"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men
from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."
(Thomas Jefferson)

Friday, February 3, 2012

Time to Oust Senate Democrats from Leadership: Reid -- This year's budget is done

One thing can be said for Majority Leader Harry Reid and his leadership team -- they have been lying for so long looks like they believe their lies.  There is no way agreeing to a budget deal is the same as passing a real budget.  We agree with Jeff Sessions (R-AL) that this group of Democrats doesn't want the public to see their plans for a budget especially in an election year.  The Democrats in Senate should be labeled for "Dereliction of Duty" for not passing a 'real' budget in over 1,000 days.  Senate Democrats refused to even look at the House Budget that was passed in April 2011 preferring to let the clock tick down.

This idea of funding agencies at last year's numbers by continuing resolutions flies in the face of the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control of 1974 which was passed to get the budget process under control and to move the date for the fiscal year from 1 July to 1 October.

Excerpt from the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act
  1. to assure effective congressional control over the budgetary process;
  2. to provide for the congressional determination each year of the appropriate level of Federal revenues and expenditures;
  3. to provide a system of impoundment control;
  4. to establish national budget priorities; and
  5. to provide for the furnishing of information by the executive branch in a manner that will assist the Congress in discharging its duties.

At this rate, why are we paying them the large salaries if they cannot even pass a budget? It is one of their few responsibilities under the law, but the Democrat Senate is MIA soon starting their 4th year with no budget and no plans to pass a budget according to Harry Reid.

After Republicans took over the House in January 2011, they passed a budget in April 2011 which was the first House budget passed in over since the fall of 2007.  Democrats obviously don't want the American people to know how Congress spends money as their actions speak louder then their words.

There is one solution to the Senate not passing a budget -- defeat the Senate Democrats on November 6, 2012, because after over 1,000 days of no 'real' budget they need to lose their leadership positions and be sent to the unemployment line so in 2013 the Senate can pass a 'real' budget.  We certainly don't want Pelosi and her buddies back in charge of the House where they also were unable to pass a budget.  Might want to do some tweaking with the House leadership, but it is highly recommended that Republicans keep control of the House and then put people in charge to stop the runaway spending.

After reading this, it popped in my mind about how dumb do Democrats think the American voter really is?  Looks like they think we are pretty dumb to buy off on their budget claims!
Reid: This year's budget is done
By Vicki Needham - 02/03/12 06:00 PM ET 
Senate Democratic leaders on Friday said they do not intend to bring a fiscal 2013 budget up for a floor vote.

"We do not need to bring a budget to the floor this year — it's done, we don't need to do it," Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) told reporters on Friday. 
Reid and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) argued that the debt-limit agreement in August directs spending for the next year and said Senate Appropriations Chairman Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) has already asked the heads of the subcommittees to write their appropriations bills for fiscal 2013. 
Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad (D-N.D.) has said he would probably mark up a budget resolution for 2013, but Reid recently told the Hill he didn't expect any floor action on a measure produced by the panel.

Republicans have attacked Democrats for failing to bring a budget to the floor. Last week, they marked the 1,000th day since Democrats have passed a budget, accusing the majority of shirking its duty while the deficit soars. 
House Budget Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), who is working on his own budget plan, tweeted Friday that Senate Democrats "‪confirm they’ve given up on budgeting. What a disgrace. Reid's refusal to budget is a recipe for crisis.‬" 
Ryan has said that Democrats should be embarrassed to claim the debt deal as their blueprint because it "fell far, far short of solving this country’s fiscal problems." 
“It’s been more than 1,000 days since Senate Democrats have offered a budget plan to the American people," Jeff Sessions (Ala.), the ranking Republican on the budget committee, said in a statement. “Now, once again, the Senate’s ineffectual Democrat majority balks at the task of leadership.” 
Sessions argued Senate Democrats don’t want to spell out a long-term budget plan for fear of public scrutiny. 
"[Reid] obviously continues in his belief that it would be politically foolish for his members to go on record in support of any long-term vision," he said. "But by refusing to lay out a budget plan for public examination — a fact no one can deny — the Democrat Senate has forfeited the high privilege to lead this chamber." 
Schumer said it’s a "total falsity" for Republicans to say that Democrats haven't passed the budget. 
"We passed it on Aug. 2," Schumer said, referring to the debt deal. 
"They're attacking us because they have nothing better to do," Reid added. "They need something else to talk about." 
Conrad's panel has released an analysis asserting that the deal reached in August to raise the debt ceiling was, for all intents and purposes, a budget. 
The Budget Control Act included caps on discretionary spending and examined entitlement programs and revenue, the analysis said. “Republican rhetoric aside, Congress did pass a budget,” the fact sheet said. 
"Either they don't know what they did or they are misrepresenting what we all did," Conrad said. 
Sessions argued that the spending caps under the debt-limit agreement "crafted behind closed doors and rushed to passage at the 11th hour under threat of panic, do not even approach the definition of the budget process that the law requires." 
"They are not in any way or any sense a Senate Democrat budget plan," Sessions said. 
"There is no argument that can be made that these caps are a long-term vision for this country — not on taxes, not on entitlements, not on spending, not on debt." 
A budget resolution serves as a blueprint for spending and isn't signed by the president; it provides a broad outline for the Appropriations Committee for spending choices. The panel is required to follow the recommendations, although they tend to stick close to the overall discretionary spending figure. 
Reid and Schumer said the outline already exists and an overall spending level is agreed to for the fiscal 2013 bills. The committee will divide up $1.047 trillion in discretionary spending, with roughly half headed for the Defense Department. 
The Pentagon is requesting $525 billion for fiscal 2013 with an additional $88.4 billion for overseas operations such as Afghanistan. This is decrease of $531 billion and $115 billion, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta announced last week. 
Erik Wasson contributed.— This story was originally posted at 2:05 p.m. and has been updated.  
Source:  The Hill 

No comments: