Breitbart.tv has just posted video of Obama speech about the GITMO prisoners when he was a Senator at Bombshell: Uncovered Obama Statement — KSM Will Get ‘Full Military Trial’ What changed to make Obama as President do a 180 and now want the mastermind tried in Federal Court not a by a military tribunal? Who is pulling the strings of Obama now on this case?
We cannot believe the cold heartedness of this Administration to try these terrorists in civilian court in NYC and bring all of 9/11 events front and center with absolutely no thought to the grief suffered by the people of NYC. That doesn't even include the legal ramifications. Trying these people in federal court like you would an American citizen is so wrong from every aspect that it is hard to grasp what this all means.
When we think Obama cannot go any lower, they do. This man and his fellow Jihadists are responsible for the deaths of 2,605 in the twin towers of the World Trade Center. On 9/11 this man was responsible for a total of of 2,993 (including 19 hijackers) deaths from the World Trade Center, Pentagon, and United Flight 83. Now we wake up to discover this Administration wants to try Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, mastermind of 9/11, and his fellow Jihadists in federal court where a lot of evidence cannot be submitted. Will a jury in NYC find them 'not guilty' because the evidence to convict them cannot be used or will they not get the death penality because evidence cannot be used? There is no one more deserving of the death penality then Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
This article from Dick Morris and Eileen McGann needs to be read by every American and then ask yourself WHY are Obama and Holder doing this? Do they want the mastermind of 9/11 and his fellow Islamic Jihadist to go free?
PAINTING A BULL’S EYE ON NEW YORK CITY
By Dick Morris And Eileen McGann
11.14.2009
President Obama’s decision to put Khalid Sheikh Mohammed on trial in New York City along with four others accused of helping destroy the World Trade Center and attack the Pentagon on 9-11 paints a bulls-eye for terrorists right on New York City, their favorite target. Now Obama has identified where the terrorists should focus their energies – on New York City.
His decision to bow to political correctness and not to try Mohammed at a secure military base and to try him in a civilian court, according him all the rights of an American citizen, raises important questions:
Most importantly, is the admissible evidence against Mohammed damning enough to secure a conviction? The evidentiary requirements protecting an American citizen on trial are far stricter than those which would apply to an enemy combatant before a military tribunal. We already watched how the twentieth hijacker, Zacarias Moussaoui escaped the death penalty because the evidence the government could use against him in a civilian criminal court was limited by his civil liberties. As a result, the data from his computer, which had not been seized pursuant to the Fourth Amendment, could not be entered into evidence against him. Failing such evidence, the feds had to settle for a life sentence.
Excerpt: Read more at Dick Morris.com
Raw Story 
Posts
1 comment:
Since his transferring the 9/11 Terrorist case to the US Criminal Court in NYC now manifests, as nothing has to date, that Obama is, or is acting as, Commander-in-Chief of a Fifth Column rather than of the United States of America, Robert Bauer's becoming White House Counsel is more than pivotal as to Obama's legal representation in the only remaining Constitutional Eligibility case (for damages by Keyes), Keyes v. Obama, USDC, CA -- that is, the only remaining Obama Constitutional case addressing the dual loyalties prohibition under the Article 2 "natural born citizen" (two citizen parents) requirement inserted in the Constitution to avert the very threat manifested by Obama's latest 9/11 actions.
Assuming the Alan Keyes suit or cause of action for tort fraud against Candidate (Pre-President) Obama survives in Judge Carter’s court (e.g., leave to file second amended complaint), Bauer, in his official Government capacity as White House Counsel (as well as the Justice Dept. for that matter) cannot appropriately represent Obama in a Government capacity.
Although service of process on Obama occurred the day before the 1/21/09 valid Oath of Office, even if service occurred after Oath of Office, Obama would not have Presidential immunity for personal torts. (Any Presidential immunity is even less than Congressional immunity.)
Post a Comment