Now we have a Former State Senator, Burt Cohen, from NH who is running for the US Senate seat of Republican Judd Gregg, comparing protestors against OBAMACARE to the early days of Nazi's (see below). What an affront to everyone that that opposes OBAMACARE that does not want this Socialist health care plan of Obama's. What we have looks to be SOCIALISM is GREAT and any one opposing this takeover of the Health Care system is a NAZI? What sick mind came up with that?
SHAME on State Senator Cohen -- send him to the Unemployment line in November 2010. NH voters need to remember their rallying cry: Live Free or Die!
Read this article and see for yourself what the Democrat attack machine is now using. Actually using the wrong words it should be The Chicago Thug machine that is on the attack by trying to demonize American citizens that oppose OBAMACARE. What happened to freedom of speech? Guess freedom of speech only mattered when the organized Democrat movement attacked President Bush endlessly. During the Clinton years where Rahm Emmuel was a player, the Clinton White House personnel sent out Talking Point memos for the day for Democrat lemmings to use to call Talk Radio so they were all on the same page.
The Chicago thugs in this Administration obviously have never known the Republican's Conservative grassroots movement which is made up of independent thinkers who do research before taking a stand. Democrats have the little lemmings that when their leaders say jump, they say how high? Speaker Pelosi is a great example of that analogy as she as cracked her whip against the Blue Dogs which saw Cong Gene Taylor's (D-MS) voting record go from conservative to liberal in one year after Pelosi took over. What is the White House using to get these Blue Dogs on board and now have a candidate like Cohen spout such nonsense? Most likely guess is that it came from a White House Talking Point paper they sent to candidates ushering back in the Clinton era of lemmings.
After reading the article below, ask yourself if this is the type of person you want in the United State Senate:
http://www.redhampshire.com/sen-cohen-compare-protesters-to-nazis/
August 4, 2009
Grant Bosse
Former Democratic State Senator and U.S. Senate candidate Burt Cohen thinks that protesting the Obama Administration’s fiscal and health care policies is akin to the early days of the Nazis, and he’s not the only one.
In the expected and tired thread accusing Tea Party protesters of being tools of corporate interests rather than citizens fed up with big government, the seacoast Democrat compares the wave of protests greeting members of Congress during their August recess to Hitler’s rise to power in 1930’s Germany.
We’ve seen this show before
In the economic difficulties on the 1930s, corporate interests successfully manipulated fear and populist tendencies to intentionally disrupt politics and whip up nationalistic violence.
In Germany.
No’m Sayn?
And he’s not the only one comparing protesters to “Brown Shirts in the early Nazi days”.
Such hateful and disgusting comments are not new from the radical left, but are no less vile. The Nazi comparisons are merely the harshest insults posted by Blue Hampshire commentators.
Blue Hampshire regulars also call protesters “clowns”, “buffons”, and of course “teabaggers”. The hatred and contempt is absolutely ridiculous. They see a big-government program going down in flames, and their best response is to call their opponents Nazis. Be sure to remember such tactics the next time Blue Hampshire speaks out against “hate speech”.
Tuesday, August 4, 2009
Monday, August 3, 2009
DCCC Send Out Fundraising Letters for OBAMACARE to REPUBLICAN ACTIVISTS
Thought you would enjoy reading what the DCCC (Congressional Committee) is doing -- pretty stupid to send it to a Repubican Activist in Oklahoma where Obama only received 34% of the vote and didn't win one County. Thanks for sharing the email with the rest of us on what the DCCC is doing -- asking Republicans for donations or should I say Bill Clinton is asking Republicans for donations for OBAMACARE is ludicrous. But it sure gave me a laugh when I read it today. All I could think of is how dumb is that. Asking anyone in Oklahoma to donate to any Obama is kind of dumb but asking Oklahoma Republicans to donate is even dumber.
We defeated HILLARYCARE in 1993 and the American people will do it again in 2009 despite the threats of Sen Reid to play lose with the Rules of the Senate. Time to send Reid, Pelosi and anyone who votes for Obamacare to the Unemployment line in 2009!
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
How did you get my email and my name? Who sold you the list?
I am a lifelong Republican who has NEVER supported National Democrats or where they stand on issues. I find this disgusting that you are sending out emails at will to Republicans.
I will tell you what I think of the Obamacare plan -- it stinks and is an affront to the American people who pay taxes since you want us to fund abortions, illegal's healthcare, and withhold care for senior citizens with our tax dollars. No Thanks to Obamacare.
This is one Republican who will work tirelessly to see the House and Senate Democrats lose seats for supporting this 1,000+ page Healthcare bill that Cong Conyers (D-MI) said was a waste of time to read unless you had two lawyers and time. That is the healthcare bill you have the audacity to want us to support but not read. Bet none of you have read what is in the bill because Democrats traditionally like to pass bills that no one has read since taking back over the House. You forget a very simple fact -- we work to elect office holders but when you take office you work for us, the taxpayer and voter.
Having a group appointed by this Democrat Administration to decide if someone lives or dies or meets their criteria for continued life is frightening. Who gave the Democrats the right to judge on who should live or die or who should get treatment and who should not? No one has that authority. It is up to the doctor to prescribe treatment and to God not some board.
Democrats wrote this monstrosity of bill without input from Republicans in the House, but now you have the nerve to send it to Republican voters and ask for our help? The arrogance by the Speaker and Democrats knows no bounds when they want their way. The Speaker runs a dictatorship in the House as evidence by the ACU voting records for Blue Dogs for 2007/2008. In 2007 before she cracked her whip, there were some actual conservative Blue Dogs but in 2008, their votes on Conservative issues tanked. Now they could never be called conservative with their voting record for 2008.
Right now in Oregon a woman with Cancer has been denied chemotherapy by the State Healthcare fund because simply put it wouldn't do any good and be a waste of money. Another Democrat state that healthcare is determined by the state and you want to do this nationally?
We have something called Oklahoma Values which is obviously foreign to the DCCC. We value and respect human life at all stages. We believe that taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund abortions or end life.
Not only Republicans are mad about this overreach on healthcare but some Democrats here in Oklahoma are just as mad. To send an email to anyone except the Governor and the State elected Democrats has to be a joke when our State only voted 34% for Obama including every county going for McCain. This email from you along with my comments is going nationwide. A copy of this email has been sent to Channel 9 news in Oklahoma City as well.
xxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx, OK
In a message dated 8/3/2009 9:51:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, dccc@dccc.org writes:
xxxxxx --
It seems like the 1993 health care debate all over again. Back then, I led the charge for comprehensive health insurance reform. I fought tooth and nail to get it done, keenly aware that millions of Americans were living in fear that a serious illness or injury could spell economic disaster for their families. Americans needed health care reform then and we urgently need it now.
