This is a follow up to yesterday's article on the building of mosques in America and the political correct politicians who see nothing wrong with Sharia law. Too many times we have heard Sharia law does not conflict with the Constitution, but that is a lie. It conflicts big time. In the United States under our Rule of Law, the husband and brother would be charged with a crime for doing this to his wife.
Mutilations like Aisha's are far from the worst that can happen to women under Sharia law; the United Nations estimates that at least 5,000 women are murdered every year in "honor killings" by Muslim family members aggrieved by a wife or daughter thought to have disgraced her kin. As Fox News' recent reporting has made clear, such crimes happen in America, too, and will likely become more frequent occurrences as Muslims here demand, as their co-adherents already are in Britain and on the continent, that they be allowed to live under Sharia separate from the established civil law.
Will Obama agree to them living under Sharia Law in this Country and not prosecture the people who kill or maim woman in the name of Islam? Will Eric Holder at the DOJ turn a blind eye to these kills. We have already had killings in this country. Are we going to have more because a woman didn't do what she was told under Sharia Law?
It is time to stop this nonsense of liberals led by Obama trying to convince the rest of us that we have nothing to fear from the Muslim religion. What other religion advocates mercy killings against woman who disobey and don't want to be treated like slaves or flies planes into buildings to kill people in the name of Allah?
Read this article from Mark Tapscott, Editor of the Examiner, and ask yourself why we are allowing huge Mosques to be built in the United States when Sharia Law advocates mercy killings. It is time to end political correctness as the Muslims who adhere to Sharia Law are the ones who want to kill Jews and Christians. How many Muslims do not follow Sharia Law? That is a question that needs an answer.
Desperate stakes for women under Sharia
Examiner Editorial
August 10, 2010It is impossible to view Time magazine's cover photograph of Aisha, an 18-year-old Afghan girl whose nose and ears were severed by her husband and brother-in-law on the order of a Taliban commander, without shuddering in recoil. Her "crime" was nothing more than fleeing the hellish home of in-laws who had beaten and enslaved her. That Aisha's only recourse in the face of such abuse was to run and hide is testimony to the reality that, in Afghanistan and elsewhere in the Muslim world that Sharia law prevails, women are at best second-class citizens. Sharia is the vehicle by which the most oppressive tenets of extreme Islamic religion become the civil law of any society on which it is imposed. In many such places, daily life for women and girls remains today much as it was a millennium ago -- the unrelieved tedium, oppression and drudgery of chattel.The cover of the Aug. 9 issue of Time Magazine shows a photo of Aisha, an 18-year-old Afghan woman whose nose and ears were cut off in 2009 under orders from a local Taliban commander as punishment for fleeing her husband’s home. (Jodi Bieber, Institute for Time Magazine/AP)
It would thus be a terrible mistake to dismiss Aisha as a nightmarish exception to the rule. As Examiner columnist Diana West noted Sunday, "similar scenarios play out beyond the wilds of the Taliban zone wherever Sharia culture flowers, an expanding zone that now includes urban centers of the Western world from Berlin to London to Atlanta to Calgary." ...
It is no coincidence that renewed attention is being paid to the plight of Aisha and other Muslim women, even as we learn that 10 medical missionaries with a Christian charitable organization, including six Americans, were slaughtered last week in a remote area of northeast Afghanistan while returning from a mercy mission giving medical and dental care. The Taliban murdered them for allegedly speaking about Christianity, a charge the sponsoring organization vigorously denied. Such barbarities remind us that no place must be given for moral equivalence on these issues.
If our civil law doesn't permit Mormon polygamy, Fundamentalist snake handling or Christian Scientist denial of medical care for children, even less can it tolerate Muslim mutilation and murder of women. Those who can't -- or won't -- see the difference between a murderous intolerance and the intolerance of murder should be pitied and ignored.
Read more at the Washington Examiner: http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/Desperate-stakes-for-women-under-Sharia-1008710-100300154.html#ixzz0wCwlvCEj
No comments:
Post a Comment