"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men
from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
(Thomas Jefferson)


Showing posts with label Sen McCain. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sen McCain. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 2, 2012

Senator John McCain Praises Obama For Afghanistan Trip

Senator John McCain is once again showing the class that every last Senator and Member of the House should show when the President travels overseas no matter the party of the President.  This is about America not Republican or Democrat or who can score points.

Republicans are now acting like none of our Presidents made any trips at all for political purposes which is about as hypocritical as you can get.  What is the most hypocritical is all the comments that Obama was using the Seal Team attack on Bin Laden's compound that end up in the death of Bin Laden when Romney who had absolutely zero to do with any of it goes to a New York fire station to celebrate the one year anniversary of Bin Laden's death.  Romney is a walking hypocrite as in 2007 he said:

Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney criticized Democrat Barack Obama on Friday for vowing to strike al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan if necessary as the Obama camp issued a strident defense of his plan.

"I do not concur in the words of Barack Obama in a plan to enter an ally of ours... I don't think those kinds of comments help in this effort to draw more friends to our effort," Romney told reporters on the campaign trail.
A little over four years ago Romney is saying he would not launch an attack into another Country to strike at al Qaeda but today he says all Presidents would have done that.  The lies just keep coming from Romney but the RNC expects conservatives to just fall in line when we know that Romney should have never run with his liberal baggage and statements.  His campaign and the establishment act like his previous comments meant nothing.  How can you be sure what he believes?
John McCain Praises Obama For Afghanistan Trip
Posted: 05/ 1/2012 5:21 pm Updated: 05/ 1/2012 5:21 pm 
John McCain is "pleased" to learn about President Obama's surprise visit to Afghanistan. Obama arrived in Kabul on Tuesday, the eve of the anniversary Osama bin Laden's death, to meet with President Hamid Karzai about the presence of U.S. troops in the country. He will deliver a televised address from Afghanistan at 7:30 p.m. ET. 
McCain released a statement praising Obama for his commitment to a "a secure and free Afghanistan":   
“I am pleased that the President has traveled to Afghanistan. This is a significant opportunity for him to hear directly from our military commanders and troops on the ground about the significant progress we are making in this fight. 
“It is also important because President Obama and President Karzai will announce the U.S.-Afghanistan Strategic Partnership Agreement, which will define the long-term political, economic, and military commitment between our countries. While I will carefully examine the details of this agreement, I am hopeful that it will send a signal to friends and enemies in the region that the United States is committed to a secure and free Afghanistan. 
“I hope the President's speech tonight will emphasize the degree of our commitment in Afghanistan, rather than the plans for withdrawal. I would urge the President to return from this visit and spend more time speaking directly with the American people about the vital national security interests at stake in Afghanistan and the need for the United States to remain strongly engaged there in the years ahead.” 
Source:  Huffington Post        

Tuesday, September 21, 2010

Frank Gaffney: D-Day for the US military -- Update: White House Supporting Repeal

UPDATE:  Sep 21, 2:03 cdt -- -- The Senate has voted against starting debate on a bill that would repeal the military's "don't ask, don't tell" policy.
*******
UPDATE:  Sep 21, 12:10 cdt, White House issues statement in support of 'Don't ask' repeal

By Roxana Tiron - 09/21/10 10:55 AM ET

The White House on Tuesday morning lent its support to congressional efforts to repeal the ban on openly gay people serving in the military.

As the clock is winding down on a key procedural vote in the Senate that could determine the fate of a massive defense policy bill, the White House issued a statement of administration policy in support of a provision in the defense bill that would repeal the ban known as "Don't ask, don't tell."

The Obama administration supports the provision "as it would allow for completion of the comprehensive review, enable the Department of Defense to assess the results of the review, and ensure that the implementation of the repeal is consistent with the standards of military readiness, effectiveness, unit cohesion, recruiting and retention," the Office of Management and Budget wrote in the statement. "Such an approach recognizes the critical need to allow our military and their families the full opportunity to inform and shape the implementation process through a thorough understanding of their concerns, insights and suggestions."  (DfS Note:  This is a slippery slope if we ever saw one -- this is nothing more than placating the military while going full speed ahead with repeal in our opinion.)

Obama had made a campaign pledge to repeal the Clinton-era law.

Excerpt: Read more at The Hill
**********
Senator McCain is 100% correct to be filibustering this defense authorization bill because of what it contains in addition to the normal authorization which should make every American ill. It is time the Liberal Progressives to quit using bills to further their agenda. We would be saying the same thing if conservatives were doing this on some other agenda. In this case it is the gay agenda at play here by the Obama Administration.

The Center for Security Policy illustrated some issues that would come up if gays were allowed to serve openly in the military. They were part of a memo provided to the DoD from the Center:

•If LGBT individuals are allowed to serve, on what basis could heterosexual male and female personnel be kept apart in accommodations, lavatories and other circumstances in which privacy is limited or non-existent?

•Would officers in command of units be given career-ending negative fitness reports if they truthfully advise their superiors that there are real problems implementing the new LGBT policy - for instance, by disclosing that consensual or non-consensual behavior is undermining morale, discipline and morale?

•How many military chaplains will be penalized for not complying with the new LGBT policy that their religious beliefs tell them is immoral (including performing same-sex marriages, conducting diversity programs that promote LGBT conduct as equivalent to heterosexual conduct, etc)?

•How will housing of same-sex couples be handled on military bases in states that do not recognize such relationships with marriage or civil unions?

Read more examples at Center for Security Policy
All these former military generals (1,167) are speaking out against an open gay policy but the liberal progressives led by Obama/Reid/Pelosi keep pushing it forward.  Do you believe these retired generals or the Administration?  That answer is clear -- the Generals who were responsible for the troops and know what would happen if Don't Ask, Don't Tell was repealed. 

What is wrong with Secretary of Defense Gates that he will not speak out vehemently against this proposal? This wrong and every last freedom loving American who supports our military should be backing McCain with his filibuster of this bill.

Senate Republicans are standing strong on this so please give your encouragement to any who might waffle. BTW, Scott Brown (R-MA) is solidly with John McCain on this issue. Please contact your Senators to let them know how you feel on the issue and to support Senator McCain.

D-Day for the US military
Center for Security Policy | Sep 20, 2010
By Frank Gaffney, Jr.

The United States Senate is scheduled to vote Tuesday on a motion to proceed to debate on the annual defense authorization bill. Normally, such a step is a routine mechanical one. In this case, though, it is one of the most important national security votes of the year - and will be scored as such by the Center for Security Policy and a number of other organizations in their annual legislative scorecards.

As a proud alumnus of the staff of the Senate Armed Services Committee, it pains me to say that the Senate should not consider this seriously defective product of that panel's deliberations. No Republican or Democrat who cares about national security should vote for this motion.

The reason why a filibuster mounted by that committee's ranking Republican, Senator John McCain, should be sustained is that the defense bill is being used as a vehicle for several extraneous political agendas. These include": language allowing military hospitals to be used for the first time in decades as abortion clinics; an amendment Majority Leader Harry Reid says he wants to attach that amounts to an amnesty for young illegal immigrants; and repeal of the 1993 statute prohibiting openly homosexual individuals from serving in the U.S. military.

The last of these is of special concern as it would, in the words of 1167 retired generals and admirals "break" the U.S. military. In time of war, do any U.S. Senators - and most especially those like Sens. Mary Landrieu and Blanche Lincoln who are battling for reelection in conservative states - want to be responsible for such an action?

To be sure, lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) activists insist that there will only be upsides for the military if the law adopted nearly two decades ago after extensive hearings and debate - neither of which has happened this time around - is repealed. They claim the armed forces will not have to dismiss LGBT individuals who come out, or are forced out, of the closet, easing the difficult job of filling the ranks with qualified personnel.

A seven-page memorandum prepared by the superb Center for Military Readiness and provided last week to a Pentagon commission studying the impacts of repeal illuminates myriad ways in which this social experiment would prove incredibly complex, distracting and debilitating for the all-volunteer force in the event the Senate votes down the filibuster. This is especially so if, as the homosexual activists demand, the military adopts a "zero-tolerance" policy towards anyone in uniform who deviates from full acceptance of the LGBT agenda.

Excerpt: Read more at Center for Security Policy

Wednesday, June 30, 2010

Arizona Immigration Law WORKS -- Narcotics agentgs arrest suspected drug cartel member in OKC

Imagine the shock Oklahomans had when this story broke yesterday and today 'The Oklahoman' has more details. Another Mexican drug cartel was set up in Oklahoma infringing on the Mexican cartel that was already in Oklahoma. From the article, this 'suspected' drug cartel member came to Oklahoma AFTER Arizona passed their tough Immigration Bill which mirrored the laws the Federal Government is refusing to enforce.

We applaud Governor Brewer, the Arizona State Legislature, Senators McCain and Kyl, and House Member Rep Flake and others for supporting this immigration bill so vehemently in order to stop illegals from flowing into the Country bringing their drugs and gangs with them.

It is time for the Oklahoma Legislature to pass a more comprehensive and stringent Imigration Bill which mirrors Arizona. All Mexican drug cartel members need in jail or run out of Oklahoma for good. The remainder of the 49 states needs to pass the Arizona bill in their own state legislature to drive the drug runners and Mexican gangs back to Mexico where they belong. Oklahoma already has a stringent Immigration bill on the books but tougher legislation is needed after what we have seen since Arizona passed the bill.

Say NO to illegal immigration order to stop what they are doing to this Country by running drugs and breaking the laws that Attorney General Holder refuses to prosecute. Instead, Holder wants to sue Arizona along with the Mexican President to overturn the law. Holder needs impeached for failing to uphold the Rule of Law starting with the dismissal of charges against the New Black Panthers for voter intimidation caught on tape. Because they are black, they get a pass. Voter intimidation deserves jail time no matter what color of skin or nationality.

Narcotics agents arrest suspected drug cartel member in Oklahoma City

Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control agents said they arrested a suspected Mexican drug cartel leader during a raid Tuesday morning.

BY RON JACKSON Oklahoman
Published: June 30, 2010

Agents arrested a suspected high-ranking Mexican Sinaloa Cartel member in Oklahoma City during a drug raid Tuesday, indicating the organization may be trying to move in on the territory of a rival group, an Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs Control official said.
Officers are shown outside a Mustang home Tuesday after making entry at dawn as part of a multiagency drug raid that targeted meth operations throughout the state. Oklahoma Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drug Control officers teamed with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents and local law enforcement to execute 13 search warrants and 18 arrest warrants.

Narcotics agents arrest suspected drug cartel member in Oklahoma City
The man was described only as a 35-year-old Mexican national. Authorities also didn't release names of others apprehended in the raid, which netted two pounds of methamphetamine, one pound of cocaine and $20,000 in cash.

Bureau Executive Director Darrell Weaver said the man's arrest is the strongest evidence to date that Sinaloa Cartel is trying to move in on the Oklahoma territory of Juarez Cartel.

"This is a disturbing case,” said Weaver, whose agents helped serve 18 arrest warrants and 13 search warrants in an operation that stretched from Tulsa to Elk City. Warrants also were served in Mustang and Norman.

At least nine people ranging from users to suppliers were arrested. The names of those arrested during the sting operation were withheld because they were included in sealed warrants, bureau spokesman Mark Woodward said.

Weaver said he and his agents are alarmed that a second cartel is attempting to make serious inroads into this area.

Undercover agents became aware of their main suspect three months ago, after Arizona passed Senate Bill 1070 — the new immigration law that allows police to search anyone for valid documentation of citizenship.

"Our target received a dispatch from Mexico, and was told to leave Phoenix because of the new immigration law,” said an undercover case agent who asked that his name not be used. "He was told to set up shop in Oklahoma City. Fortunately, in a very short time, we learned of his presence and were able to infiltrate his operation.”

Agents discovered a lucrative operation, and according to the undercover agent, an "established market.” Undercover surveillance revealed that an average of 10 pounds of methamphetamine was being shipped into Oklahoma City a week, Weaver said. Ten pounds of methamphetamine can net $180,000 to $210,000 on the streets, depending on its purity.

The suspect tried to maintain a low profile by living in a gated apartment complex on the city's north side. But Weaver said his agents were able to track "hundreds of thousands of dollars in wire transfers” to Mexico, where the money was being used to buy land.

The narcotics bureau alleges the money was being laundered through a nondescript used car lot in Oklahoma City where people socialized more than they sold cars.

"Our target had a previous conviction for drug possession, and had already been deported once from Arizona,” the undercover agent said. "And still he was trusted to set up an operation in Oklahoma City where he personally moved money. How high up was he? He was one step removed from those on the border who make the orders.

"Now he says he can't cooperate because he has family. He knows he's finished.”
Cindy Cunningham, the agency's chief agent on electronic surveillance intelligence, said the suspect had orders to establish similar operations elsewhere, including Denver and Las Vegas.

Weaver described the case as one of the most troubling of his 23-year drug enforcement career. Agents think Juarez Cartel leaders have been preoccupied by infighting and violence on the border, leaving Oklahoma City open for opportunistic Sinaloa Cartel members.

"We were fortunate to infiltrate this organization within two months of the group setting up shop,” Weaver said. "I believe the Mexican drug cartels are the No. 1 threat to the safety of Oklahomans, and we must be vigilant in our pursuit of these individuals who want to rob everything good we want for our state while making themselves rich.

"This case shows the effects other states' policies can have on the safety of our state.”
Source: http://newsok.com/drug-sting-nets-arrests-of-cartel-suspect-others/article/3472436?custom_click=lead_story_title#ixzz0sLYxpILM

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Mexican President CalderonVisits the White House with a State Dinner Tonight -- Attacks Arizona Immigration Law

Today the Mexican President Felipe Calderon arrived in the United States for a two-day visit with Obama including a state dinner this evening as well as addressing a joint session of Congress tomorrow.

Calderon and Obama blasted the Arizona Immigration bill during welcoming ceremonies. Since Holder and Napolitano have not read the bill, what are the chances that Obama has not looked at it as well but that didn't stop him from attacking the bill as a "misdirected effort."

He also went on to say "Today I want every American to know my administration has devoted unprecedented resources in personnel and technology to securing our border."

What? You could have fooled us as Arizona and Texas have been asking for National Guard along the border for the last year. Senator McCain brought it up in a Meet the Press segment in the spring of 2009. Yet no guard troops and Napolitano has cancelled the contract with Lockheed-Martin for the virtual fence. That is providing unprecedented resources? How about finishing the fence like it is in El Paso, Texas?

The nerve of Calderon to attack the laws of one of our States when the Mexican law on illegals in the Country of Mexico is much tougher.
Under the Mexican law, illegal immigration is a felony, punishable by up to two years in prison. Immigrants who are deported and attempt to re-enter can be imprisoned for 10 years. Visa violators can be sentenced to six-year terms. Mexicans who help illegal immigrants are considered criminals.

The law also says Mexico can deport foreigners who are deemed detrimental to "economic or national interests," violate Mexican law, are not "physically or mentally healthy" or lack the "necessary funds for their sustenance" and for their dependents.
We agree with Cong Steve King of Iowa that the Mexican law makes sense but now Calderon attacks the new Arizona law that doesn't go near as far as the Mexican Law.

Why should the American taxpayers have to support the Mexican illegals in this Country? Does Calderon like the idea of illegals in the United States as they send so much money back to Mexico never giving a thought to the drain they put on states? More important, sounds like Calderon could care less if it costs the United States money to take care of medical care and other expenses for illegals as well as the fact it is costing our own citizens jobs. He seems to be okay with illegals as long as the Mexican Goveernment doesn't have to handle the problem of lack of jobs in Mexico. Why is it the responsibility of the United States to take care of the citizens of Mexico?

The audacity of the two Presidents to attack one of our states for passing a law that 2/3rds of the Country support and mirrors what is already on the federal books which the Federal Government under Obama refuses to enforce. Obama and his Administration have been commenting on the Arizona law now for weeks, and yet they did not take the time to read it before commenting. How long does it take to read 11 pages?

What is stopping the US from enforcing a law similar to Mexico's on illegal immigrants? It is time that the United States stopped playing nurse maid to the illegals from Mexico and their own Government started taking responsibility for their own citizens within their own borders and stop encouraging illegals to find jobs in the United States.

What do you think would happen if we got caught in one of the many speed traps that Arizona Highway Patrol puts out on I-40, I-10, and I-8? First thing the officer is going to do is ask for is a driver's license and then a copy of current insurance for the vehicle. If you don't have that with you, then you are going to be visiting the local judge and explaining why not. How is that different than requiring immigrants to carry their paperwork with them showing they are here legally in this Country? We have immigration laws on the books if you want to come to this Country -- it is not like we are shutting down immigration into the United States.

What is wrong with enforcing immigration laws already on the books and deporting illegal immigrants when they are discovered. They are breaking the law being in this Country yet Obama and the Democrats want to reward their unlawful behavior by giving them amnesty and a path to citizenship. What did the last amnesty do? Made more illegals enter this country hoping for amnesty and a path to citizenship. This is a wrong headed approach to get more Democrat voters which seems to be the aim of a majority of Democrats supporting illegal immigrants.
May 19, 2010
Obama, Calderon Blast Arizona Immigration Law During White House Visit
FOXNews.com

President Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon joined hands Wednesday in blasting Arizona's controversial immigration law, with Obama calling the legislation a "misdirected effort" after Calderon slammed it as discriminatory.

President Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon joined hands Wednesday in blasting Arizona's controversial immigration law, with Obama calling the legislation a "misdirected effort" after Calderon slammed it as discriminatory.

Obama, speaking next to Calderon during Wednesday's state visit, called the tough immigration law a "misdirected expression of frustration over our broken immigration system."

"We're examining any implications especially for civil rights because in the United States of America, no law abiding person -- be they an American citizen, illegal immigrant, or a visitor or tourist from Mexico -- should ever be subject to suspicion simply because of what they look like."

Obama said he has directed the Justice Department to review the law and said he expects to receive a final report soon.

Arizona's law, which takes effect in July, will make it a crime under state law to be in the U.S. illegally

At the start of Wednesday's White House visit, Calderon said the law discriminated against Mexicans and called for the two countries to work together to develop an immigration policy that did not force people to live in the shadows "with such laws as the Arizona law, which is forcing our people to face discrimination."

Calderon, whose remarks were translated from Spanish, said "We can do so if we create a safer border -- a border that will unite us instead of dividing us.

"We are and will continue to be respectful of the internal policies of the United States and its legitimate right to establish, in accordance to its Constitution, whatever laws it approves," he said, "But we will retain our firm rejection to criminalized migration so that people that work and provide things to this nation would be treated as criminals."

Obama also stressed that he and Calderon had directed their governments to make the U.S.-Mexican border more secure and efficient.

"Illegal immigration is down, not up," Obama said, "And we will continue to do whatever is necessary to secure our shared border."

"Today I want every American to know my administration has devoted unprecedented resources in personnel and technology to securing our border," he added.

Fox News
The United States didn't cause this illegal immigrant problem. The corrupt Governments of Mexico did over the years when they looked out for their own personal gain of wealth and not their citizens. It was easier to encourage their citizens to immigrant to the United States illegally then to find a solution to the employment problem in Mexico.

Now with the ongoing drug cartel fights along the border, it is a matter of Border Security. El Paso has gone from a city with major crime to a safe city because they sealed the border with a fence and Border Patrol stations along the fence. If you work in the United States, you don't have any trouble coming across into El Paso with the correct paperwork. What they are keeping out is bringing the drug wars across into El Paso. Terrorists have also targeted the southern borders especially where the border runs through the National Parks and Forests as they have pretty much been declared off limits to law enforcement and their vehicles which has given illegals as well as terrorists a clear shot into the United States where there are no fences.

We found this description of the Border Security from Professor Grayson of William and Mary one of the more honest assessments of the Mexican Government on Border Security.
"I think that some tough love is in order," said George W. Grayson, a government professor at the College of William and Mary. "Obviously cooperation at the border is in our self-interest, but it's time for Mexico's establishment to take possession of the security problem and they simply haven't."
Mexican trucks should not be on American highways as many do not meet truck safety requirements including their tires along with a good portion of the trucks being driven by underage drivers. When the border was opened earlier to Mexican trucks, a series of problems ensued including underage driver's and bald tires for starters. Does the United States want to go that route again? Looks like Obama does. Any truck entering the United States registered in Mexico and countries south should have to pass a strenuous inspection before being allowed on our roads -- same with the drivers.