But, just as I did in 1993, President Obama has run into a buzz saw of special interest opposition to his top domestic policy priority -- health care reform. He is facing off against some of the most powerful special interests in Washington who've launched a furious campaign to preserve the status quo.
Simply put, they're at it again. That's why I'm calling on you to stand with President Obama and the DCCC in fighting for change right now. The DCCC is united in their Health Care Reform Now campaign and is trying to raise $250,000 in grassroots donations before their deadline at midnight tonight.
Contribute $5, $10, or more tonight before our deadline at MIDNIGHT and your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar.
Legislation that would lower health care costs for everyone, improve the quality of care, preserve choice and provide more coverage options for American families was introduced in the House last month - just as Speaker Pelosi promised.
But a U.S. health care system that makes quality care affordable for everyone is going to take a lot of hard work from all of us.
Your immediate response is essential because Republicans are waging a fierce assault on President Obama's health care initiative and on Democratic Members of Congress fighting to reform health care now.
Contribute $5, $10, or more tonight before our deadline at MIDNIGHT and your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar.
Republicans have made a political calculation that they'd rather attack Congressional Democrats with sound bites and misleading characterizations of the President's health care reform plan than work on behalf of the American people.
It's up to us to prevent the Republican Party and their special interest backers from doing whatever they can to prevent this historic opportunity to make quality health care affordable and accessible to all.
Please make your next contribution to the DCCC a generous one...and please be sure to give before midnight tonight.
Thank you,
Bill Clinton
P.S. Remember that any size contribution you can make to the DCCC will be matched dollar-for-dollar. So, if you are able, now is an ideal time to step up your support of President Obama's change agenda.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*A group of Democratic Members of the House of Representatives will match your donation today. For every dollar that you donate, these members will donate a dollar of their own.
If you are having trouble with any of the links, cut and paste the following into your browser:
http://www.dccc.org/1993again6
This message was emailed to: xxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this email list, please use the link below:
http://www.dccc.org/page/unsubscribe/
To make sure you always get our emails add dccc@dccc.org to your address book.
Find out more about adding us to your address book here.
Paid for by Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
430 South Capitol Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003
(202) 863-1500 - www.dccc.org
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee are not tax deductible.
We defeated HILLARYCARE in 1993 and the American people will do it again in 2009 despite the threats of Sen Reid to play lose with the Rules of the Senate. Time to send Reid, Pelosi and anyone who votes for Obamacare to the Unemployment line in 2009!
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
How did you get my email and my name? Who sold you the list?
I am a lifelong Republican who has NEVER supported National Democrats or where they stand on issues. I find this disgusting that you are sending out emails at will to Republicans.
I will tell you what I think of the Obamacare plan -- it stinks and is an affront to the American people who pay taxes since you want us to fund abortions, illegal's healthcare, and withhold care for senior citizens with our tax dollars. No Thanks to Obamacare.
This is one Republican who will work tirelessly to see the House and Senate Democrats lose seats for supporting this 1,000+ page Healthcare bill that Cong Conyers (D-MI) said was a waste of time to read unless you had two lawyers and time. That is the healthcare bill you have the audacity to want us to support but not read. Bet none of you have read what is in the bill because Democrats traditionally like to pass bills that no one has read since taking back over the House. You forget a very simple fact -- we work to elect office holders but when you take office you work for us, the taxpayer and voter.
Having a group appointed by this Democrat Administration to decide if someone lives or dies or meets their criteria for continued life is frightening. Who gave the Democrats the right to judge on who should live or die or who should get treatment and who should not? No one has that authority. It is up to the doctor to prescribe treatment and to God not some board.
Democrats wrote this monstrosity of bill without input from Republicans in the House, but now you have the nerve to send it to Republican voters and ask for our help? The arrogance by the Speaker and Democrats knows no bounds when they want their way. The Speaker runs a dictatorship in the House as evidence by the ACU voting records for Blue Dogs for 2007/2008. In 2007 before she cracked her whip, there were some actual conservative Blue Dogs but in 2008, their votes on Conservative issues tanked. Now they could never be called conservative with their voting record for 2008.
Right now in Oregon a woman with Cancer has been denied chemotherapy by the State Healthcare fund because simply put it wouldn't do any good and be a waste of money. Another Democrat state that healthcare is determined by the state and you want to do this nationally?
We have something called Oklahoma Values which is obviously foreign to the DCCC. We value and respect human life at all stages. We believe that taxpayer dollars should not be used to fund abortions or end life.
Not only Republicans are mad about this overreach on healthcare but some Democrats here in Oklahoma are just as mad. To send an email to anyone except the Governor and the State elected Democrats has to be a joke when our State only voted 34% for Obama including every county going for McCain. This email from you along with my comments is going nationwide. A copy of this email has been sent to Channel 9 news in Oklahoma City as well.
xxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxx, OK
In a message dated 8/3/2009 9:51:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time, dccc@dccc.org writes:
xxxxxx --
It seems like the 1993 health care debate all over again. Back then, I led the charge for comprehensive health insurance reform. I fought tooth and nail to get it done, keenly aware that millions of Americans were living in fear that a serious illness or injury could spell economic disaster for their families. Americans needed health care reform then and we urgently need it now.
But, just as I did in 1993, President Obama has run into a buzz saw of special interest opposition to his top domestic policy priority -- health care reform. He is facing off against some of the most powerful special interests in Washington who've launched a furious campaign to preserve the status quo.
Simply put, they're at it again. That's why I'm calling on you to stand with President Obama and the DCCC in fighting for change right now. The DCCC is united in their Health Care Reform Now campaign and is trying to raise $250,000 in grassroots donations before their deadline at midnight tonight.
Contribute $5, $10, or more tonight before our deadline at MIDNIGHT and your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar.
Legislation that would lower health care costs for everyone, improve the quality of care, preserve choice and provide more coverage options for American families was introduced in the House last month - just as Speaker Pelosi promised.
But a U.S. health care system that makes quality care affordable for everyone is going to take a lot of hard work from all of us.
Your immediate response is essential because Republicans are waging a fierce assault on President Obama's health care initiative and on Democratic Members of Congress fighting to reform health care now.
Contribute $5, $10, or more tonight before our deadline at MIDNIGHT and your gift will be matched dollar-for-dollar.
Republicans have made a political calculation that they'd rather attack Congressional Democrats with sound bites and misleading characterizations of the President's health care reform plan than work on behalf of the American people.
It's up to us to prevent the Republican Party and their special interest backers from doing whatever they can to prevent this historic opportunity to make quality health care affordable and accessible to all.
Please make your next contribution to the DCCC a generous one...and please be sure to give before midnight tonight.
Thank you,
Bill Clinton
P.S. Remember that any size contribution you can make to the DCCC will be matched dollar-for-dollar. So, if you are able, now is an ideal time to step up your support of President Obama's change agenda.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*A group of Democratic Members of the House of Representatives will match your donation today. For every dollar that you donate, these members will donate a dollar of their own.
