. FBI knew about him six months ago and nothing was done. Now we discover he tried to contact al Qaeda -- was he successful?

We have said all along that this was a act of terrorism. When a psychiatrist hands out the Koran and tries to get patients to join Islam while making comments supporting the terrorists against US Troops, then officials should have taken action instead of counseling him. Hasan should have been dishonorably discharged from the Army but we are back to the pre 9/11 mindset it looks like which is dangerous.

Senator Joe Lieberman is correct in calling for an investigation into this act of terrorism. We are so grateful he is heading the Homeland Security Committee which has an investigative unit, and he has the authority to launch an investigation. On this Committee sits Senators John McCain and Tom Coburn so we have complete faith we will learn the truth.

This coddling of people who want to kill us by this Administration needs to stop. Obama reaches out to our enemies and disses our allies. Now we have troops killed and wounded at the hands of an Islamic Jihadist on American soil, and we hear don't jump to conclusions from this President who didn't think anything of jumping to conclusion when his friend, Gates, was arrested. He called the cops stupid.

Hasan complained about Obama because he had said during the campaign he would bring American troops home and why he supported him. When Obama didn't follow through, Hasan got angrier. Maybe on the campaign trail candidates should tell the truth instead of spinning so the American people know where they stand and then let us make a decision.

Officials: U.S. Aware of Hasan Efforts to Contact al Qaeda

By RICHARD ESPOSITO, MATTHEW COLE and BRIAN ROSS
Today (9 Nov 09), 7:53 AM EST

Army Major in Fort Hood killing used 'electronic means' to connect w/ terrorists

U.S. intelligence agencies were aware months ago that Army Major Nidal Hasan was attempting to make contact with people associated with al Qaeda, two American officials briefed on classified material in the case told ABC News.

(snip)

On Sunday, Senator Joseph Lieberman (D-CT) called for an investigation into whether the Army missed signs as to whether Hasan was an Islamic extremist.

"If Hasan was showing signs, saying to people that he had become an Islamist extremist, the U.S. Army has to have a zero tolerance," Lieberman told Fox News Sunday.

Investigators want to know if Hasan maintained contact with a radical mosque leader from Virginia, Anwar al Awlaki, who now lives in Yemen and runs a web site that promotes jihad around the world against the U.S.

In a blog posting early Monday titled "Nidal Hassan Did the Right Thing," Awlaki calls Hassan a "hero" and a "man of conscience who could not bear living the contradiction of being a Muslim and serving in an army that is fighting against his own people."

According to his site, Awlaki served as an imam in Denver, San Diego and Falls Church, Virginia.

The Associated Press reported Sunday that Major Hasan attended the Falls Church mosque when Awlaki was there.

Excerpt: Read More at ABC News

The worst part of this ABC article comes from the politically correct Army Chief of Staff who is following in the steps of the President.

In listening to the military analyst on the news after this tragedy, it became clear that political correctness has become the norm in the US Army. Officers complained about Hasan and his support of Islamic terrorist. One person interviewed had actually been in a meeting with Hasan when he spouted his Islamic rantings and reported him but nothing was done. That seems to be normal response by the Army to complaints on Hasan except to counsel him he shouldn't try to convert patients. They promoted him to Major, gave him a low rating, and then shipped him off to Fort Hood to be deployed.

The blood of these men and women who were killed is on the hands of the superior officers that were told about his Islamic rantings beginn with his medical schooling, internship, residency, and career who no action. They received complaints from patients on his trying to convert them to Islam but their reaction was more counseling for Hasan. Was it because he was Muslim they wouldn't take action? Pretty poor excuse to tell the friends and families of the people killed and wounded.

Army Chief of Staff

A fellow doctor who studied with Hasan, Val Finell, told ABC News, "We would frequently say he was a Muslim first and an American second. And that came out in just about everything he did at the University.

Finell said he and other Army doctors complained to superiors about Hasan's statements.

"And we questioned how somebody could take an oath of office…be an officer in the military and swear allegiance to the constitution and to defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic and have that type of conflict," Finell told ABC News.

The Army Chief of Staff, General George Casey, raised concerns over the weekend that innocent Muslim soldiers could suffer as a result of the shooting at Fort Hood.

"I think the speculation (on Hasan's Islamic roots) could potentially heighten backlash against some of our Muslim soldiers," he said on ABC's "This Week."

Words almost fail me at this moment after reading what the Army Chief of Staff said. Our men and woman in the Army are a lot smarter then he gives them credit as they are not about to attack someone based on the religion. This Major gave signs for years and actually stated that he put Islamic Law ahead of the United States Constitution but his superiors did nothing except finally send him to Fort Hood for deployment. He was never physically attacked even with spouting his Islamic nonsense of choosing Islam over America. What bothers us is the Army wanted to deploy an obvious Islamic radical into the Middle East which makes no sense.

Some of the media have tried to say post traumatic stress syndrom (PTSD) was the cause of his snapping -- was that the White House spin they were reporting? One small problem, actually more then one, as Hasan was never in combat and held these same beliefs while he was still in medical school and they only got worse. Fellow officers reported his statements to superior officers who seemed to file it away with action or just counseling.

He knew exactly what he was doing from all accounts. But yet we are told "Don't Jump to Conclusions." Excuse us, but we will continue to believe whether he did this on his own or at the request of a terrorist organization, he was still a Islamic Jihadist that wanted to kill as many American soldiers as he could in a short period of time. In our opinion this was his way of carrying out Islamic Law over the U.S. Constitution.

Hasan needs to receive the death penality but will this politically correct Administration and Army have the nerve to give him that or will they come up with lame excuses why he shouldn't be excuted. Time will tell!

Obama's Response to Fort Hood Shooting Under Scrutiny

Why Obama referenced the 'Congressional Medal of Honor' as a shoutout to a person Obama gave the Presidential Medal of Freedom from Obama is mind boggling. There is absolutely no connection to the two, yet we are supposed to believe the President doesn't even know the difference?

His reaction to the Islamic Major Hasan who shot and killed 13 people at Fort Hood and wounded another 30 was shocking. Who is Obama protecting?

Today Obama said not to jump to conclusions. Guess he doesn't want the American people connecting dots that this massacre was done by an Islamic fundamentalist that was admonished not to try and convert patients to Islam. Yet he was promoted and was a member of the Homeland Security Transition Team for Obama. Since the FBI knew about him six months ago, we would like to know why no one in chain of command did a thing. Was it because he was a member of the Obama Transition Team?

From the names that have been released he killed and wounded civilians not just military members. One was a pregnant woman.

Our thoughts and prayers go out to the Fort Hood community as they deal with what happened yesterday.

Obama's Response to Fort Hood Shooting Under Scrutiny
Fox News
11-06-09

Critics say that the tone and brevity of Obama's remarks on Fort Hood 'did not appreciate the gravity of what he represents' while others say he had the right presidential instincts.

As the U.S. military and law enforcement were scrambling to save lives after a deadly shooting rampage at Ft. Hood, Texas, President Obama opened his remarks Thursday with a two-minute "shout out" to audience members who attended the Tribal Nations Conference hosted by the Interior Department.

Obama's initial comments on the shooting that killed 13 and wounded scores of others came at the conclusion of Thursday's conference, which was attended by leaders from several of the 564 federally recognized American Indian tribes.

"I planned to make some broader remarks," he told the crowd. "But as some of you might have heard there has been a tragic shooting at the Fort Hood Army base in Texas."

The president's words on the deadly rampage came two minutes after he gave a "shout out" to an audience member and stressed the need to pass health care reform.

"I hear that Dr. Joe Medicine Crow was around, and so I want to give a shout out to that Congressional Medal of Honor winner. It’s good to see you," he said.

Excerpt: Read more at foxnews.com

Fort Hood Shooter Regularly Described War on Terror as "War on Islam"

We would like to know why the Feds did not move forward on complaints about this Major including his radical postings on some of the terrorists sites. Has political correctness trumped the need to protect our military on a military base. As was pointed out on the radio today that most news outlets don't want you to know this Major was a member of Islam and as the article states put Islam first and America second. He had a history of being unable to deal with patients so why did the Army promote him when he had a bad rating?

Too many questions, too few answers, and spinning going on for most Americans. For Obama to say not to jump to conclusions on this Major after his (Obama's) immediate attacks on police this summer strike us as more protection for a member of Islam. After his speech yesterday where he ignored the shooting for several minutes, most Americans are not interested in having him tell us not to jump to any conclusion.

Fort Hood Shooter Regularly Described War on Terror as "War on Islam"
jihadwatch.org ^
November 6, 2009 staff

Islamic jihadists routinely characterize anti-terror efforts as part of a "war on Islam." But of course, there is no war on terror, and there is no war on Islam. There is just the Islamic jihad against the U.S. and the West. "Hasan Called War on Terror 'War Against Islam,' Classmate Says," by Justin Blum for Bloomberg, November 6:

Nov. 6 (Bloomberg) -- Major Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist accused of killing 13 people and wounding 30 others at the Fort Hood Army Base in Texas, regularly described the war on terror as "a war against Islam," according to a doctor who was in a graduate program with him. While studying for a masters degree in public health in 2007, Hasan used a presentation for an environmental health class to argue that Muslims were being targeted by the U.S. anti-terror campaign, said Val Finnell, a classmate.

"He was very vocal about the war, very upfront about being a Muslim first and an American second," said Finnell, 41, a preventive medicine doctor in Los Angeles, in an interview today. "He was always concerned that Muslims in the military were being persecuted."...

Obama favors an unholly alliance between Marxism and Islam

Ted Belman - 4/5/2008

In "Obama’s Muslim connection"I wrote, that Obama’s foreign policy favours accommodation to Islam. Here's more information about the Democrats' likely nominee:

1 He surrounded himself with advisers who believe that US foreign policy is controlled by Jews and this must end.
2. Obama plans to organize a Muslim summit
3. Obama Defends Columbia’s Ahmadinejad Invite
4. Obama; I Would Still Meet With Ahmadinejad
5. Obama: Don’t Stay in Iraq Over Genocide
6. Barack Obama Would Let Shoaib Choudhury Die
7. “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds change in an ugly direction”. BARACK OBAMA from The Audacity Of Hope which is titled in Indonesia “Assualt Hope: From Jakarta To The Whitehouse”?. It is arguable that “Assault Hope” means “Jihad”.
8. Obama’s Nation of Islam Staffers
9. Obama Served On Board That Funded Pro-Palestinian Group
10. Obama - Rezko - Auchi - Saddam Hussein?
11. Obama’s Church Gives Platform to Hamas Terrorists, Questions Israel’s Legitimacy
12. Obama absented himself from the Senate when Senate names Iran’s army “terrorist organization“ but later said he was opposed.
13. Obama’s Iraq War
14. “Bomb Pakistan”

Apparently he wants to get out of the war in Iraq and increase the war in Afghanistan. Maybe I missed the point. He wants to kill al Qaeda in Pakistan but leave them to take over in Iraq? Maybe I still don’t get it. Maybe he wants to bomb with much “collateral damage” rather than invade and occupy. He did say last summer, something to the effect that the United States cannot use its military to solve humanitarian problems and that preventing a potential genocide in Iraq isn’t a good enough reason to keep U.S. forces there.

What have we to make of his overall foreign policy goals. To understand where he wants to lead the US and with what principles, we must look to his chief foreign policy adviser, Zbigniew Brzezinski.

Prof. Paul Eidelberg, Foundation for Constitutional Democracy, asks in Brzesinsky/Obama Axis

I. Who is Zbigniew Brzezinski?It was reported in the New York Sun on February 15 that Barack Hussain Obama has chosen Zbigniew Brzezinski to advise him on Middle East policy.

One does not have to read Carter’s Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid to know that Carter is an anti-Semite . Brzezinski has earned the same reputation.
Not only has Brzezinski publicly defended the anti-Semitic canard that the relationship between America and Israel is the result of Jewish pressure, but he also signed a letter demanding dialogue with Hamas, whose charter calls for Israel’s destruction. It behooves us to understand the mentality of Obama’s Middle East adviser—and more deeply than our so-called experts.

[..] Not only did Brzezinski reject the “black-and-white” image of the American and Soviet forms of government, he rejects the very notion of good and bad regimes! If you are shocked by Brzezinski’s moral relativism, ponder Prime Minister Ariel Sharon’s confession in an interview with Ha’aretz in 2002 that his son Omri taught him “not to think in terms of black and white”—a statement uttered while suicide bombers were reducing Jews to body parts.

The influence of political scientists like Brzezinski is wide and deep. His moral relativism or neutrality prompts politicians to negotiate with and appease terrorist regimes. Mr. Obama may not be a moral relativist, but with Brzezinski as his adviser, he will be more disposed than other presidential candidates to appease Iran. Nor is this all.

With Brzezinski advising him, Obama’s chant about CHANGE may be more serious and insidious than Hillary’s silly utterances. He may have in mind changing the fundamental character of the American regime. That would fit well with the designs of one of his backers, billionaire George Soros, a globalist committed to the termination of the nation-state and the ascendancy of world government.
Since Brzezinski is a moral or historical relativism, he denies the existence of objective or trans-historical standards for determining whether the way of life of one nation, group, or individual is morally superior to that of another.
Brzezinski views history through the lens of Marxism, which, despite its atheism, has much in common with Islam. Both Communism and Islam are universalistic ideologies that reject the idea of the nation-state. Both do not regard adherence to treaties between nations as obligatory. Both Communism and Islam are militaristic and expansionist creeds that do not recognize international borders. Brzezinski’s globalism has become evident in Jimmy Carter. Under Brzezinski’s influence, Carter lowered the defense budget and pursued a soft line toward the Soviet Union. We can expect an Obama White House to pursue a very soft line toward Islam.

II. Iran’s Vision: A World Without Israel and the United States

With Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security adviser, it was Jimmy Carter who facilitated the return of Ayatollah Khomeini to Iran. The Carter-Brzezinski axis is very much responsible for the Islamic revolution—the most dangerous revolution that has occurred in human history, a revolution that threatens the existence of every nation-state.