Touchy issues await Mexican leader's visit
By Kara Rowland

Immigration, trafficking key problems


For the leaders of two friendly nations, President Obama and Mexican President Felipe Calderon have certainly piled up a long list of touchy issues to address when they meet in Washington this week for a state visit.

From Arizona's controversial immigration law to disputes over Mexican trucks to the illicit flow of guns, drugs and people across the border, the U.S. and its southern neighbor are at no loss for thorny challenges.

Foremost among those is the drug war, in which more than 23,000 people have died since Mr. Calderon cracked down on the cartels after taking office in 2006. But policy experts question to what extent the U.S. can — and should — help the embattled nation.

(snip)

Recent and high-profile flare-ups, led by the killing of an American consulate worker in March, have injected a renewed sense of immediacy on the part of the U.S. That incident in particular prompted a trip to Mexico by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, who — echoing the sentiment of Mr. Obama during his visit last year — expressed support for Mr. Calderon's efforts and said the U.S. deserves blame for providing a market for the drugs and supplying weapons to the cartels.

(snip)

On the economic front, Mexico is the nation's third-largest trading partner and sticking points remain when it comes to obligations under the North American Free Trade Agreement, particularly with respect to Mexican trucks. To the chagrin of Mexican manufacturers, the U.S. government has balked at allowing them on U.S. roads, prompting Mexico to retaliate by imposing more than $2 billion in duties on American goods.

But in a sign Mr. Calderon might be able to return home with some good news, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood last week told Congress the administration is about to unveil a new plan that would reopen the border to the trucks.

Excerpt: Read more at Washington Times
Sources have said that Mexican President Calderon is rewriting his speech to the Joint Session of Congress to go after Arizona on its new immigration law. Will the Mexican President whose Government threatened a boycott of Oklahoma earlier because money transfer fees were raised also go after Oklahoma? If Calderon attacks individual states then the Congressional delegations from those states should walk out because he is a guest of the Congress and not his place to attack individual states.

We will see what happens tomorrow when Calderon addresses the Joint Session of Congress. We would take no bets on what he is going to say because he seems to think he can say whatever he wants against the United States and Obama will agree.
Mexican president Felipe Calderón to visit at a tense time
Erin Kelly - May. 17, 2010 12:00 AM
Republic Washington Bureau

WASHINGTON - Mexican President Felipe Calderón's trip to the U.S. Capitol this week comes as Congress is struggling to pass comprehensive immigration reform and the Mexican people are angry at what they see as a harsh new law targeting their countrymen in Arizona.

It also comes amid growing concern by U.S. officials about the violent Mexican drug cartels that smuggle narcotics and people into the United States and weapons and cash into Mexico.

The U.S. already has pledged $1.4 billion to help Mexico fight its drug cartels, and experts say Calderón is likely to ask for more. Calderón launched the war on drugs soon after taking office in late 2006, and the battle has grown increasingly bloody and dangerous. An estimated 20,000 people have died in drug-related violence since then.

While Calderón will undoubtedly emphasize the strong friendship between countries, he also must appeal to his constituents by repeating his condemnation of the Arizona law, which makes it a crime to be in the state illegally. Calderón, whose government issued a travel advisory in the wake of the law, will ask Congress to pass immigration legislation to prevent other states from adopting measures similar to Arizona's, experts say.

"I think we're in a different world than we were before the Arizona law," said Mark Jones, chairman of the political-science department at Rice University in Houston. "Prior to that, President Calderón had done pretty much all he could to stay out of U.S. immigration policy. He was listening to President (Barack) Obama's assurances that he was working on reform and that it would be counterproductive for the Mexican president to weigh in on that.

"But this law has really outraged Mexicans, and President Calderón can't go to Washington without President Obama at least assuring him he will do everything possible to get reform legislation through this year," Jones said.

Early reports were that Calderón's speech Thursday to a joint session of Congress would focus on fighting cartels and opportunities for Mexico and the U.S. to work together on renewable-energy projects, said Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, director of the Center for U.S.-Mexican Studies at the University of California-San Diego.

Now, Calderón reportedly is rewriting the speech to take on the Arizona law, he said.

Read more: Arizona Central