If you are having trouble with any of the links, cut and paste the following into your browser:
http://www.dccc.org/1993again6
This message was emailed to: xxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this email list, please use the link below:
http://www.dccc.org/page/unsubscribe/
To make sure you always get our emails add dccc@dccc.org to your address book.
Find out more about adding us to your address book here.
Paid for by Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.
430 South Capitol Street, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20003
(202) 863-1500 - www.dccc.org
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee.
Contributions or gifts to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee are not tax deductible.
SHOCK UNCOVERED: Obama in his OWN Words
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk
Obama IN HIS OWN WORDS saying His Health Care Plan will ELIMINATE private insurance. Is he lying now or was he lying when he made this statement. My money is on that he is lying now because a SINGLE PAYER HEALTH PLAN is exactly what this President wants so the Federal Government can control a large portion of our economy.
They cannot keep Medicare solvent but they want to take over the whole Healthcare business despite what the American citizens have to say. Why not tell Congress to join their proposed Obamacare and leave the Federal Employees Health system where Federal Employees are paying for Congress to get the highest care.
NORTH CAROLINIANS VISIT CONG HEATH SCHULER'S OFFICE
Time for everyone to visit their Congressman/Senator when they are back in the District/State in August on recess and tell them JUST SAY NO to OBAMACARE. Sure hope you get a better reception then what the North Carolinians found at Cong Schuler's Office (D-NC). Seems the Blue Dog Democrats have sold out to Pelosi. See the video below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxoa6IJzPn8
Obama IN HIS OWN WORDS saying His Health Care Plan will ELIMINATE private insurance. Is he lying now or was he lying when he made this statement. My money is on that he is lying now because a SINGLE PAYER HEALTH PLAN is exactly what this President wants so the Federal Government can control a large portion of our economy.
They cannot keep Medicare solvent but they want to take over the whole Healthcare business despite what the American citizens have to say. Why not tell Congress to join their proposed Obamacare and leave the Federal Employees Health system where Federal Employees are paying for Congress to get the highest care.
NORTH CAROLINIANS VISIT CONG HEATH SCHULER'S OFFICE
Time for everyone to visit their Congressman/Senator when they are back in the District/State in August on recess and tell them JUST SAY NO to OBAMACARE. Sure hope you get a better reception then what the North Carolinians found at Cong Schuler's Office (D-NC). Seems the Blue Dog Democrats have sold out to Pelosi. See the video below:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lxoa6IJzPn8
Saturday, August 1, 2009
WHERE ARE THE JOBS?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aTCGgYZZzA
WHERE ARE THE JOBS? That is an excellent question but pretty hard to answer by this President who used the words HOPE AND CHANGE and convinced over half the voters to vote for him because of a slogan when he had no experience in governing or holding a real job but plenty of experience voting PRESENT. Seems he is still voting PRESENT with words not action. One thing he does well is spend taxpayer dollars on his pet projects and CZARS.
Ask your Democrat Senator/Congressman during the August recess what happened to all the jobs that Obama promised and see what they have to say. Probably more of the AH, AH, AH from the Democrats when they don't have an answer.
WHERE ARE THE JOBS? That is an excellent question but pretty hard to answer by this President who used the words HOPE AND CHANGE and convinced over half the voters to vote for him because of a slogan when he had no experience in governing or holding a real job but plenty of experience voting PRESENT. Seems he is still voting PRESENT with words not action. One thing he does well is spend taxpayer dollars on his pet projects and CZARS.
Ask your Democrat Senator/Congressman during the August recess what happened to all the jobs that Obama promised and see what they have to say. Probably more of the AH, AH, AH from the Democrats when they don't have an answer.
MAXINE WATERS SPILLS THE BEANS -- OUTS THE DEMS SOCIALIST AGENDA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OrA9zj94NuU
This is a must see You Tube video from a segment of Fox News. This should be mandatory viewing for any American opposing socialism. For the first time in 30 years, Cong Maxine Waters outed the Progressive (Liberal) socialist agenda on a potential oil and gas takeover by the Federal Government. All she could say after her mistake was to copy Obama with UH, UH, UH -- must be catching in the Democrat Party.
This is a must see You Tube video from a segment of Fox News. This should be mandatory viewing for any American opposing socialism. For the first time in 30 years, Cong Maxine Waters outed the Progressive (Liberal) socialist agenda on a potential oil and gas takeover by the Federal Government. All she could say after her mistake was to copy Obama with UH, UH, UH -- must be catching in the Democrat Party.
Class versus Arrogance aka Bush versus Obama
The two pictures above tell you all you need to know about this President and his lack of compassion and class along with being very arrogant.
We have the one picture above of President Bush helping Senator Byrd down the steps with Sen Reid also helping. The other picture shows us Sgt Crowley helping Professor Gates down the steps. How ironic that Sgt Crowley, who Gates had verbally attacked before and after his arrest, was the one to help him down the steps while the President who talked about the police force of Cambridge being stupid without knowing the facts walked ahead of his 'so called' friend, Professor Gates, and Sgt Crowley. By the look on Obama's face, he didn't give one thought to Gates having trouble with the stairs.
Sgt Crowley through this whole ordeal has acted with absolute class and is a credit to the Cambridge Police force and police officers across America. The comments by President Obama were disgraceful but probably what we should expect from someone who spent 20 years in the racist church of Rev Wright and his hate whitey sermons which Obama obviously agreed with or he would not have stayed a member of that Church. Americans are finally waking up and seeing the true Barrack Obama that was hidden by the media throughout the campaign as they swallowed every word that they were told. Racists come in all colors and are all despicable.
Some Democrats had a lot to say about President Bush but he had a huge heart and compassion for people and would never would have walked in front of someone who had trouble walking down steps.
Judge for yourself which President cares about people and which one only cares about himself and acts like a wannabe King not a President. Pictures don't lie especially when both are released by the White House.
