Guess Ailes didn't want Pawlenty touting Romney when he already has Rove who pretends he is just a pundit when anyone with a brain knows he is out to tank Perry and will use whatever to ensure that Jeb Bush can run in 2016. It is not secret and has not been for sometime.
Three weeks after dropping out of the race, Tim Pawlenty showed up to ask for a gig at Fox. But there was a complication: Pawlenty was on the verge of endorsing Romney. “I’m not sure I want to sign you as a paid spokesman for Romney,” Ailes said.What do some conservatives think of Fox News now that Ailes wants to tank the Republican candidates? Who does it benefit? Obama of course and a continuation of soft money so the rich get richer and the middle class takes it on the chin once again. They want to be able to borrow tons of money at little to no cost.
Was told by several people that this debate was going to be a set-up and sure enough it was. This is one of the most disgusting things that Fox News has done today and heads should roll but we expect more of the same. Any conservative that watches Fox News needs to get a clue that Fox News is no friend of conservatives. Roger Ailes and the rest need FIRED! Better yet Fox News needs tanked and Murdoch fired!
Republican candidates should refuse to do any more debates until the RNC ensures that the debates are fair and square. Time for the RNC Chair Priebus to step forward and stand up for the Republican candidates against the likes of the Obama media including Fox News, Roger Ailes, and Rupert Mudoch.
Time to take the gloves off and say exactly how unethical Fox News has become in this election cycle including refusing to hire Pawlenty but keeping Rove on the air with Fox News along with Huckabee who trashes Republican candidates. Is the reason we are having so many Republican debates is to help Obama and tank Republicans? Sure looks like it!
Thanks to Howard Kurtz for the TRUTH which is something Fox News knows little about!
Roger’s Reality Show
Howard Kurtz
First, Ailes dialed back the Tea Party talk. Now he’s turning the GOP race into a political X-Factor—and steering the election agenda one more time.
It was part political spectacle, part American Idol, part YouTube extravaganza, a pure Roger Ailes production—and the latest sign that the Fox News chairman is quietly repositioning America’s dominant cable-news channel.
Hours before last week’s presidential debate in Orlando, Ailes’s anchors sat in a cavernous back room, hunched over laptops, and plotted how to trap the candidates. Chris Wallace said he would aim squarely at Rick Perry’s weakness: “How do you feel about being criticized by some of your rivals as being too soft on illegal immigration? Then I go to Rick Santorum: is Perry too soft?”
“That’s going to get some fireworks going,” said managing editor Bill Sammon, grinning.
When showtime arrived, producer Marty Ryan choreographed the action from a crowded trailer outside the convention hall: he called for a two-shot when Wallace invited Mitt Romney to criticize Perry’s immigration stance, so the audience could watch both men’s agitated expressions. But Ryan barked, “Let’s just be on Perry,” as the Texas governor demanded to know whether Santorum had ever been to the Mexican border, capturing the moment. Afterward, Ailes phoned a top lieutenant: “Tell the team we’ve been kicking ass in these debates.”
Ailes has always been a master showman—he even gave advice on triple-checking the audio—and Fox’s partnership with Google produced striking videos, graphics, and a backstage smoothie bar. But the real eye-opener was the sight of his anchors grilling the Republican contenders, which pleases the White House but cuts sharply against the network’s conservative image—and risks alienating its most rabid right-wing fans.
Excerpt: Read More at The Daily BeastI am not one to boycott but this time I can state that I will NEVER watch Fox News again and I was one of the people in my community to beg to get them on the air. I was 100% wrong and the local cable company person who said you cannot trust Murdoch or Ailes was correct. Should have listened back then.
No comments:
Post a Comment