"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men
from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
(Thomas Jefferson)


Showing posts with label House GOP. Show all posts
Showing posts with label House GOP. Show all posts

Thursday, November 29, 2012

House Republican Committee Chairman are all White Males except One of Arab Descent -- No Women!

























There is a reason that sometimes the GOP is called the Stupid Party.  House GOP has now lived up to that title.  Are they serious that they could not find one woman or minority to lead a House Committee?  (NOTE:  It has been pointed out that Daryl Issa (R-CA) who heads the Investigation Committee is of Arab descent.) Their Bravo Sierra about Women chosen for the House Conference made me burst out laughing as it is so lame.  The Conference does not control legislation and what bills are passed.  If you ask me, they gave these crumbs to women thinking no one would notice.
A House Republican leadership aide declined to comment on the lack of diversity in the party's committee leadership. The aide noted, though, that GOP leaders just put four women in party leadership. Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash) is the new House Republican Conference Chair, Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kansas) is conference vice chair, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-N.C.) is conference secretary, and Rep.-elect Ann Wagner (R-Mo.) will represent freshman members in party leadership.
To reelect the same leadership in the House that has been so obstructionists including giving a waiver to Rep Paul Ryan (R-WI) to continue to head the Budget Committee shows they have no plans to change their obstructionist tactics even though they lost 11 seats and only kept control of the House because of huge gerrymandering in the states.  The same gerrymandering they accuse the Democrats of doing but they took it to a new low.

Went to see the "Lincoln" movie several nights ago and was struck at how Republicans in those days were defending the rights of slaves to be free as President Lincoln was not sure that The Emancipation Proclamation would hold up in Court after the Civil War ended.  There were liberties taken with history as there are with all historical based movies, but this movie was powerful in the way the Democrats fought tooth and nail against giving slaves equal rights and the Republicans pushed the equal rights.  Some Republicans wanted the newly freed slaves to have voting rights which did not come until the next century.  Today it is the Democrats pushing Civil Rights and the Republicans pushing voter suppression to keep minorities from voting.

What happened to the Republicans of Dwight Eisenhower years where he started the integration of schools across America which was pushed by the Republican Party.  Martin Luther King was a Republican during Eisenhower's Administration.  In a little over 50 years, the Republican Party has gone so far hard right to an anti-minorities and women stance so that I don't recognize GOP of 2012.  In the 1950's, you would never hear about the earth being 5,000 years old or other nonsense that comes out of the creationists who seem to have taken over the GOP of today putting people on the science committee like Rep Paul Broun Jr. (R-GA) who believes in creationism.  What is he doing on the Science Committee?

Over the Thanksgiving holiday, we went to the Ed Noble Museum of Natural History on the University of Oklahoma campus.  It is highly acclaimed as one of the leading Natural History Museums in the United States with their vast collection of specimens.  The Museum takes you through at the beginning on how they categorize their finds and date the fossils that are found.  It is one of the most interesting places you can visit if you believe the earth is more than 5,000 years old.  In actuality, the earth and the other planets of our solar system are dated at approximately 4.5 billions years old.

The oldest rock formations on Earth are between about 3.8 and 3.9 billion years old., but there are older bits of more ancient rocks that were incorporated into these early rocks, and they date to something closer to 4.4 billion years old. These and other early materials are dated primarily using a variety of parent-daughter radiometric techniques, with the most effective for this time period being a lead-lead system. 
Since rock from the time of the Earth’s formation isn’t available (because it didn’t really exist or was gobbled up in the fiery beginnings of the big round ball) the preferred method of dating the Earth is to calculate the age of meteorites. The earliest meteorites essentially date the condensation of materials in the solar system into the planets, and thus, the date of these meteorites indicates the date of the early Earth. (The Earth existed prior to this condensation in the form of whatever parts of the early solar nebula would eventually condense into this particular planet, of course.) 
Personally don't want Creationism taught in the public schools because it flies in the face of science with the interpretation by evangelicals on the age of the earth being 5,000 to 7,000 years old.  That makes no sense at all.  Is that why so many Republicans are pushing charter schools so their theories can be taught since those charter schools are privately owned?  In Oklahoma the other year at the Convention, the GOP Platform wanted the Bible taught in public schools.  I was shocked that they had gone that far right but as I learned in 2012, it is not only Oklahoma Republicans but the National Party that has gone hard right even defining the meaning of the word rape and person hood.