Blue Dog Democrats are NOT Conservative No Matter what the Media Calls Them
Recently the MSM has been calling Blue Dog Democrats Conservative so this inquiring mind decided to check out voting records of some of the Blue Dogs. They are anything but conservative when using the ACU voting records. Cong Ralph Hall, R-TX, had this to say:
He (Hall) reminded them that he had served for nearly a quarter century in the House as a Democrat before switching parties in 2004, so he knows the mindset on the other side of the aisle. He warned fellow Republicans not to pay too much attention to the opposition to radical health care reform from moderate Blue Dog Democrats. “In the end, Speaker Pelosi will break them,” he told his colleagues. She will use every tactic available, he said, to force wayward Democrats to vote for “her bill,” much as she did on cap-and-trade legislation. Another Republican who had often tangled with GOP House Speakers agreed, saying that Speaker Pelosi is “far more willful” than Newt Gingrich or Dennis Hastert were in their day. (Excerpt: Link to Wall Street Journal Article
Below you will find the voting records according to the ACU for the Blue Dogs (thanks to a Freeper for doing the work in finding these). One thing to note is the different in 2007 and 2008. Was 2008 when Speaker Pelosi really started cracking the whip on their votes? One to look at is Gene Taylor of MS who was Conservative in 2007 but liberal in 2008. That makes no sense except Pelosi was cracking her whip. Next question that any thinking person would ask was if they received campaign contributions in 2008 in exchange for votes which would mean their votes are for sale? There were rumors abounding that is how Pelosi got enough votes to pass Cap and Trade in the House. That will take some more research but the FEC will be a good place to start that research. Judge for yourself if the Blue Dogs are Conservative:
AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION RATINGS FOR
BLUE DOG DEMOCRATS - 2008, 2007 & LIFETIME
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BLUE DOG LEADERSHIP TEAM
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration [2008 (28) - 2007 (12) - Life (41.11)]
Rep. Baron Hill (IN-09), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Policy [2008 (20) - 2007 (20) - Life (24.50)]
Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Communications [2008 (12) - 2007 (36) - Life (26.22)]
Rep. Heath Shuler (NC-11), Blue Dog Whip [2008 (24) - 2007 (44) - Life (34:00)]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BLUE DOG MEMBERS
Altmire, Jason (PA-04) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (28) - Life (26.00)]
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (0)- Life (2.00)]
Baca, Joe (CA-43) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life - (16.44)]
Barrow, John (GA-12) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (24) - Life (41.00)]
Berry, Marion (AR-01) - [2008 (13) - 2007 (8) - Life (36.81)]
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (32.30)]
Boren, Dan (OK-02) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (57) - Life (54.25)]
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (8) - Life (27.52)]
Boyd, Allen (FL-02) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (12) - Life (35.53)]
Bright, Bobby (AL-02) - [ n/a ]
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (4) - Life (28.50)]
Carney, Christopher (PA-10) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (28) - Life (24.00)]
Chandler, Ben (KY-06) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (8) - Life (26.50)]
Childers, Travis (MS-01) - [2008 (41) - 2007 (n/a) - Life (41.00)]
Cooper, Jim (TN-05) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (16) - Life (24.17)]
Costa, Jim (CA-20) - [2008 (9) - 2007 (4) - Life (25.25)]
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (20) - Life (38.10)]
Dahlkemper, Kathy (PA-03)- [ n/a ]
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (38) - Life (52.54)]
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (44) - Life (36.00)]
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08) - [2008 (16) - 2007 (36) - Life (26.00)]
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (4) - Life (12.00)]
Gordon, Bart (TN-06) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (20) - Life (28.76)]
Griffith, Parker (AL-05) - [ n/a ]
Harman, Jane (CA-36) - [2008 (0) - 2007 (0) - Life (22.23)]
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie (SD) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (12) - Life (41.11)]
Hill, Baron (IN-09) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (20) - Life (24.50)]
Holden, Tim (PA-17) - [2008 (16) - 2007 (16) - Life (40:23)]
Kratovil, Jr., Frank (MD-01) - [ n/a ]
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07) - [2008 (32) - 2007 (44) - Life (51.50)]
Marshall, Jim (GA-03) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (61) - Life (47.14)]
Matheson, Jim (UT-02) - [2008 (36) - 2007 (36) - Life (42.75)]
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (36) - Life (46.22)]
Michaud, Mike (ME-02) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (0) - Life (16.00)]
Minnick, Walt (ID-01) - [ n/a ]
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05) - [2008 (32) - 2007 (8) - Life (20.00)]
Moore, Dennis (KS-03) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (17.10)]
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (4) - Life (8:00)]
Nye, Glenn (VA-02) - [ n/a ]
Peterson, Collin (MN-07) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (33) - Life (45.41)]
Pomeroy, Earl (ND) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (23.08)]
Ross, Mike (AR-04) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (28) - Life (38.00)]
Salazar, John (CO-03) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (8) - Life (27.00)]
Sanchez, Loretta (CA-47) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life (10.28)]
Schiff, Adam (CA-29) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (0) - Life (8.56)]
Scott, David (GA-13) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (23.92)]
Shuler, Heath (NC-11) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (44) - Life (34.00)]
Space, Zack (OH-18) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (20) - Life (16.00)]
Tanner, John (TN-08) - [2008 (13) - 2007 (21) - Life (41.49)]
Taylor, Gene (MS-04) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (72) - Life (66.11)]
Thompson, Mike (CA-01) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life (11.38)]
Wilson, Charles (OH-06) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (21) - Life (12.50)]
http://conservative.org/
He (Hall) reminded them that he had served for nearly a quarter century in the House as a Democrat before switching parties in 2004, so he knows the mindset on the other side of the aisle. He warned fellow Republicans not to pay too much attention to the opposition to radical health care reform from moderate Blue Dog Democrats. “In the end, Speaker Pelosi will break them,” he told his colleagues. She will use every tactic available, he said, to force wayward Democrats to vote for “her bill,” much as she did on cap-and-trade legislation. Another Republican who had often tangled with GOP House Speakers agreed, saying that Speaker Pelosi is “far more willful” than Newt Gingrich or Dennis Hastert were in their day. (Excerpt: Link to Wall Street Journal Article
Below you will find the voting records according to the ACU for the Blue Dogs (thanks to a Freeper for doing the work in finding these). One thing to note is the different in 2007 and 2008. Was 2008 when Speaker Pelosi really started cracking the whip on their votes? One to look at is Gene Taylor of MS who was Conservative in 2007 but liberal in 2008. That makes no sense except Pelosi was cracking her whip. Next question that any thinking person would ask was if they received campaign contributions in 2008 in exchange for votes which would mean their votes are for sale? There were rumors abounding that is how Pelosi got enough votes to pass Cap and Trade in the House. That will take some more research but the FEC will be a good place to start that research. Judge for yourself if the Blue Dogs are Conservative:
AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE UNION RATINGS FOR
BLUE DOG DEMOCRATS - 2008, 2007 & LIFETIME
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BLUE DOG LEADERSHIP TEAM
Rep. Stephanie Herseth Sandlin (SD), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Administration [2008 (28) - 2007 (12) - Life (41.11)]
Rep. Baron Hill (IN-09), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Policy [2008 (20) - 2007 (20) - Life (24.50)]
Rep. Charlie Melancon (LA-03), Blue Dog Co-Chair for Communications [2008 (12) - 2007 (36) - Life (26.22)]
Rep. Heath Shuler (NC-11), Blue Dog Whip [2008 (24) - 2007 (44) - Life (34:00)]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BLUE DOG MEMBERS
Altmire, Jason (PA-04) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (28) - Life (26.00)]
Arcuri, Mike (NY-24) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (0)- Life (2.00)]
Baca, Joe (CA-43) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life - (16.44)]
Barrow, John (GA-12) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (24) - Life (41.00)]
Berry, Marion (AR-01) - [2008 (13) - 2007 (8) - Life (36.81)]
Bishop, Sanford (GA-02) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (32.30)]
Boren, Dan (OK-02) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (57) - Life (54.25)]
Boswell, Leonard (IA-03) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (8) - Life (27.52)]
Boyd, Allen (FL-02) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (12) - Life (35.53)]
Bright, Bobby (AL-02) - [ n/a ]
Cardoza, Dennis (CA-18) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (4) - Life (28.50)]
Carney, Christopher (PA-10) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (28) - Life (24.00)]
Chandler, Ben (KY-06) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (8) - Life (26.50)]
Childers, Travis (MS-01) - [2008 (41) - 2007 (n/a) - Life (41.00)]
Cooper, Jim (TN-05) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (16) - Life (24.17)]
Costa, Jim (CA-20) - [2008 (9) - 2007 (4) - Life (25.25)]
Cuellar, Henry (TX-28) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (20) - Life (38.10)]
Dahlkemper, Kathy (PA-03)- [ n/a ]
Davis, Lincoln (TN-04) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (38) - Life (52.54)]
Donnelly, Joe (IN-02) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (44) - Life (36.00)]
Ellsworth, Brad (IN-08) - [2008 (16) - 2007 (36) - Life (26.00)]
Giffords, Gabrielle (AZ-08) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (4) - Life (12.00)]
Gordon, Bart (TN-06) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (20) - Life (28.76)]
Griffith, Parker (AL-05) - [ n/a ]
Harman, Jane (CA-36) - [2008 (0) - 2007 (0) - Life (22.23)]
Herseth Sandlin, Stephanie (SD) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (12) - Life (41.11)]
Hill, Baron (IN-09) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (20) - Life (24.50)]
Holden, Tim (PA-17) - [2008 (16) - 2007 (16) - Life (40:23)]
Kratovil, Jr., Frank (MD-01) - [ n/a ]
McIntyre, Mike (NC-07) - [2008 (32) - 2007 (44) - Life (51.50)]
Marshall, Jim (GA-03) - [2008 (28) - 2007 (61) - Life (47.14)]
Matheson, Jim (UT-02) - [2008 (36) - 2007 (36) - Life (42.75)]
Melancon, Charlie (LA-03) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (36) - Life (46.22)]
Michaud, Mike (ME-02) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (0) - Life (16.00)]
Minnick, Walt (ID-01) - [ n/a ]
Mitchell, Harry (AZ-05) - [2008 (32) - 2007 (8) - Life (20.00)]
Moore, Dennis (KS-03) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (17.10)]
Murphy, Patrick (PA-08) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (4) - Life (8:00)]
Nye, Glenn (VA-02) - [ n/a ]
Peterson, Collin (MN-07) - [2008 (20) - 2007 (33) - Life (45.41)]
Pomeroy, Earl (ND) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (23.08)]
Ross, Mike (AR-04) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (28) - Life (38.00)]
Salazar, John (CO-03) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (8) - Life (27.00)]
Sanchez, Loretta (CA-47) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life (10.28)]
Schiff, Adam (CA-29) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (0) - Life (8.56)]
Scott, David (GA-13) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (4) - Life (23.92)]
Shuler, Heath (NC-11) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (44) - Life (34.00)]
Space, Zack (OH-18) - [2008 (12) - 2007 (20) - Life (16.00)]
Tanner, John (TN-08) - [2008 (13) - 2007 (21) - Life (41.49)]
Taylor, Gene (MS-04) - [2008 (24) - 2007 (72) - Life (66.11)]
Thompson, Mike (CA-01) - [2008 (8) - 2007 (0) - Life (11.38)]
Wilson, Charles (OH-06) - [2008 (4) - 2007 (21) - Life (12.50)]
http://conservative.org/
Tuesday, June 30, 2009
TOP US Commander - Iran Still Supports Iraq Attacks
Note: The President invited Iranian diplomats to the 4th of July celebrations at our Embassies around the World, was very late in his remarks about the Government of Iran attacking protestors, and now we find out that Iran is still behind attacks in Iraq. Why does this President want to talk with this dictorial Iranian Government when our Commander on the ground believes they are behind the attacks in Baghdad?
Top US Commander - Iran Still Supports Iraq Attacks
The top U.S. military commander in Iraq says that Iran still supports and trains militants who carry out attacks _ mostly with mortars and sophisticated roadside bombs _ inside Iraq.
Gen. Ray Odierno says the attacks have been reduced but are still a problem.
He spoke on Tuesday at his base outside of Baghdad, as Iraqi forces took control of security in the Iraqi capital and other urban areas.
June 30 was the deadline for American troops to pull out of Iraqi cities under a U.S.-Iraqi security pact. The pullout was completed on Monday.
Odiero says Tehran is "still supporting, funding and training surrogates inside Iraq" and that he believes "many of the attacks in Baghdad are in fact done by individuals supported by Iran."
Top US Commander - Iran Still Supports Iraq Attacks
The top U.S. military commander in Iraq says that Iran still supports and trains militants who carry out attacks _ mostly with mortars and sophisticated roadside bombs _ inside Iraq.
Gen. Ray Odierno says the attacks have been reduced but are still a problem.
He spoke on Tuesday at his base outside of Baghdad, as Iraqi forces took control of security in the Iraqi capital and other urban areas.
June 30 was the deadline for American troops to pull out of Iraqi cities under a U.S.-Iraqi security pact. The pullout was completed on Monday.
Odiero says Tehran is "still supporting, funding and training surrogates inside Iraq" and that he believes "many of the attacks in Baghdad are in fact done by individuals supported by Iran."
Experts Warn of Growing Risks to US Nuclear Deterrent
The thought of Obama going to Moscow next week should have the vast majority of Americans concerned as to what he is going to offer since his Administration is so secretive. Below is a press release from the New Deterrent Working Group along with a link to Sen Kyl's article in the Wall Street Journal calling attention to what this Administration is doing with our nuclear arsenal. Do we need another START Treaty? NO WAY because it will harm not help the United States.
Why does this President want to take our nuclear weapons to the nub while other countries are building their arsenals including the Ruassians?
Why be in such a rush to deplete our nuclear arsenal is what freedom loving Americans want toi know?
New Deterrent Working Group Press Release:
For Immediate Release
30 June 2009
Contact: Lee Cohen (202) 835-9077
ON EVE OF OBAMA’S MOSCOW SUMMIT,
EXPERTS WARN OF GROWING RISKS TO U.S. NUCLEAR DETERRENT
(Washington, D.C.): As President Obama prepares to depart for Moscow next week, few Americans have any idea that his administration is in the process of negotiating a follow-on to the START treaty framework that appears likely to leave the United States and its allies substantially less secure.
Fortunately, an alarm about this prospect was published in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal by the U.S. Senate’s top authority on the subject, SEN. JON KYL (R-AZ) and veteran national security practitioner, RICHARD PERLE. And on Wednesday, 1 July, that warning will be strongly seconded and amplified by a team of experts on nuclear weapons policy and programs.
Toward this end, members of the NEW DETERRENT WORKING GROUP – an informal team with hundreds of man-years of experience with America’s nuclear forces, doctrine, operations and arms control that is sponsored by the Center for Security Policy – have prepared for Members of Congress, the Executive Branch, the press and the public at large a comprehensive Briefing Book entitled, U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Getting It Right. This publication, with a foreword by former Clinton CIA Director R. JAMES WOOLSEY, will be released at the National Press Club at 3:00 p.m. on 1 July 2009.
Getting it Right draws on a wealth of official documents, congressional testimony and other materials to demonstrate the abiding requirement in the 21st Century for an American nuclear deterrent that is reliable, credible, and effective – especially so in the face of present dangers and emerging threats to the United States and its allies. The Briefing Book provides, among other information: (1) assessments of the nuclear policies of America’s allies and peer competitors, as well as rogue nations that have acquired, or are on the verge of acquiring, a nuclear weapons capability; (2) a review of the declining quality and reliability of the U.S. nuclear arsenal and the infrastructure that supports it; and (3) a series of recommendations to ensure that both the quality and quantity of U.S. nuclear weapons remain at levels necessary to protect American national security and international stability.
In particular, the Briefing Book draws on recent and authoritative declarations made by those at the highest levels of the U.S. government with responsibility for assuring the viability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. These include: Secretary of Defense ROBERT GATES, U.S. Strategic Command Commander GEN. KEVIN P. CHILTON, National Nuclear Security Administration Administrator JAMES P. D'AGOSTINO as well as the director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory MICHAEL R. ANASTASIO. Getting it Right also excerpts and illuminates the most important findings and recommendations of such entities as the COMMISSION ON THE STRATEGIC POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES.
Members of the NEW DETERRENT WORKING GROUP who co-authored the Briefing Book include:
Hon. HENRY F. COOPER, Former Director of the Defense Strategic Initiative (SDI); Former U.S. Representative to the Defense and Space Talks;
Hon. PAULA DeSUTTER, Former Assistant Secretary of State – Bureau of Verification, Compliance and Implementation;
FRANK J. GAFFNEY, JR., Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (Acting);
Hon. PETER HUESSY, Former Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
Hon. SVEN F. KRAEMER, Former Director of Arms Control, National Security Council, 1981-1987;
Adm. JAMES "ACE” LYONS, JR., U.S. Navy (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet;
Vice Adm. ROBERT MONROE, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Former Director, Defense Nuclear Agency; Former Director of Navy Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E);
Dr. ROBERT L. PFALTZGRAFF, JR., Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of International Studies, The Fletcher School, Tufts University; President, Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis; and
Hon. TROY WADE, Former Director, Defense Programs, Department of Energy
Messrs. Huessy, Lyons, Monroe, and Gaffney will participate in a panel discussion of the highlights of Getting it RightMoscow and his administration’s national security and arms control agenda more generally. and take questions from the press about the ominous implications of the upcoming Obama summit in
In announcing Wednesday’s event, New Deterrent Working Group member Frank Gaffney said:
“President Obama – taking cues from the dangerously misguided “Global Zero” campaign he has embraced – is by all indications going to Moscow with the intent of drastically reducing the number of deployed U.S. nuclear weapons and making related concessions. To date, he appears to have failed to consider the potentially dire ramifications of such actions, let alone to have taken any steps to redress the woeful state of America’s nuclear arsenal or supporting infrastructure.
“At a time when so many actual or potential adversaries are improving their existing nuclear capabilities or acquiring such capabilities, the United States cannot afford to labor under the illusion that unilateral American disarmament and a lack of U.S. nuclear modernization will make the world safer, when it is clear that the opposite is true.”
To RSVP for the New Deterrent Working Group event or to receive a copy of U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Getting it Right, please contact Lee Cohen at (202) 835-9077, or at lcohen@securefreedom.org.
-30-
Why does this President want to take our nuclear weapons to the nub while other countries are building their arsenals including the Ruassians?
Why be in such a rush to deplete our nuclear arsenal is what freedom loving Americans want toi know?
New Deterrent Working Group Press Release:
For Immediate Release
30 June 2009
Contact: Lee Cohen (202) 835-9077
ON EVE OF OBAMA’S MOSCOW SUMMIT,
EXPERTS WARN OF GROWING RISKS TO U.S. NUCLEAR DETERRENT
(Washington, D.C.): As President Obama prepares to depart for Moscow next week, few Americans have any idea that his administration is in the process of negotiating a follow-on to the START treaty framework that appears likely to leave the United States and its allies substantially less secure.
Fortunately, an alarm about this prospect was published in yesterday’s Wall Street Journal by the U.S. Senate’s top authority on the subject, SEN. JON KYL (R-AZ) and veteran national security practitioner, RICHARD PERLE. And on Wednesday, 1 July, that warning will be strongly seconded and amplified by a team of experts on nuclear weapons policy and programs.
Toward this end, members of the NEW DETERRENT WORKING GROUP – an informal team with hundreds of man-years of experience with America’s nuclear forces, doctrine, operations and arms control that is sponsored by the Center for Security Policy – have prepared for Members of Congress, the Executive Branch, the press and the public at large a comprehensive Briefing Book entitled, U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Getting It Right. This publication, with a foreword by former Clinton CIA Director R. JAMES WOOLSEY, will be released at the National Press Club at 3:00 p.m. on 1 July 2009.
Getting it Right draws on a wealth of official documents, congressional testimony and other materials to demonstrate the abiding requirement in the 21st Century for an American nuclear deterrent that is reliable, credible, and effective – especially so in the face of present dangers and emerging threats to the United States and its allies. The Briefing Book provides, among other information: (1) assessments of the nuclear policies of America’s allies and peer competitors, as well as rogue nations that have acquired, or are on the verge of acquiring, a nuclear weapons capability; (2) a review of the declining quality and reliability of the U.S. nuclear arsenal and the infrastructure that supports it; and (3) a series of recommendations to ensure that both the quality and quantity of U.S. nuclear weapons remain at levels necessary to protect American national security and international stability.
In particular, the Briefing Book draws on recent and authoritative declarations made by those at the highest levels of the U.S. government with responsibility for assuring the viability of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. These include: Secretary of Defense ROBERT GATES, U.S. Strategic Command Commander GEN. KEVIN P. CHILTON, National Nuclear Security Administration Administrator JAMES P. D'AGOSTINO as well as the director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory MICHAEL R. ANASTASIO. Getting it Right also excerpts and illuminates the most important findings and recommendations of such entities as the COMMISSION ON THE STRATEGIC POSTURE OF THE UNITED STATES.
Members of the NEW DETERRENT WORKING GROUP who co-authored the Briefing Book include:
Hon. HENRY F. COOPER, Former Director of the Defense Strategic Initiative (SDI); Former U.S. Representative to the Defense and Space Talks;
Hon. PAULA DeSUTTER, Former Assistant Secretary of State – Bureau of Verification, Compliance and Implementation;
FRANK J. GAFFNEY, JR., Former Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy (Acting);
Hon. PETER HUESSY, Former Assistant Secretary of the Interior.
Hon. SVEN F. KRAEMER, Former Director of Arms Control, National Security Council, 1981-1987;
Adm. JAMES "ACE” LYONS, JR., U.S. Navy (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet;
Vice Adm. ROBERT MONROE, U.S. Navy (Ret.), Former Director, Defense Nuclear Agency; Former Director of Navy Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E);
Dr. ROBERT L. PFALTZGRAFF, JR., Shelby Cullom Davis Professor of International Studies, The Fletcher School, Tufts University; President, Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis; and
Hon. TROY WADE, Former Director, Defense Programs, Department of Energy
Messrs. Huessy, Lyons, Monroe, and Gaffney will participate in a panel discussion of the highlights of Getting it RightMoscow and his administration’s national security and arms control agenda more generally. and take questions from the press about the ominous implications of the upcoming Obama summit in
In announcing Wednesday’s event, New Deterrent Working Group member Frank Gaffney said:
“President Obama – taking cues from the dangerously misguided “Global Zero” campaign he has embraced – is by all indications going to Moscow with the intent of drastically reducing the number of deployed U.S. nuclear weapons and making related concessions. To date, he appears to have failed to consider the potentially dire ramifications of such actions, let alone to have taken any steps to redress the woeful state of America’s nuclear arsenal or supporting infrastructure.
“At a time when so many actual or potential adversaries are improving their existing nuclear capabilities or acquiring such capabilities, the United States cannot afford to labor under the illusion that unilateral American disarmament and a lack of U.S. nuclear modernization will make the world safer, when it is clear that the opposite is true.”
To RSVP for the New Deterrent Working Group event or to receive a copy of U.S. Nuclear Deterrence in the 21st Century: Getting it Right, please contact Lee Cohen at (202) 835-9077, or at lcohen@securefreedom.org.
-30-
We are Back!
We are back and gearing up for the 2010 elections. The last month has given the American people real insight into the Democrat controlled Congress and this Democrat President from who knows where.
One thing we do know is that he was never on the Mainland until he was 18 and started college in California. Where was he born? Toss a dart because he has spent over $1M, yes $1,000,000, to keep his birth certificate secret. He has had all his academic records sealed as well so we have no idea if he registered as an American student or as a foreign student as has been rumored. Was Frank Marshall Davis his mentor during his teen years and responsible for him going to Chicago? When did he meet Bill Ayers? Who were his friends in Chicago besides Ayers, Dohrn, Rev Wright, Rezko, Farrakhan? All kinds of questions that need answers, but where are the members of the mainstream media? MIA it seems.
Recently it has come out that there is proof that his first book, Dreams of My Father, was mostly ghost written by his good friend and confident, Bill Ayers. For details see Breakthrough on authorship by Jack Cashill who has spent countless hours researching to compare the book by Ayers with the book by Obama. The similarities are astounding and any thinking person will see that Ayers was the writer.
Why would Obama lie about that he wrote the book? Who wrote the second book is the new question? It was obvious from when he was elected the first black President of the Harvard Law Review that writing was not his strength as he didn't write anything of note so the chances of him writing not one but two books were slim to none. Law students vie for that position so they can get started early on their writings but not Obama. WHY? Who got him the position? Who got him into Law School? Why did Franklin Davis choose Chicago for him to land? Who got him to become a Community Organizer?
So many why's and so few answers about this man that was elected President thanks, in part, to a media that chose not to investigate his past and where he actually stood on issues preferring to give him a pass as so many of them became cheerleaders instead of reporters. He was their "Chosen One" which should have been the first clue they lost all objectivity.
Many members of the press obviously are not members of the Society of Professional Journalist (SPJ) because they certainly do not abide by the SPJ Code of Ethics. When the press becomes a cheerleader for a candidate instead of an unbiased reporter, it is time for them to find another line of work.
Recently, a White House Press Conference had the Administration plant a question with The Huffington Post Blog to ask - same Huffington Post Blog that said Pres George Bush was too cozy with the press which was laughable as they went after him with darts. How do the American people know now which questions from the WH Press Corps are legitimate and not planted by this WH press office at the request of Axelrod or Emmanual? Some of the most ridiculous softball questions have been asked of this President that it makes people with a brain want to throw up. What happened to the tough questions from our media?
If it wasn't for Major Garrett of Fox News and Jack Tapper of ABC News, very few hard questions would ever be asked. That doesn't even count the evening worshippers of this President at MSNBC. No way if you are a thinking person, would you watch MSNBC. Those shows give spin not news. Then we have Brian Williams almost bowing to the "leader" not to mention the infomercial of ABC on Obama healthcare.
This Nation was founded with Freedom of the Press in the Constitution but that doesn't mean Freedom to worship a President and hide facts from the American public. A Free Press is an independent Press not a Press that the White House Press Secretary can spin at will. Members of the Press need to get a reality check and realize their first job is not to listen to spin and report that spin from the White House Press Office, but to search out the truth and report.
Where is the media about this President's double standards when it comes to interfering in another country's business?
First he tells Israel they cannot build settlements which is none of his business. It is their land. The United States has always been a strong ally and supporter of Israel until this President took office. Fortunately, members of Congress still support Israel wholeheartedly.
Second, he doesn't want to get involved in Iran as Freedom Fighters demonstrate against the election fraud in Iran. Iranians are killed in peaceful demonstrations because they are against the current regime - shot in cold blood in some cases but our President plays golf on Father's Day (do as I say not as I do on Fathers Day) and eventually gets around to saying the Government shouldn't be doing that to their citizens. That said, he says Iranians are still welcome at our Embassies around the World to celebrate the 4th of July with eating hot dogs. What kind of diplomacy is that?
Now fast forward to this past weekend when the Hondurian Congress and then the Supreme Court gave the order to remove the current President who was going against their Constitution in declaring a referendum vote on Constitutional term limits so he could stay in power. He had no authority to call for referendum as that is not how they change their Constitution. The President who was ousted wanted Honduras to align closer to the Chavez and other Communist dictators and was moving the Country toward socialism and communism.