As a crypto-Marxist, Brzezinski deplores the nation-state . His book Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, declares that “With the splitting and eclipse of Christianity man began to worship a new deity: the nation . The nation became a mystical object claiming man’s love and loyalty. The nation-state along with the doctrine of national sovereignty fragmented humanity . It could not provide a rational framework within which the relations between nations could develop.” Brzezinski sees the nation-state as having only partly increased man’s social consciousness and only partially alleviated the human condition.

“That is why Marxism,” he contends, “represents a further vital and creative stage in the maturing and man’s universal vision.” Marxism, he says, “was the most powerful doctrine for generating a universal and secular human consciousness.” Embodied in the Soviet Union, however, Communism became the dogma of a party and, under Stalin, “was wedded to Russian nationalism. ”

Although Brzezinski poses as a humanist, he makes a most inhumane statement by saying that: “although Stalinism may have been a needless tragedy, for both the Russian people and Communism as an ideal, there is the intellectually tantalizing possibility that for the world at large it was … a blessing in disguise. ” Ponder this shocking statement about Islam or of Islamic imperialism . Yes, it slaughtered more than 200 million people, but Islam brought hundreds of Christian, Jewish, Zoroastrian, Hindu, and Buddhist communities under a single universal vision, that of the Quran.

Brzezinski, a self-professed secularist, is an internationalist whose moral relativism contradicts the moral law or natural rights doctrine of America’s Declaration of Independence. His relativism and internationalism contradict the teachings of the America’s Founding Fathers, who endowed the United States with a national identity and character, the same that animated Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. To put it more bluntly: Brzezinski’s mode of thought or political mentality — like that of countless other American academics — is anti-American. An Obama-Brzezinski axis has revolutionary significance. It might accelerate the de-Americanization and decline of the United States.

This development has its parallel in the de-Judaizing of Israel’s Third Commonwealth. Israel’s ruling elites, beginning with President Shimon Peres, Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, Foreign Minister Tzipi Livini, Education Minister Yuli Tamir—and let’s not forget Israel’s erstwhile and still influential Supreme Court president Aaron Barak—have the same basic mentality as Brzezinski. The mere fact that they are multiculturalists committed to transforming Israel into “a state of its citizens” means that they are only nominal Jews, that just as Brzezinski is, in principle, anti-American, so they are, in principle, anti-Israel or anti-Jewish!
But let us not be misled by the term “multiculturalism.” Multiculturalism means nothing less then the end of the nation-state system that has prevailed for almost four centuries. The nation-state obtained a monopoly of political power. Power abhors a vacuum. Terminate the nation-state and you are heading for world government. But a world government must also have a monopoly of power. Its agents must be everywhere, to make sure that no opposition group in any country secretly develops weapons of mass destruction. A world government must have the equivalent of the KGB in every country. A world government would be the greatest tyranny in human history.

Israel is the target of all those who oppose the nation-state if only because the Bible of Israel not only prescribes a multiplicity of nations, but a moral code that contradicts the moral relativism of the Brzezinskis and of Israel’s ruling elites.
Will Israel be the target of CHANGE — the mantra of the Democratic Party chanted most ominously by Barack Hussain Obama?

It is important to note that when Carter had Brzezinski as his foreign policy adviser, he undermined the Shah paved the way for the Islamic Revolution in Iran, al Qaeda was created to fight the Soviets and Islamist terrorists were supported to destroy Yugoslavia which was a Russian ally. These plans involved Britain, Saudia Arabia and Germany.

Sultan Knish offers us a taste of things to come in his article Zbignew Brezezinksi, Barack Obama and America as the Headless Chicken,
Zbigniew Brzezinski’s plan was to counter the rise of pro-Soviet left wing regimes with a string of Islamic regimes, countering Marxism with Islamism finally culminating in an Islamic overthrow of the USSR (replacing one monstrous regime with another monstrous regime). His dabbling in Afghanistan would eventually give birth to Taliban rule and Osama Bin Laden and September 11th, something he blames Israel and Neo-Cons for. In Iran, Zbigniew Brzezinski backed a policy that would support the Ayatollah Khomeni as America’s new ally.

To show its affinity for the Mullahs, the Carter Administration had lifted a 1978 ban on arms sales to Tehran. The exiled Shah was barred from entering the United States to seek medical treatment. The United States even promised to defend Iran against the Soviet Union. Zbigniew Brzezinski met with the Ayatollah Khomeni’s Prime Minister Mehdi Bazargan and offered the new regime a strategic relationship with the United States. It took five months before a rescue attempt was made and when Zbigniew Brzezinski planned out the disastrous Operation Eagle Claw it was sabotaged from the start by the chains placed on the operation from the Carter White House.
This is an indication of the change Obama wants.

This is the unity he hopes to achieve.

Ted Belman also writes for Israpundit.com

http://www.globalpolitician.com/24434-obama-elections-marxist-islam