Get the feeling that the Republican Party is regressing not moving forward after the 2012 election.  Will they remain the Stupid Party aligned with Grover Norquist who says no new taxes or will they wake up to the fact that Republicans are an endangered species if they don't change.  They cannot remain a viable party from the hard right where social issues rule along with their stance on illegal immigration.  America is moving forward and want the parties to work together for the benefit of all Americans not just the top 2% that the GOP leadership is protecting.

Has Republican Leadership in the House put major donors over what is good for the vast majority of Americans?  Sure looks like it.  Will they change and come to the negotiations in good faith?  Maybe it is 50/50 or even less.  All the House has to do is pass the Senate bill that keeps the tax cuts for everyone making under $250,000 and work out details on the people making over $250,000 later.  That Senate bill should have been passed immediately upon their return to Congress after the lengthy recess.  The very fact that the House Leadership refuses to budge and pass that bill shows that Grover Norquist still controls the House GOP when it comes to raising taxes.  The GOP has plenty of rhetoric they use all the time but are they really changing?  Sure doesn't look like they have any intention of losing their obstructionists ways anytime soon or being on the hard right of the political spectrum.

Are the American people going to have to wait until 2014 to get real leadership in the House and Senate from Republicans.  Senator Mitch McConnell (R-KY) who is the Senate Minority Leader is still giving the same rhetoric like they won.  There were 23 Democrat Senate seats they had to defend and they held their seats plus picked up two seats which means of the ten seats the GOP had to defend, they lost two.  That is a huge loss.  In the House, they only won by gerrymandering as the popular vote went to the Democrat candidates.  Have Congressional Republicans learned their lesson?  From what I am seeing, I would say that would be a very loud NO!  In fact, I don't think the GOP has learned their lesson but are trying to put a new face on the same old rhetoric.

We need two viable parties in this Country but the Republicans are forcing more and more Republicans to leave the Party with their hard right stance.  The jury is out on whether they have the capability to track back to the center right and jettison the hard right.  If I was a betting, I would say that is not happening because the hard right seems to be going no where except to destroy the GOP by their hard right agenda where white males are superior to everyone.


Monday, November 12, 2012

Not Facing Reality: GOP House wants Romney Tax Plan Passed in Line with Norquist Tax Pledge

There is hope as a good portion of the American voters have woken up to Grover Norquist and his ridiculous 'no tax' pledge or he will primary you.  The Republican Party has given Norquist way too much credit to their own detriment with his pledge.  Very few backbones exist in the Republican Party today who are willing to stand up to Norquist.  Looks like the American voters understand very well based on the results that the no tax pledge is hurting our economy and are willing to see the 2% of the wealthiest people pay more in taxes and close the Bush Tax Cut loopholes for the wealthy.  Shame the Republican House Members do not understand what the voters were saying on November 6th.  They still seem to have their heads buried in the sand from their comments.

Without the redistricting and the gerrymandering by Republicans, the Democrats would have taken the House based on the analysis of the popular vote.  Imagine that -- Republicans doing the same thing they accused Democrats of doing (which they did).  Put the two parties at the state level in a sack on redistricting, shake them up, and whoever won the legislature in the state will be doing gerrymandering to get more House seats and keep the other side from winning more.  Neither side is looking out for constituents but their own personal gain IMHO.  The best news was the fact that the Norquist anti-tax pledge took a big hit:
Setting aside alleged scatological name-calling (by Grover Norquist), the election was an overwhelming rejection of the the political philosophy advocated by Norquist and his allies. 24 Republican Senate incumbents and candidates signed Norquist’s anti-tax pledge and lost. Linda McMahon (R-CT), Senator Scott Brown (R-MA), Treasurer Josh Mandel (R-OH), Secretary of State Charles Summers (R-ME), former Gov. Tommy Thompson (R-WI), considered top-tier candidates, were attacked by their Democrats opponents in face-to-face debates for signing Norquist’s pledge. They all lost.

