If you care to read the whole interview, please go to the link below at New York Magazine. Personally have no desire to have more than this snippet on my website about Romney and his plans because this one paragraph says it all. What kind of a candidate is he that he expects people to vote for him not knowing his plans? I like the sound of 'Because then I'd lose' which suits me just fine. Romney is treating this like he would a company with a hostile takeover even when the majority of Republicans don't want him.
The man never ceases to amaze me with abject stupidity. Tell voters you have a plan when you become President but voters cannot see what it is. We are supposed to believe a bigger flip flopper than Kerry that it would be good for the US? Give me a break -- this man is not ready for prime time and never will be.
Mitt: I Won't Detail Plans, Because Then I'd Lose
Posted: 03/26/2012 3:28 pm
Mitt Romney has embraced a budget plan that would entail cutting federal programs other than defense and Social Security by more than half. It does beg the question of how he plans to carry out such a sweeping goal. In an interview with the Weekly Standard, Romney says he'd eliminate a bunch of departments. But he won’t say which ones.
Read the whole story at New York MagazineRomney is going to eliminate a bunch of departments but we are not allowed to know which ones? Does he plan on ruling by executive orders as well. Our complaints with Obama are that he is too secretive so along comes Romney and brags about a plan none of us can see. Sticking with my Obama lite!
Breaking News in case you missed it: Pres Bush 41 is going to endorse Romney tomorrow -- who would have thought one of the masterminds behind Romney from the first failed try for President would have endorsed him again. Bush 41 is taking a legacy and trashing it with the tactics out of his people in this race to get Romney the nomination. The question is WHY?
Raw Story 
Posts