What does our "leader" do? We find out he has worked for several weeks to try and keep a Honduran President in power who was going against the Honduran Constitution. He is eventually removed by their Congress and Supreme Court who issues an order to the military to remove the current President. Obama strongly condemns Hondruas for their military coup when it was NO coup as the Congress and Supreme Court took the necessary steps before the Supreme Court gave the order to remove the President. Where was the fearless "leader" when this went down? He was playing golf like he did on Fathers Day after telling Fathers across America to stay home on Fathers Day.
The supposed "leader" of the free world, the American President, has sidedonce again sided with the Communist or Muslim dictators like Chavez, Noriega, and Castro. In the meantime he disses our allies Great Britain, France, Israel, Honduras, etc.
What does that tell the American people about this President? This "leader" is no friend to freedom loving people around the world. He doesn't even mouth the words freedom. His arrogance knows no bounds as he bows to the Saudi King. What American President would ever bow to a Saudi King? He cares more about the Muslim leaders then the leaders of our friends in NATO as evidenced by his looks at them when he meets with them. It has been dubbed the "Evil Eye" - judge for yourself.
In the days ahead we will take a closer look at his lack of foreign policy experience and how he is siding with Chavez, Castro, and Noriega against the legitimate government of Honduras who removed their President LEGALLY.
One thing we do know is that he was never on the Mainland until he was 18 and started college in California. Where was he born? Toss a dart because he has spent over $1M, yes $1,000,000, to keep his birth certificate secret. He has had all his academic records sealed as well so we have no idea if he registered as an American student or as a foreign student as has been rumored. Was Frank Marshall Davis his mentor during his teen years and responsible for him going to Chicago? When did he meet Bill Ayers? Who were his friends in Chicago besides Ayers, Dohrn, Rev Wright, Rezko, Farrakhan? All kinds of questions that need answers, but where are the members of the mainstream media? MIA it seems.
Recently it has come out that there is proof that his first book, Dreams of My Father, was mostly ghost written by his good friend and confident, Bill Ayers. For details see Breakthrough on authorship by Jack Cashill who has spent countless hours researching to compare the book by Ayers with the book by Obama. The similarities are astounding and any thinking person will see that Ayers was the writer.
Why would Obama lie about that he wrote the book? Who wrote the second book is the new question? It was obvious from when he was elected the first black President of the Harvard Law Review that writing was not his strength as he didn't write anything of note so the chances of him writing not one but two books were slim to none. Law students vie for that position so they can get started early on their writings but not Obama. WHY? Who got him the position? Who got him into Law School? Why did Franklin Davis choose Chicago for him to land? Who got him to become a Community Organizer?
So many why's and so few answers about this man that was elected President thanks, in part, to a media that chose not to investigate his past and where he actually stood on issues preferring to give him a pass as so many of them became cheerleaders instead of reporters. He was their "Chosen One" which should have been the first clue they lost all objectivity.
Many members of the press obviously are not members of the Society of Professional Journalist (SPJ) because they certainly do not abide by the SPJ Code of Ethics. When the press becomes a cheerleader for a candidate instead of an unbiased reporter, it is time for them to find another line of work.
Recently, a White House Press Conference had the Administration plant a question with The Huffington Post Blog to ask - same Huffington Post Blog that said Pres George Bush was too cozy with the press which was laughable as they went after him with darts. How do the American people know now which questions from the WH Press Corps are legitimate and not planted by this WH press office at the request of Axelrod or Emmanual? Some of the most ridiculous softball questions have been asked of this President that it makes people with a brain want to throw up. What happened to the tough questions from our media?
If it wasn't for Major Garrett of Fox News and Jack Tapper of ABC News, very few hard questions would ever be asked. That doesn't even count the evening worshippers of this President at MSNBC. No way if you are a thinking person, would you watch MSNBC. Those shows give spin not news. Then we have Brian Williams almost bowing to the "leader" not to mention the infomercial of ABC on Obama healthcare.
This Nation was founded with Freedom of the Press in the Constitution but that doesn't mean Freedom to worship a President and hide facts from the American public. A Free Press is an independent Press not a Press that the White House Press Secretary can spin at will. Members of the Press need to get a reality check and realize their first job is not to listen to spin and report that spin from the White House Press Office, but to search out the truth and report.
Where is the media about this President's double standards when it comes to interfering in another country's business?
First he tells Israel they cannot build settlements which is none of his business. It is their land. The United States has always been a strong ally and supporter of Israel until this President took office. Fortunately, members of Congress still support Israel wholeheartedly.
Second, he doesn't want to get involved in Iran as Freedom Fighters demonstrate against the election fraud in Iran. Iranians are killed in peaceful demonstrations because they are against the current regime - shot in cold blood in some cases but our President plays golf on Father's Day (do as I say not as I do on Fathers Day) and eventually gets around to saying the Government shouldn't be doing that to their citizens. That said, he says Iranians are still welcome at our Embassies around the World to celebrate the 4th of July with eating hot dogs. What kind of diplomacy is that?
Now fast forward to this past weekend when the Hondurian Congress and then the Supreme Court gave the order to remove the current President who was going against their Constitution in declaring a referendum vote on Constitutional term limits so he could stay in power. He had no authority to call for referendum as that is not how they change their Constitution. The President who was ousted wanted Honduras to align closer to the Chavez and other Communist dictators and was moving the Country toward socialism and communism.
What does our "leader" do? We find out he has worked for several weeks to try and keep a Honduran President in power who was going against the Honduran Constitution. He is eventually removed by their Congress and Supreme Court who issues an order to the military to remove the current President. Obama strongly condemns Hondruas for their military coup when it was NO coup as the Congress and Supreme Court took the necessary steps before the Supreme Court gave the order to remove the President. Where was the fearless "leader" when this went down? He was playing golf like he did on Fathers Day after telling Fathers across America to stay home on Fathers Day.
The supposed "leader" of the free world, the American President, has sidedonce again sided with the Communist or Muslim dictators like Chavez, Noriega, and Castro. In the meantime he disses our allies Great Britain, France, Israel, Honduras, etc.
What does that tell the American people about this President? This "leader" is no friend to freedom loving people around the world. He doesn't even mouth the words freedom. His arrogance knows no bounds as he bows to the Saudi King. What American President would ever bow to a Saudi King? He cares more about the Muslim leaders then the leaders of our friends in NATO as evidenced by his looks at them when he meets with them. It has been dubbed the "Evil Eye" - judge for yourself.
In the days ahead we will take a closer look at his lack of foreign policy experience and how he is siding with Chavez, Castro, and Noriega against the legitimate government of Honduras who removed their President LEGALLY.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Raw Story 
Posts