55 Republican House incumbents or candidates who signed Norquist’s pledge also lost.
When I was first told that House Republicans want the Romney Tax Plan to be implemented, I laughed because I thought it was a joke.  I was wrong -- GOP House is advocating passing the Romney Tax Plan whatever that is as we never did get the details.  Are they too stubborn or dumb to understand that President Obama got over $3M more votes then Romney and votes are still being counted?  That means President Obama gets to set the agenda.

Just because the GOP swallowed the Fox News, Rove, Morris, and other conservative pundits/pollsters koolaid, doesn't change the fact that Romney never came close with Obama getting 332 electoral votes to Romney's 206.  What am I missing?  Arrogance and stubbornness of the GOP House?  They cannot be that naive to think that Obama is just going to sit back and let them tell him what to do.  Sources are saying that  Obama is about to take his case to the American people.  If the GOP wants to lose the House in 2014, all they need to do is keep it up with their obstructionist tactics. 
Congressional Republicans’ ‘Compromise’: Everyone Should Accept Romney Tax PlanBy Josh Israel posted from ThinkProgress Economy on Nov 11, 2012 at 1:25 pm
Seemingly ignoring that over than 3 million more Americans voted for President Obama than Mitt Romney on Tuesday, Congressional Republicans are moving quickly to embrace Speaker John Boehner’s (R-OH) call to adopt a tax “compromise” that is virtually identical to the tax proposal that Romney made the centerpiece of his failed campaign. 
The running theme this week is what Senator Chuck Schumer (D-NY) called the “Rumpelstiltskin fairy tale” that the country can increase revenues simply by lowering tax rates:
Sen. Saxby Chambliss (R-GA): On ABC’s This Week, Chambliss said, “Bowles-Simpson said, look, eliminate all these tax credits and tax deductions. You can generate somewhere 1 to 1.2 trillion in additional revenue. You can actually lower tax rates by doing that. And I think at the end of the day, what’s got to happen, George, we’ve got to get this economy going again.
Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK): In a Friday column, House Budget Committee member Cole wrote: “However, raising tax rates is not the only way to increase revenue, nor is it the best way. Speaker Boehner has proposed comprehensive tax reform to raise revenue and lower rates. Eliminating inefficient loopholes and deductions will generate economic growth while creating a simpler, fairer tax code.
Rep. Kevin Brady (R-TX): In a Wednesday Tweet, House Ways and Means Committee member Brady opined: “Stronger economic growth from tax reform that lowers rates and closes loopholes will generate higher revenue to bring the deficit down.
Rep. Eric Cantor (R-VA): In a letter to his Republican caucus, the House Majority Leader wrote: “What would be best is a fundamental reform of the tax code that lowers rates, broadens the base, makes America’s businesses competitive again, and reduces the burden imposed by taxes on work and investment.”
Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI): In a Wednesday press release, the House Ways and Means Chairman wrote: “There is a better path forward than simply increasing tax rates, and one in which both sides can claim victory. We can address both our jobs crisis and our debt crisis by focusing on tax reform that strengthens the economy. There is bipartisan support for tax reform that closes loopholes and lowers rates.”
Rep. Tom Price (R-GA): On Fox News Sunday, House Republican Policy Committee Chairman Price, a member of both the Ways and Means and Budget Committees, said “We can increase revenue without increasing the tax rates on anybody in this country.”
The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office says there will be no significant negative impact on the economy should the lower rates on the wealthiest Americans be allowed to expire. And the notion that lowering rates will magically create more revenue is indeed a right-wing pipe dream.
Then there are the comments of Cong Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA) who doesn't think the GOP has to move back to center right from the hard right.  All they have to do is modernize the message?  She has to be kidding.  Take a look at the picture from Talking Points Member with the four female Congresswomen behind her.  Don't know about other's take, but those four women do not look very happy to me:




Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-WA), the highest ranked House Republican woman, said Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union" that Republicans need to become more "modern" but not "moderate." 
"I don't think it's about the Republican Party needing to become more moderate; I really believe it's the Republican Party becoming more modern," she said. "And whether it's Hispanics, whether it's women, whether it's young people, the Republican Party has to make it a priority to take our values, to take our vision to every corner of this country." 
"I think it's more about the messenger and who's communicating our values to every corner of this country."
Does this mean that center right in today's vocabulary means 'moderate' to those on the hard right?  The Republican Party cannot win by staying hard right no matter the message.  Voters will see right through the hard right candidates as they did this time.  Using social issues hurt Republican candidates big time but the GOP seems poised to come right back and only redo how the message is delivered.  Keeping social issues front and center along with obstructing anything the President proposes and saying the President needs to adopt the Romney Tax Cuts is a sure prescription for disaster in 2014.

We need at least two viable parties and right now we have the Democrat Party and lack a true Republican Party as the Party went hard right in 2012.  The Republican Party today follows the lead of Rush and the conservative pundits along with Fox News which is a total prescription for disaster.  Don't know how many times that MSNBC would play a Rush clip of the afternoon, then Fox Tabloid News would pick it up, and the next day Romney/Ryan or Sununu would be touting what was said by pundits.  Shook my head more than once during this election cycle.  No wonder the Republicans including Romney, Gingrich, Rove, Morris, and Fox Tabloid News were shocked that Obama won handily since they are relied on a false premise that Romney was winning when he wasn't.  You cannot run a campaign in a bubble of only news you want to hear or you are going to lose which is exactly what happened to Romney/Ryan.

Did the GOP learn their lesson.  Jury is out but initial comments are saying NO!  Hope I am wrong, and the Party moves back to center right but I sure wouldn't want to take that bet. 

Thursday, September 6, 2012

Republicans Plot Night of Pres Obama's Inauguration to Plot Making Him a One-Term President

Did they also cut a deal to make Romney the next candidate because of his money and donor ties?  They needed the money for 2010 so was Romney was the conduit?  How many Republicans have they lost who refuse to vote for Romney/Ryan over their shenanigans?  Betting the number is going up by the day with all the lies coming out of Republicans each and every day.

Last night when I heard Former President Bill Clinton talk about a meeting the night of the Inauguration of President Obama, I was shocked and decided this morning to find out what this was all about.  Remember these names of the people who had the audacity to meet on the night of President Obama's Inauguration to lay down the plans to make him a one-term President.  These people had no intention of working with the new President or for the American people:
According to Draper, the guest list that night (which was just over 15 people in total) included Republican Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.), along with Republican Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.). The non-lawmakers present included Newt Gingrich, several years removed from his presidential campaign, and Frank Luntz, the long-time Republican wordsmith. Notably absent were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) -- who, Draper writes, had an acrimonious relationship with Luntz. 
I can guarantee you that as a Republican for over 40 years, I would have quit the Republican Party in 2009 if I knew about this.  Instead I helped elect some of the worst candidates ever in other states in 2010 and swallowed the koolaid on the Ryan budget since his wife was from Oklahoma -- he seemed like a stand-up guy.  He was not a stand-up guy but someone from the far right that I used to get in arguments with on Free Republic as an active poster under the name "PhiKapMom."

In 2007, it came out in a Washington paper that I was part of the purge on Free Republic because I wasn't posting but I was in FL for my granddaughter's birthday and then going to Chicago for a visit with my new grandson.  Now that I look back with what I know now, it is beginning to make sense.  The purge showed how more common sense conservatives were already being destroyed by the far right.  Learned when I got back about the purge and the new websites that had formed.  Didn't understand it then, but do today -- the leadership of the Republican Party did not want voices of reason speaking out on websites.  Do I believe they sent out their minions to do the job?  Absolutely!

I was not part of the purge but never felt the same about a site that I had trusted for years and it culminated in my not posting much after 2008 since I had supported Rudy and didn't feel welcome so they might as well have purged me.  I would support Rudy all over again because he had some very good ideas and could care less about the social issues.  The 'my way or no way' crowd finally made me stop and realize they were too far right for me.  I don't remember the last time I even read the site but I am sure their posters would agree with this article from April which I missed because of being gone.

Cannot even tell you the contempt I have for this group since I helped get some of them elected.  Was told several years ago that Senator Jim Inhofe was one of the few honest people in the Congress -- like him or detest him -- he says what he thinks.  Knew something was wrong earlier this summer when he was talking about working with Senator Barbara Boxer on the Transportation bill to bring jobs to states and start to fix the infrastructure and had some harsh words for House Republicans.  I never thought I would see him working with Boxer or her with him.  Both put their partisanship aside for the good of Americans -- what a novel idea in this partisan Congress.  (sarcasm)

Senators Inhofe (R-OK) and Boxer (D-CA) along with Cong Lankford (R-OK) and other House members from both parties of the House Transportation Committee worked to get the bill passed in the House where the bill was being stalled.  The House was failing to act on the Transportation Bill that would bring jobs and help fix our infrastructure.  Can remember the frustration here in Oklahoma from these two members of Congress at how slow this bill was progressing when it should have been a slam dunk.   Finally on 28 June the House got a clue they had better act on the Transportation bill to help America by passing the bill with 55 Republicans and 108 Democrats in the House voting against the bill which was signed into law by the President the end of June.  With all the road construction going on in the states, would say between the stimulus and this House bill anyone who wants a job in road construction can find one.

Senators Inhofe and Boxer showed what can happen when you do put political partisanship aside and work for the good of all Americans.  Shame more members of Congress don't share their willingness to work together across the aisle putting partisan gamesmanship aside for the good of the American people. This article from April gives the reasons why this has become an obstructionist Congress:
Robert Draper Book: GOP's Anti-Obama Campaign Started Night Of Inauguration Posted: Updated: 04/26/2012 10:09 am 
WASHINGTON -- As President Barack Obama was celebrating his inauguration at various balls, top Republican lawmakers and strategists were conjuring up ways to submarine his presidency at a private dinner in Washington. 
The event -- which provides a telling revelation for how quickly the post-election climate soured -- serves as the prologue of Robert Draper's much-discussed and heavily-reported new book, "Do Not Ask What Good We Do: Inside the U.S. House of Representatives." 
According to Draper, the guest list that night (which was just over 15 people in total) included Republican Reps. Eric Cantor (Va.), Kevin McCarthy (Calif.), Paul Ryan (Wis.), Pete Sessions (Texas), Jeb Hensarling (Texas), Pete Hoekstra (Mich.) and Dan Lungren (Calif.), along with Republican Sens. Jim DeMint (S.C.), Jon Kyl (Ariz.), Tom Coburn (Okla.), John Ensign (Nev.) and Bob Corker (Tenn.). The non-lawmakers present included Newt Gingrich, several years removed from his presidential campaign, and Frank Luntz, the long-time Republican wordsmith. Notably absent were Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) and House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) -- who, Draper writes, had an acrimonious relationship with Luntz. 
For several hours in the Caucus Room (a high-end D.C. establishment), the book says they plotted out ways to not just win back political power, but to also put the brakes on Obama's legislative platform. 
"If you act like you're the minority, you're going to stay in the minority," Draper quotes McCarthy as saying. "We've gotta challenge them on every single bill and challenge them on every single campaign." 
The conversation got only more specific from there, Draper reports. Kyl suggested going after incoming Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner for failing to pay Social Security and Medicare taxes while at the International Monetary Fund. Gingrich noted that House Ways and Means Chairman Charlie Rangel (D-N.Y.) had a similar tax problem. McCarthy chimed in to declare "there's a web" before arguing that Republicans could put pressure on any Democrat who accepted campaign money from Rangel to give it back. 
The dinner lasted nearly four hours. They parted company almost giddily. The Republicans had agreed on a way forward: 
Go after Geithner. (And indeed Kyl did, the next day: ‘Would you answer my question rather than dancing around it—please?’) 
Show united and unyielding opposition to the president’s economic policies. (Eight days later, Minority Whip Cantor would hold the House Republicans to a unanimous No against Obama’s economic stimulus plan.) 
Begin attacking vulnerable Democrats on the airwaves. (The first National Republican Congressional Committee attack ads would run in less than two months.) 
Win the spear point of the House in 2010. Jab Obama relentlessly in 2011. Win the White House and the Senate in 2012. 
"You will remember this day," Draper reports Newt Gingrich as saying on the way out. "You’ll remember this as the day the seeds of 2012 were sown." 
Draper's timeline is correct. On Jan. 21, 2009, Kyl aggressively questioned Geithner during his confirmation hearings. On Jan. 28, 2009, House GOP leadership held the line against the stimulus package (Senate GOP leadership would prove less successful in stopping defections).
The votes, of course, can be attributed to legitimate philosophical objection to the idea of stimulus spending as well as sincere concern that the secretary of the Treasury should personally have a clean tax-paying record. But what Draper's book makes clear is that blunt electoral-minded ambitions were the animating force.
Whether or not that's shocking depends on the degree to which one's view of politics has been jaded. What's certainly noteworthy is the timing. When Mitch McConnell said in October 2010 that his party's primary goal in the next Congress was to make Obama a one-term president, it was treated as remarkably candid and deeply cynical. Had he said it publicly in January 2009, it would likely have caused an uproar.  
By extension, however, the Draper anecdote also negatively reflects on the Obama administration for failing to appreciate how quickly congressional Republicans would oppose the president's agenda. 
Source:  Sam Stein, Huffington Post
The nerve of these Republican members of Congress to meet on the night of President Obama's Inauguration to plot on how to make him a one term President is shocking not to mention disgusting.  What has happened to today's members of the Republican Party who will put politics and the Party ahead of what is good for America?  Their stalling tactics are causing the recession to last longer then it should.  Hope they are very proud of themselves for what they have done to this Country.  If anyone has any doubts about why many of us are refusing to support Republicans in 2012, read the above story and see just how dishonest the leadership of the Republican Party has become.

Thanks to Clinton, I went back and dug up this story to showcase just how the obstruction in the House and Senate was planned from Day One.  No wonder Olympia Snowe is not running for reelection as she was known for working across the aisle for all Americans.  The hostile takeover of the Republican Party by the far right and Romney is making a lot of us stop and think about staying in a party that is so far right they have lost their moral compass on what is best for all Americans.

Their racist attacks on the President and others have not gone unnoticed.  The bigotry of the Republican Party today is on display for all to see as leaders made their comments and innuendos toward the President and then run out to apologize not understanding how anyone could think the comment was racist.  That is pure Bravo Sierra on the part of the Republican Party leadership and the conservative pundits like Rush who has gone so far over the top in this election only someone who wants to be a follower not a thinker could stand to listen to his rhetoric which now we learn was planned from Day One.

Think twice and then think again before voting for national Republicans in this election unless you know them personally because frankly this group in the House need to be defeated along with some Senators.  Hope in 2014 that Kentucky Republicans get a clue and retire Mitch McConnell for the use of the filibuster leading to a record number to stop bills that would have helped the economy.  Looks like this group of House and Senate leadership care more about the big donors then the middle class many of who are Republicans.

Is this all about keeping the tax cuts for the rich along with the loopholes so they can continue to take deductions for expenses for their offshore business adventures off their income tax but don't have to claim any income?  Waiting for the other shoe to drop on that one!

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

GOP seeks SEC records on Goldman

The Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) expects everyone to swallow the kool-aid that the charges against Goldman Sachs just happened to correspond when the Dodd Financial Bill is about to be announced. You could say it was a coincidence but that happens rarely in the Government or in politics.

Maybe it is time for Congress to investigate the SEC on how they handle their cases and what takes so long. If not for Cong Issa the Ranking Member of the Committee along with fellow Republicans, no Democrats would be questinioning what the SEC was doing which in itself is an indictment against the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee.

Why are the Democrats so against getting to the bottom of what actually happened? Is it because of the large donations they have been getting from the financial sector? We are against donations to members of Congress from any group they have oversight. It just makes sense not to take contributions from Banking if you are on the Banking Committee. It makes sense but will never happen as the current members of Congress want to continue incumbent protection. Goldman Sachs is an example of a company that played both sides of the aisle although donations of almost $1M to Obama is excessive by their employees.

We can only hope the head of the SEC is correct that this banking bill is not going to affect their investigations and we will be seeing more charges in the days ahead against companies in addition Goldman Sachs.

GOP seeks SEC records on Goldman

By MIKE ALLEN 4/20/10 2:25 PM EDT
Updated: 4/21/10 9:28 AM EDT

Rep. Darrell Issa has written a letter to the SEC demanding to know if the commission had any contact about the case, prior to its public release, with a variety of individuals.

Rep. Darrell Issa, the top Republican on the House Oversight committee, is demanding a slew of documents from the Securities and Exchange Commission, asserting that the timing of civil charges against Goldman Sachs raises “serious questions about the commission’s independence and impartiality.”

Issa’s letter, addressed to SEC Chairwoman Mary Schapiro and signed by eight other House Republicans, asks whether the commission had any contact about the case, prior to its public release, with White House aides, Democratic Party committee officials, or members of Congress or their staff.

“[W]e are concerned that politics have unduly influenced the decision and timing of the commission’s controversial enforcement action against Goldman,” Issa writes.
Issa implied that the timing was a bit too convenient, saying President Barack Obama’s push on Wall Street reform “neatly coincided with the commission’s announcement of the suit.”

SEC spokesman John Nester said: “We will respond as appropriate to the letter, but the Commission doesn't coordinate its enforcement actions with the White House, Congress, or political committees. Regulatory reform has been pending for the past year. We have brought many cases related to the financial crisis over that period and we will not let the reform debate deter us from bringing new ones.”

The letter is also signed by Republican Reps. Jim Jordan of Ohio, Jason Chaffetz of Utah, Patrick McHenry of North Carolina, Dan Burton of Indiana, John Mica of Florida, Blaine Luetkemeyer of Missouri, Aaron Schock of Illinois and Anh “Joseph” Cao of Louisiana.

Read more: Politico

Sunday, November 1, 2009

Speaker Pelosi Denies Public Access to Health Care Public Plan Announcement

This is from You Tube when Cong Eric Cantor,Republican Whip, tried to attend the Speaker Pelosi announcement of the House healthcare bill. Now Republicans are not even allowed at her events? Pelosi asked more like a dictator every day!

October 29, 2009

In a stunning development, Speaker Pelosi Denies Public Access to Health Care Public Plan Announcement.

Wednesday, September 9, 2009

Boehner: GOP leaders haven't met Obama for health talks since April (yet criticizes GOP for not being on board)

The Hill
09/09/09
Molly Hooper

The ball is in President Obama's court to reach out to Republicans if he wants a bipartisan bill on healthcare reform, House GOP Leader John Boehner (Ohio) said Monday morning.

Boehner told reporters that the president has not invited House GOP leaders to the White House for meetings on healthcare reform since the end of April.

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com

Comments: Obama doesn't listen to House Republican, doesn't listen to Blue Dog Democrats and most important does not listen to the American people who don't want a Government run health care plan. It is not just Republicans but Independents and Democrats by over 50% say NO to Obamacare. What part of that does Obama not understand. The American people didn't elect a dictator or did they elect someone who wants to act like a dictator.